Literature DB >> 2929598

The detection of linkage and heterogeneity in nuclear families for complex disorders: one versus two marker loci.

M M Martinez1, L R Goldin.   

Abstract

Using exact expected likelihoods, we have computed the average number of phase-unknown nuclear families needed to detect linkage and heterogeneity. We have examined the case of both dominant and recessive inheritance with reduced penetrance and phenocopies. Most of our calculations have been carried out under the assumption that 50% of families are linked to a marker locus. We have varied both the number of offspring per family and the sampling scheme. We have also investigated the increased power when the disease locus is midway between two marker loci 10 cM apart. For recessive inheritance, both linkage and heterogeneity can be detected in clinically feasible sample sizes. For dominant inheritance, linkage can be detected but heterogeneity cannot be detected unless larger sibships (four offspring) are sampled or two linked markers are available. As expected, if penetrance is reduced, sampling families with all sibs affected is most efficient. Our results provide a basis for estimating the amount of resources needed to find genes for complex disorders under conditions of heterogeneity.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2929598      PMCID: PMC1715576     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  9 in total

1.  TESTING FOR HETEROGENEITY OF RECOMBINATION FRACTION VALUES IN HUMAN GENETICS.

Authors:  C A SMITH
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Power and robustness of the linkage homogeneity test in genetic analysis of common disorders.

Authors:  F Clerget-Darpoux; M C Babron; C Bonaïti-Pellié
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Genetic analysis workshop IV: summary of two-point and multipoint mapping of 11p.

Authors:  D A Meyers; T H Beaty
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol Suppl       Date:  1986

4.  The number of families required to detect or exclude linkage heterogeneity.

Authors:  J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Power of the affected-sib-pair method for heterogeneous disorders.

Authors:  L R Goldin; E S Gershon
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Strategies for multilocus linkage analysis in humans.

Authors:  G M Lathrop; J M Lalouel; C Julier; J Ott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tests of linkage and heterogeneity in Mendelian diseases using identity by descent scores.

Authors:  A Chakravarti; J A Badner; C C Li
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Detecting linkage for genetically heterogeneous diseases and detecting heterogeneity with linkage data.

Authors:  L L Cavalli-Sforza; M C King
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Strategies for studying heterogeneous genetic traits in humans by using a linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms.

Authors:  E S Lander; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  The power and statistical behaviour of allele-sharing statistics when applied to models with two disease loci.

Authors:  Yin Y Shugart; Bing-Jian Feng; Andrew Collins
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Inter- and intrafamilial heterogeneity: effective sampling strategies and comparison of analysis methods.

Authors:  M Durner; D A Greenberg; S E Hodge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Detection of linkage for heterogeneous disorders by using multipoint linkage analysis.

Authors:  M Martinez; L R Goldin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Sampling strategies for linkage studies.

Authors:  L R Goldin; M M Martinez; E S Gershon
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Sample-size guidelines for linkage analysis of a dominant locus for a quantitative trait by the method of lod scores.

Authors:  M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Assessing the statistical power to detect linkage in a sample of 51 bipolar affective disorder pedigrees.

Authors:  L C Lim; N Craddock; M Owen; P Sham; M M Nöthen; J Körner; M Rietschel; R Fimmer; P Propping; P McGuffin; R Murray; M Gill
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Association versus linkage studies in psychosis genetics.

Authors:  M M Nöthen; P Propping; R Fimmers
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Joint linkage of multiple loci for a complex disorder.

Authors:  C J MacLean; P C Sham; K S Kendler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Reevaluation of the chromosome 4q candidate region for early onset periodontitis.

Authors:  T C Hart; M L Marazita; K M McCanna; H A Schenkein; S R Diehl
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Positive association in the absence of linkage suggests a minor role for the glucokinase gene in the pathogenesis of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus amongst south Indians.

Authors:  M I McCarthy; M Hitchins; G A Hitman; P Cassell; K Hawrami; N Morton; V Mohan; A Ramachandran; C Snehalatha; M Viswanathan
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.