Literature DB >> 29279933

Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Removal of Orthopedic Implants Used for Treatment of Foot, Ankle, and Lower Leg Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Manouk Backes1, Siem A Dingemans1, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf2, H Rogier van den Berg3, Bart van Dijkman4, Jochem M Hoogendoorn5, Pieter Joosse6, Ewan D Ritchie7, W Herbert Roerdink8, Judith P M Schots9, Nico L Sosef10, Ingrid J B Spijkerman11, Bas A Twigt12, Alexander H van der Veen9, Ruben N van Veen13, Jefrey Vermeulen14, Dagmar I Vos15, Jasper Winkelhagen16, J Carel Goslings1, Tim Schepers1.   

Abstract

Importance: Following clean (class I, not contaminated) surgical procedures, the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) should be less than approximately 2%. However, an infection rate of 12.2% has been reported following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of SSIs following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial including 500 patients aged 18 to 75 years with previous surgical treatment for fractures below the knee who were undergoing removal of orthopedic implants from 19 hospitals (17 teaching and 2 academic) in the Netherlands (November 2014-September 2016), with a follow-up of 6 months (final follow-up, March 28, 2017). Exclusion criteria were an active infection or fistula, antibiotic treatment, reimplantation of osteosynthesis material in the same session, allergy for cephalosporins, known kidney disease, immunosuppressant use, or pregnancy. Interventions: A single preoperative intravenous dose of 1000 mg of cefazolin (cefazolin group, n = 228) or sodium chloride (0.9%; saline group, n = 242). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was SSI within 30 days as measured by the criteria from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcome, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction.
Results: Among 477 randomized patients (mean age, 44 years [SD, 15]; women, 274 [57%]; median time from orthopedic implant placement, 11 months [interquartile range, 7-16]), 470 patients completed the study. Sixty-six patients developed an SSI (14.0%): 30 patients (13.2%) in the cefazolin group vs 36 in the saline group (14.9%) (absolute risk difference, -1.7 [95% CI, -8.0 to 4.6], P = .60). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing surgery for removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee, a single preoperative dose of intravenous cefazolin compared with saline did not reduce the risk of surgical site infection within 30 days following implant removal. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02225821.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29279933      PMCID: PMC5820713          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.19343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  31 in total

1.  Complications of metalwork removal.

Authors:  P L Sanderson; W Ryan; P G Turner
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations.

Authors:  Ian Campbell
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Laura Prokuski
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery: difficult decisions in an era of evolving antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  D J Bryson; D L J Morris; F S Shivji; K R Rollins; S Snape; B J Ollivere
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 5.  The Primary Outcome Fails - What Next?

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network.

Authors:  J M Binkley; P W Stratford; S A Lott; D L Riddle
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1999-04

7.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Postoperative infection rates in foot and ankle surgery: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Dane K Wukich; Nicholas J Lowery; Ryan L McMillen; Robert G Frykberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential.

Authors:  Joseph H Abramson
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2011-02-02

10.  High Rates of Postoperative Wound Infection Following Elective Implant Removal.

Authors:  M Backes; N W L Schep; J S K Luitse; J C Goslings; T Schepers
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-08-31
View more
  8 in total

1.  Typo in the Discussion.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Complications of implant removal in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Taro Kasai; Takumi Matsumoto; Toru Iga; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-02-28

3.  A novel implant removal technique by endoscopy.

Authors:  Chang Heng Liu; Wen Lin Yeh; Ping Jui Tsai; Kuo Feng Fan; Hung Wei Cheng; Jian Ming Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Wound infection following implant removal of foot, ankle, lower leg or patella; a protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial investigating the (cost-)effectiveness of 2 g of prophylactic cefazolin compared to placebo (WIFI-2 trial).

Authors:  Fay R K Sanders; Diederick Penning; Manouk Backes; Siem A Dingemans; Susan van Dieren; Anne M Eskes; J Carel Goslings; Peter Kloen; Ron A A Mathôt; Niels W L Schep; Ingrid J B Spijkerman; Tim Schepers
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  In vitro evaluation of novel low-pressure spark plasma sintered HA-BG composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Muhammad Rizwan; Krishnamurithy Genasan; Malliga Raman Murali; Hanumantha Rao Balaji Raghavendran; Rodianah Alias; Yi Ying Cheok; Won Fen Wong; Azura Mansor; M Hamdi; Wan Jeffrey Basirun; Tunku Kamarul
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Interaction of basic diseases and low red blood cell count as critical murderer of wound infection after osteosarcoma resection: Wound infection after osteosarcoma resection.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Jie Wang; Xin Zhao; Xian-Qiang Lv
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Preoperative disinfection of foot and ankle: microbiological evaluation of two disinfection methods.

Authors:  Siem A Dingemans; Ingrid J B Spijkerman; Merel F N Birnie; J Carel Goslings; Tim Schepers
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  The Effect of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Surgical Antibacterial Prophylaxis (SAP) at an Orthopedic Unit.

Authors:  Adina Fésüs; Ria Benkő; Mária Matuz; Orsolya Kungler-Gorácz; Márton Á Fésüs; Tamás Bazsó; Zoltán Csernátony; Gábor Kardos
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.