Literature DB >> 20385994

Importance of achieving a complete response in multiple myeloma, and the impact of novel agents.

Asher A Chanan-Khan1, Sergio Giralt.   

Abstract

The goal of treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) is to improve patients' long-term outcomes. One important factor that has been associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival is the quality of response to treatment, particularly achievement of a complete response (CR). There is extensive evidence from clinical studies in the transplant setting in first-line MM demonstrating that CR or maximal response post-transplant is significantly associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival, with some studies demonstrating a similar association with postinduction response. Supportive evidence is also available from studies in the nontransplant and relapsed settings. With the introduction of bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide, higher rates of CR are being achieved in both first-line and relapsed MM compared with previous chemotherapeutic approaches, thereby potentially improving long-term outcomes. While standard CR by established response criteria has been shown to have differential prognostic impact compared with lesser responses, increasingly sensitive analytic techniques are now being explored to define more stringent degrees of CR or elimination of minimal residual disease (MRD), including multiparameter flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction. Demonstrating eradication of MRD by these techniques has already been shown to predict for improved outcomes. Here, we review the prognostic significance of achieving CR in MM and highlight the importance of CR as an increasingly realizable goal at all stages of treatment. We discuss clinical management issues and provide recommendations relevant to practicing oncologists, such as the routine use of sensitive techniques for assessment of disease status to inform evidence-based decisions on optimal patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20385994     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  64 in total

1.  200 mg/m(2) melphalan--the gold standard for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sergio Giralt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Total marrow irradiation: a new ablative regimen as part of tandem autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  George Somlo; Ricardo Spielberger; Paul Frankel; Chatchada Karanes; Amrita Krishnan; Pablo Parker; Leslie Popplewell; Firoozeh Sahebi; Neil Kogut; David Snyder; An Liu; Timothy Schultheiss; Stephen Forman; Jeffrey Y C Wong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Long-term results of the GIMEMA VEL-03-096 trial in MM patients receiving VTD consolidation after ASCT: MRD kinetics' impact on survival.

Authors:  S Ferrero; M Ladetto; D Drandi; F Cavallo; E Genuardi; M Urbano; S Caltagirone; M Grasso; F Rossini; T Guglielmelli; C Cangialosi; A M Liberati; V Callea; T Carovita; C Crippa; L De Rosa; F Pisani; A P Falcone; P Pregno; S Oliva; C Terragna; P Musto; R Passera; M Boccadoro; A Palumbo
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Hematology: Setting the standard for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jacob Laubach; Paul G Richardson; Kenneth Anderson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Impact of CR before and after allogeneic and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: results from the EBMT NMAM2000 prospective trial.

Authors:  S Iacobelli; L C de Wreede; S Schönland; B Björkstrand; U Hegenbart; A Gruber; H Greinix; L Volin; F Narni; A M Carella; M Beksac; A Bosi; G Milone; P Corradini; K Friberg; A van Biezen; H Goldschmidt; T de Witte; C Morris; D Niederwieser; L Garderet; N Kröger; G Gahrton
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Current approaches to the initial treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jagoda K Jasielec; Andrzej J Jakubowiak
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-02

Review 7.  Myeloma in Elderly Patients: When Less Is More and More Is More.

Authors:  Ashley Rosko; Sergio Giralt; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Angela Dispenzieri
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017

8.  VTD consolidation, without bisphosphonates, reduces bone resorption and is associated with a very low incidence of skeletal-related events in myeloma patients post ASCT.

Authors:  E Terpos; D Christoulas; E Kastritis; M Roussou; M Migkou; E Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou; M Gavriatopoulou; M Gkotzamanidou; N Kanellias; E Manios; C Papadimitriou; M A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  A phase 1 study of bendamustine and melphalan conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Tomer M Mark; Whitney Reid; Ruben Niesvizky; Usama Gergis; Roger Pearse; Sebastian Mayer; June Greenberg; Morton Coleman; Koen Van Besien; Tsiporah Shore
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Bortezomib consolidation after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a Nordic Myeloma Study Group randomized phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist; Peter Gimsing; Oyvind Hjertner; Stig Lenhoff; Edward Laane; Kari Remes; Hlif Steingrimsdottir; Niels Abildgaard; Lucia Ahlberg; Cecilie Blimark; Inger Marie Dahl; Karin Forsberg; Tobias Gedde-Dahl; Henrik Gregersen; Astrid Gruber; Nina Guldbrandsen; Einar Haukås; Kristina Carlson; Ann Kristin Kvam; Hareth Nahi; Roald Lindås; Niels Frost Andersen; Ingemar Turesson; Anders Waage; Jan Westin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.