Literature DB >> 26100534

Immunophenotype of normal vs. myeloma plasma cells: Toward antibody panel specifications for MRD detection in multiple myeloma.

Juan Flores-Montero1, Ruth de Tute2, Bruno Paiva3, José Juan Perez4, Sebastian Böttcher5, Henk Wind6, Luzalba Sanoja1, Noemí Puig4, Quentin Lecrevisse1, María Belén Vidriales4, Jacques J M van Dongen6, Alberto Orfao1.   

Abstract

In recent years, several studies on large series of multiple myeloma (MM) patients have demonstrated the clinical utility of flow cytometry monitoring of minimal residual disease (flow-MRD) in bone marrow (BM), for improved assessment of response to therapy and prognostication. However, disturbing levels of variability exist regarding the specific protocols and antibody panels used in individual laboratories. Overall, consensus exists about the utility of combined assessment of CD38 and CD138 for the identification of BM plasma cells (PC); in contrast, more heterogeneous lists of markers are used to further distinguish between normal/reactive PCs and myeloma PCs in the MRD settings. Among the later markers, CD19, CD45, CD27, and CD81, together with CD56, CD117, CD200, and CD307, have emerged as particularly informative; however, no single marker provides enough specificity for clear discrimination between clonal PCs and normal PCs. Accordingly, multivariate analyses of single PCs from large series of normal/reactive vs. myeloma BM samples have shown that combined assessment of CD138 and CD38, together with CD45, CD19, CD56, CD27, CD81, and CD117 would be ideally suited for MRD monitoring in virtually every MM patient. However, the specific antibody clones, fluorochrome conjugates and sources of the individual markers determines its optimal (vs. suboptimal or poor) performance in an eight-color staining. Assessment of clonality, via additional cytoplasmic immunoglobulin (CyIg) κ vs. CyIgλ evaluation, may contribute to further establish the normal/reactive vs. clonal nature of small suspicious PC populations at high sensitivity levels, provided that enough cells are evaluated.
© 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EuroFlow; antibody panels; high sensitivity; markers; minimal residual disease; multiple myeloma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26100534     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom        ISSN: 1552-4949            Impact factor:   3.058


  56 in total

Review 1.  Determination of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Does It Matter?

Authors:  Shalin Kothari; Jens Hillengass; Philip L McCarthy; Sarah A Holstein
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias and Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Kah Teong Soh; Joseph D Tario; Paul K Wallace
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.935

3.  Development of an unbiased, semi-automated approach for classifying plasma cell immunophenotype following multicolor flow cytometry of bone marrow aspirates.

Authors:  Steven R Post; Ginell R Post; Dejan Nikolic; Rebecca Owens; Giovanni Insuasti-Beltran
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.058

4.  MRD detection in multiple myeloma: comparison between MSKCC 10-color single-tube and EuroFlow 8-color 2-tube methods.

Authors:  Mikhail Roshal; Juan A Flores-Montero; Qi Gao; Maesa Koeber; Jessica Wardrope; Brian G M Durie; Ahmet Dogan; Alberto Orfao; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-05-03

5.  Flow Cytometric Evaluation of Traditional and Novel Surface Markers for the Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias.

Authors:  Dominik F Draxler; Lisa M Wutzlhofer; Georg Slavka; Wolfgang Hübl; Heinz Ludwig; Martin Schreder; John Reynolds; Martin Willheim
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  Monitoring of Measurable Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Kah Teong Soh; Paul K Wallace
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cytom       Date:  2019-07-17

7.  Minimal Residual Disease Negativity Does Not Overcome Poor Prognosis in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chutima Kunacheewa; Hans C Lee; Krina Patel; Sheeba Thomas; Behrang Amini; Samer Srour; Qaiser Bashir; Yago Nieto; Muzzaffar H Qazilbash; Donna M Weber; Lei Feng; Robert Z Orlowski; Pei Lin; Elisabet E Manasanch
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2020-01-15

8.  Introduction to multiple myeloma special issue: The flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Frederic I Preffer; Constance M Yuan; Pei Lin; MaryAlice Stetler-Stevenson; Gerald E Marti
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.058

9.  The prognostic significance of polyclonal bone marrow plasma cells in patients with relapsing multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Toshi Ghosh; Wilson I Gonsalves; Dragan Jevremovic; Angela Dispenzieri; David Dingli; Michael M Timm; William G Morice; Prashant Kapoor; Taxiarchis V Kourelis; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; Francis K Buadi; Nelson Leung; Ronald S Go; Yi Lin; Stephen J Russell; John A Lust; Steven R Zeldenrust; Rahma Warsame; Yi L Hwa; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 10.  BMT CTN Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Minimal Residual Disease and Immune Profiling: Summary and Recommendations from the Organizing Committee.

Authors:  Sarah A Holstein; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Theresa Hahn; Christine M Ho; Jens G Lohr; Nikhil C Munshi; Bruno Paiva; Marcelo C Pasquini; Joseph D Tario; Saad Z Usmani; Paul K Wallace; Katja Weisel; Philip L McCarthy
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.