Literature DB >> 12894984

Comprehensive quality assurance for stereotactic radiosurgery treatments.

R Ramaseshan1, M Heydarian.   

Abstract

We have used a commercially available high precision Lucy phantom to perform comprehensive quality assurance for stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. The quantitative evaluation of system uncertainties included imaging, planning and treatment delivery systems. The quality assurance tests showed that the well-defined targets were identified to within +/-1 mm in all the imaging modalities. The pre-known target volumes were reproduced within 2 cm3 in both MR and CT. The planned target was delivered within 2% of the prescribed dose and to within 2 mm accuracy. The inaccuracy in the isocentre position at the Linac was less than 1.2 mm. The maximum error observed in the depth helmet was 0.5 mm and the overall uncertainty was within 0.23 mm. We have also established a quality assurance program based on the study and proposed the tolerance and the frequency of the tests required to be carried out. The tests were carried out using a Radionics planning system and delivered on a Varian Clinac 2100 linear accelerator machine. These tests also established a base line for future comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12894984     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/14/402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Head to head comparison of two commercial phantoms used for SRS QA.

Authors:  Vikren Sarkar; Long Huang; Yu-Huei Jessica Huang; Martin W Szegedi; Prema Rassiah-Szegedi; Hui Zhao; Bill J Salter
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2016

2.  American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Practice Guideline for the Performance of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS).

Authors:  Steven K Seung; David A Larson; James M Galvin; Minesh P Mehta; Louis Potters; Christopher J Schultz; Santosh V Yajnik; Alan C Hartford; Seth A Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Monte Carlo Dose Calculation - A QA Method for SRT and SBRT Plans in Treating Multiple and Small Metastatic Lesions.

Authors:  Teh Lin; Lu Wang; C-M Charlie Ma
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 4.  Isocenter verification for linac-based stereotactic radiation therapy: review of principles and techniques.

Authors:  Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Mahsheed Sabet; Daryl J O'Connor; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  A quality assurance method with submillimeter accuracy for stereotactic linear accelerators.

Authors:  Jimm Grimm; Shu-Ya Lisa Grimm; Indra J Das; Yunping Zhu; Inhwan Yeo; Jinyu Xue; Larry Simpson; Dayee Jacob; Abhirup Sarkar
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Initial clinical experience with a radiation oncology dedicated open 1.0T MR-simulation.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Ning Wen; David Hearshen; Joshua Kim; Milan Pantelic; Bo Zhao; Tina Mancell; Kenneth Levin; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty; M Salim Siddiqui
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Volumetric accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Cheol-Woo Park; Jin-Ho Kim; Yu-Kyeong Seo; Sae-Rom Lee; Ju-Hee Kang; Song-Hee Oh; Gyu-Tae Kim; Yong-Suk Choi; Eui-Hwan Hwang
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-09-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.