Cognitive remediation is a promising approach to treating core cognitive deficits in adults with autism, but rigorously controlled trials of comprehensive interventions that target both social and non-social cognition over a sufficient period of time to impact functioning are lacking. This study examined the efficacy of cognitive enhancement therapy (CET) for improving core cognitive and employment outcomes in adult autism. Verbal adult outpatients with autism spectrum disorder (N = 54) were randomized to an 18-month, single-blind trial of CET, a cognitive remediation approach that integrates computer-based neurocognitive training with group-based training in social cognition, or an active enriched supportive therapy (EST) comparison focused on psychoeducation and condition management. Primary outcomes were composite indexes of neurocognitive and social-cognitive change. Competitive employment was a secondary outcome. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated that CET produced significant differential increases in neurocognitive function relative to EST (d = .46, P = .013). Both CET and EST were associated with large social-cognitive improvements, with CET demonstrating an advantage at 9 (d = .58, P = 0.020), but not 18 months (d = .27, P = 0.298). Effects on employment indicated that participants treated with CET were significantly more likely to gain competitive employment than those in EST, OR = 6.21, P = 0.023, which was mediated by cognitive improvement. CET is a feasible and potentially effective treatment for core cognitive deficits in adult autism spectrum disorder. The treatment of cognitive impairments in this population can contribute to meaningful improvements in adult outcomes. Autism Res 2018, 11: 519-530.
RCT Entities:
Cognitive remediation is a promising approach to treating core cognitive deficits in adults with autism, but rigorously controlled trials of comprehensive interventions that target both social and non-social cognition over a sufficient period of time to impact functioning are lacking. This study examined the efficacy of cognitive enhancement therapy (CET) for improving core cognitive and employment outcomes in adult autism. Verbal adult outpatients with autism spectrum disorder (N = 54) were randomized to an 18-month, single-blind trial of CET, a cognitive remediation approach that integrates computer-based neurocognitive training with group-based training in social cognition, or an active enriched supportive therapy (EST) comparison focused on psychoeducation and condition management. Primary outcomes were composite indexes of neurocognitive and social-cognitive change. Competitive employment was a secondary outcome. Intent-to-treat analyses indicated that CET produced significant differential increases in neurocognitive function relative to EST (d = .46, P = .013). Both CET and EST were associated with large social-cognitive improvements, with CET demonstrating an advantage at 9 (d = .58, P = 0.020), but not 18 months (d = .27, P = 0.298). Effects on employment indicated that participants treated with CET were significantly more likely to gain competitive employment than those in EST, OR = 6.21, P = 0.023, which was mediated by cognitive improvement. CET is a feasible and potentially effective treatment for core cognitive deficits in adult autism spectrum disorder. The treatment of cognitive impairments in this population can contribute to meaningful improvements in adult outcomes. Autism Res 2018, 11: 519-530.
Authors: Shaun M Eack; Deborah P Greenwald; Susan S Hogarty; Susan J Cooley; Ann Louise DiBarry; Debra M Montrose; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Robert S Kern; Keith H Nuechterlein; Michael F Green; Lyle E Baade; Wayne S Fenton; James M Gold; Richard S E Keefe; Raquelle Mesholam-Gately; Jim Mintz; Larry J Seidman; Ellen Stover; Stephen R Marder Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-01-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Shaun M Eack; Amber L Bahorik; Summer A F McKnight; Susan S Hogarty; Deborah P Greenwald; Christina E Newhill; Mary L Phillips; Matcheri S Keshavan; Nancy J Minshew Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Lauren Bishop-Fitzpatrick; Sarah Dababnah; Mary J Baker-Ericzén; Matthew J Smith; Sandra M Magaña Journal: Soc Work Ment Health Date: 2018-08-23
Authors: Jamie Zelazny; Nadine Melhem; Giovanna Porta; Candice Biernesser; John G Keilp; J John Mann; Maria A Oquendo; Barbara Stanley; David A Brent Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Marjorie Solomon; Andrew Gordon; Ana-Maria Iosif; Raphael Geddert; Marie K Krug; Peter Mundy; David Hessl Journal: Autism Res Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 5.216