Literature DB >> 32037287

Minimal Residual Disease Negativity Does Not Overcome Poor Prognosis in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Chutima Kunacheewa1, Hans C Lee1, Krina Patel1, Sheeba Thomas1, Behrang Amini2, Samer Srour3, Qaiser Bashir3, Yago Nieto3, Muzzaffar H Qazilbash3, Donna M Weber1, Lei Feng4, Robert Z Orlowski1, Pei Lin5, Elisabet E Manasanch6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a standard measurement for response assessment in multiple myeloma (MM). Despite new treatments, high-risk MM patients continue to have poor prognosis. We evaluated the effect of MRD negativity in high-risk versus standard-risk patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive MM patients who underwent routine MRD testing by 1-tube 8-color advanced flow cytometry with 2,000,000 events and sensitivity level 10-5 at our center from 2015 to 2018 after initial therapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test were used to assess survival estimates and differences between study groups.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six patients with MRD testing after initial therapy or autologous stem-cell transplantation were identified. At a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 1-36 months), progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly worse in high-risk versus standard-risk patients. During the study period, 50% of high-risk group had experienced disease progression (relapse and/or death) versus 20% in the standard-risk group (P = .0006). No patients with standard-risk died, but 4 (14%) in the high-risk group did (P = .0007). Regardless of MRD status, high-risk patients had statistically significant worse progression-free survival than standard-risk patients. At median follow-up, those with disease 10% standard-risk/MRD negative; 20% standard-risk/MRD positive; 40% high-risk/MRD negative; and 45% high-risk/MRD positive had either experienced relapse or died (P = .0041). MRD status did not significantly affect overall survival in either group (P = .0914); however, longer follow-up is needed to assess survival.
CONCLUSION: Genetic abnormalities remain a powerful prognostic indicator for MM, regardless of MRD status. For newly diagnosed MM patients treated with novel triple-drug initial therapy and frontline autologous stem-cell transplantation, MRD-negative status did not mitigate the poor-prognosis outcomes of high-risk MM patients.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic risk; High-risk myeloma; Minimal residual disease; Newly diagnosed myeloma; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32037287      PMCID: PMC7190410          DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  42 in total

1.  High-risk myeloma and minimal residual disease postautologous-HSCT predict worse outcomes.

Authors:  Bei Hu; Peter Thall; Denái R Milton; Koji Sasaki; Qaiser Bashir; Nina Shah; Krina Patel; Uday Popat; Chitra Hosing; Yago Nieto; Pei Lin; Ruby Delgado; Jeffrey Jorgensen; Elisabet Manasanch; Donna Weber; Sheeba Thomas; Robert Z Orlowski; Richard Champlin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2018-07-22

Review 2.  Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias and Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Kah Teong Soh; Joseph D Tario; Paul K Wallace
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.935

3.  Evidence of an epigenetic origin for high-risk 1q21 copy number aberrations in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Sawyer; Erming Tian; Christoph J Heuck; Donald J Johann; Joshua Epstein; Charles M Swanson; Janet L Lukacs; Regina Lichti Binz; Marian Johnson; Gael Sammartino; Maurizio Zangari; Faith E Davies; Frits van Rhee; Gareth J Morgan; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  High-risk cytogenetics and persistent minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry predict unsustained complete response after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Norma C Gutiérrez; Laura Rosiñol; María-Belén Vídriales; María-Ángeles Montalbán; Joaquín Martínez-López; María-Victoria Mateos; María-Teresa Cibeira; Lourdes Cordón; Albert Oriol; María-José Terol; María-Asunción Echeveste; Raquel de Paz; Felipe de Arriba; Luis Palomera; Javier de la Rubia; Joaquín Díaz-Mediavilla; Anna Sureda; Ana Gorosquieta; Adrian Alegre; Alejandro Martin; Miguel T Hernández; Juan-José Lahuerta; Joan Bladé; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Consensus guidelines on plasma cell myeloma minimal residual disease analysis and reporting.

Authors:  Maria Arroz; Neil Came; Pei Lin; Weina Chen; Constance Yuan; Anand Lagoo; Mariela Monreal; Ruth de Tute; Jo-Anne Vergilio; Andy C Rawstron; Bruno Paiva
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.058

Review 6.  Minimal Residual Disease Detection by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma: Why and How?

Authors:  Mikhail Roshal
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.851

7.  Longitudinal Flow Cytometry Identified "Minimal Residual Disease" (MRD) Evolution Patterns for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients with Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Jingli Gu; Junru Liu; Meilan Chen; Beihui Huang; Juan Li
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Complete response correlates with long-term survival and progression-free survival in high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Helgi J K van de Velde; Xiangyang Liu; Gang Chen; Andrew Cakana; William Deraedt; Martine Bayssas
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; S Vincent Rajkumar; Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; Francis K Buadi; Steven R Zeldenrust; David Dingli; Stephen J Russell; John A Lust; Philip R Greipp; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders.

Authors:  Andy C Rawstron; Alberto Orfao; Meral Beksac; Ludmila Bezdickova; Rik A Brooimans; Horia Bumbea; Klara Dalva; Gwenny Fuhler; Jan Gratama; Dirk Hose; Lucie Kovarova; Michael Lioznov; Gema Mateo; Ricardo Morilla; Anne K Mylin; Paola Omedé; Catherine Pellat-Deceunynck; Martin Perez Andres; Maria Petrucci; Marina Ruggeri; Grzegorz Rymkiewicz; Alexander Schmitz; Martin Schreder; Carine Seynaeve; Martin Spacek; Ruth M de Tute; Els Van Valckenborgh; Nicky Weston-Bell; Roger G Owen; Jesús F San Miguel; Pieter Sonneveld; Hans E Johnsen
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 9.941

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prognostic Significance of the Stage at Which an MRD-Negative Status Is Achieved for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Received ASCT.

Authors:  Qian Sun; Xiaozhe Li; Jingli Gu; Beihui Huang; Junru Liu; Meilan Chen; Juan Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Clinical implications of loss of bone marrow minimal residual disease negativity in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Meera Mohan; Samantha Kendrick; Aniko Szabo; Naveen Yarlagadda; Dinesh Atwal; Yadav Pandey; Arya Roy; Richa Parikh; James Lopez; Sharmilan Thanendrarajan; Carolina Schinke; Daisy Alapat; Jeffrey Sawyer; Erming Tian; Guido Tricot; Frits van Rhee; Maurizio Zangari
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-02-08

3.  Clinical Utility of Next-Generation Flow-Based Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Hyun-Young Kim; In Young Yoo; Dae Jin Lim; Hee-Jin Kim; Sun-Hee Kim; Sang Eun Yoon; Seok Jin Kim; Duck Cho; Kihyun Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.941

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.