Literature DB >> 31942163

Energy and emissions implications of automated vehicles in the U.S. energy system.

Kristen E Brown1, Rebecca Dodder1.   

Abstract

Vehicle automation has the potential to drastically transform transportation, with important implications for energy and the environment. There is considerable uncertainty regarding the impact of automation on travel demand and vehicle efficiency. We utilize the MARKet ALlocation (MARKAL) energy system model to examine four previously published scenarios that consider different effects of automation on efficiency and demand. We do not replicate detailed estimation of individual mechanisms but apply key outcomes from prior studies within a broader energy system framework. Our analysis adds insights on fuel switching, upstream impacts, and air emissions. MARKAL dynamically captures interactions between transportation and non-transportation sectors, which is important given that the revolutionary shifts from automation may invalidate static assumptions. Model results suggest that increasing travel demands from automation may boost fuel use and petroleum-based fuel prices, potentially increasing the market penetration of alternative-fuel vehicles. In contrast, dramatic efficiency improvements from automation could drive fuel prices lower, greatly reducing the competitiveness of alternative-fueled vehicles. Furthermore, these shifts could yield positive or negative environmental impacts. Some automation scenarios even resulted in counterintuitive results. For example, if high levels of efficiency improvement drive out alternative-fuel vehicles, such as battery electric and hybrids, a net worsening of air quality relative to the other scenarios could result. We also found system-level dynamics to be key. For example, reductions in liquid fuel prices led to increased consumption, and the resulting increase in air pollutant emissions offset a portion of the potential air quality benefits of automation.

Keywords:  air quality; automated vehicles; automation; emissions; scenario analysis; transportation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31942163      PMCID: PMC6961821          DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transp Res D Transp Environ        ISSN: 1361-9209            Impact factor:   5.495


  14 in total

1.  How much do electric drive vehicles matter to future U.S. emissions?

Authors:  Samaneh Babaee; Ajay S Nagpure; Joseph F DeCarolis
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Expansion of the Petroleum Refinery Life Cycle Inventory Model to Support Characterization of a Full Suite of Commonly Tracked Impact Potentials.

Authors:  Ben Young; Troy Hottle; Troy Hawkins; Matthew Jamieson; Gregory Cooney; Kavan Motazedi; Joule Bergerson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Emission Impacts of Electric Vehicles in the US Transportation Sector Following Optimistic Cost and Efficiency Projections.

Authors:  Azadeh Keshavarzmohammadian; Daven K Henze; Jana B Milford
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Accounting for climate and air quality damages in future U.S. electricity generation scenarios.

Authors:  Kristen E Brown; Daven K Henze; Jana B Milford
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  The Environmental Impact of Autonomous Vehicles Depends on Adoption Patterns.

Authors:  Shelie A Miller; Brent R Heard
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Uncertain Environmental Footprint of Current and Future Battery Electric Vehicles.

Authors:  Brian Cox; Christopher L Mutel; Christian Bauer; Angelica Mendoza Beltran; Detlef P van Vuuren
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Life Cycle Assessment of Connected and Automated Vehicles: Sensing and Computing Subsystem and Vehicle Level Effects.

Authors:  James H Gawron; Gregory A Keoleian; Robert D De Kleine; Timothy J Wallington; Hyung Chul Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Effects of recent energy system changes on CO2 projections for the United States.

Authors:  Carol S Lenox; Daniel H Loughlin
Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Analysis of alternative pathways for reducing nitrogen oxide emissions.

Authors:  Daniel H Loughlin; Katherine R Kaufman; Carol S Lenox; Bryan J Hubbell
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.235

10.  Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.

Authors:  Jason Rudokas; Paul J Miller; Marcus A Trail; Armistead G Russell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.