Literature DB >> 29296446

Head to head comparison of two commercial phantoms used for SRS QA.

Vikren Sarkar1, Long Huang1, Yu-Huei Jessica Huang1, Martin W Szegedi1, Prema Rassiah-Szegedi1, Hui Zhao1, Bill J Salter1.   

Abstract

Multiple commercial phantoms are now available for performing end-to-end QA testing for stereotactic procedures. This project aims at directly comparing one of the newest phantoms on the market against a more established one by performing similar tests to determine whether results are similar and they can be used interchangeably. Both phantoms were used to evaluate the coincidence of radiation and laser isocenters of a linear accelerator. End-to-end dosimetric tests were also performed using both an ion chamber and film. As part of the testing, both phantoms were also evaluated in terms of their efficiency of setup as well as the time required to switch inserts for different tests. Results showed that the laser/radiation isocenter coincidence as determined from each phantom was highly correlated. Ion chamber results were within 0.5% of the expected values. Gamma (2%, 2mm) pass rates of corresponding films were within 2% between phantoms. These results show that both phantoms are capable of producing equivalent results for the QA tests evaluated here.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FFF; HexaPOD; SBRT; SRS; brain; intrafractional motion; lung; rotations; stereotactic

Year:  2016        PMID: 29296446      PMCID: PMC5658804     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT


  16 in total

1.  The importance of computed tomography slice thickness in radiographic patient positioning for radiosurgery.

Authors:  M J Murphy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Quality assurance in stereotactic space. A system test for verifying the accuracy of aim in radiosurgery.

Authors:  A Mack; Heinz Czempiel; Hans-Jürg Kreiner; Gerhard Dürr; Berndt Wowra
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comprehensive quality assurance for stereotactic radiosurgery treatments.

Authors:  R Ramaseshan; M Heydarian
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part I: evaluation using a 3D phantom.

Authors:  Deming Wang; Wendy Strugnell; Gary Cowin; David M Doddrell; Richard Slaughter
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Quality assurance in stereotactic radiosurgery using a standard linear accelerator.

Authors:  J S Tsai; B A Buck; G K Svensson; E Alexander; C W Cheng; E G Mannarino; J S Loeffler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Quality assurance of immobilization and target localization systems for frameless stereotactic cranial and extracranial hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Timothy D Solberg; Paul M Medin; John Mullins; Sicong Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator.

Authors:  W Lutz; K R Winston; N Maleki
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Quality assurance in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  A P Warrington; R W Laing; M Brada
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Assurance of high quality linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  R E Drzymala; E E Klein; J R Simpson; K M Rich; T H Wasserman; J A Purdy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Image fusion pitfalls for cranial radiosurgery.

Authors:  Benjamin P Jonker
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-04-17
View more
  2 in total

1.  The current status and shortcomings of stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Hunter Mehrens; Trang Nguyen; Sharbacha Edward; Shannon Hartzell; Mallory Glenn; Daniela Branco; Nadia Hernandez; Paola Alvarez; Andrea Molineu; Paige Taylor; Stephen Kry
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-04-20

2.  The influence of radiotherapy techniques on the plan quality and on the risk of secondary tumors in patients with pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Marius Treutwein; Felix Steger; Rainer Loeschel; Oliver Koelbl; Barbara Dobler
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.