| Literature DB >> 29274638 |
Mohammad Kamal1,2, Lars Andersson3, Rene Tolba4, Adel Al-Asfour3, Alexander K Bartella5, Felix Gremse6, Stefanie Rosenhain6, Frank Hölzle5, Peter Kessler7, Bernd Lethaus5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alveolar cleft repair is performed via bone grafting procedure to restore the dental arch continuity. A suitable bone substitute materials should possess osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties, to promote new bone formation, along with a slowly resorbable scaffold that is subsequently replaced with functionally viable bone. Calcium phosphate biomaterials have long proved their efficacy as bone replacement materials. Dentin in several forms has also demonstrated its possibility to be used as bone graft replacement material in several studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone regeneration pattern and quantify bone formation after grafting pre-established experimental alveolar clefts defects model in rabbits using composite xenogenic dentin and β-TCP in comparison to β-TCP alone.Entities:
Keywords: Alveolar cleft; Animal testing; Bone transplantation; Cleft lip and palate; Dentin; Grafting; Rabbit; Tissue-engineering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29274638 PMCID: PMC5742260 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1369-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Alveolar cleft model. A Osteological representation of the created alveolar cleft extending to the nasal mucosa on a New Zealand White rabbit skull. B Micro-CT imaging of the created cleft 8 weeks after cleft creation surgery representing the three-dimensional morphology of the healed residual defect. C Surgical exposure of the healed alveolar cleft for insertion of the grafting intervention 8 weeks after cleft creation surgery. D Coronal histological representation of the healed alveolar cleft 8 weeks after cleft creation surgery with cleft area fully lined by mucosal tissue (MI1, first maxillary incisor; MI2, second maxillary incisor; MC, maxillary cleft)
Fig. 2Graft preparation. A Injectable β-TCP/HA putty (Maxresorb inject, Botiss Biomaterials, Berlin, Germany), dentin blocks, and the in situ formed composite dentin/β-TCP mixture in preparation for grafting intervention. B Insertion of the grafting intervention in the alveolar cleft defect at 8 weeks after cleft creation surgery. C Tension-free closure of the oral mucosa over the grafted alveolar cleft defect. D Block sections of the maxilla specimens contained the repaired alveolar clefts 8 weeks after insertion of the grafting intervention
Fig. 3µCT imaging. µCT imaging reconstruction of the created alveolar clefts 8 weeks after cleft creation surgery, and 8 weeks after insertion of the grafting intervention with β-TCP and dentin/β-TCP composite
Results of the µCT measurements
| No. of clefts | Defect size (mm3) | Hounsfield unit (HU) | % bone volume fraction (BV/TV) | Bone mineral density (BMD) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-TCP | 8 | 119.84 ± 32.88 | 3421 ± 103.2 | 60.39 ± 4.5 | 1028 ± 41.87 |
| Dentin/β-TCP | 8 | 151.38 ± 29.53 | 3455 ± 150.3 | 78.46 ± 4.16 | 1185 ± 34.68 |
| Mean difference | − 31.54 ± 15.62 | 33.95 ± 182.3 | 18.07 ± 6.13 | 156.8 ± 53.9 | |
| p value | 0.063 | 0.0121* | 0.0122* | ||
| 95% CI of MD | − 65.05 to 1.97 | 4.726 to 31.42 | 40.4 to 273.30 |
Mean Hounsfield unit (HU), % bone volume fraction (BV/TV), and bone mineral density (BMD) in defect groups, (means ± standard deviations); CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference
* Statistically significant
Fig. 4µCT imaging analysis of the repaired alveolar clefts. a Healed alveolar cleft 8 weeks after insertion of the grafting intervention with β-TCP and dentin/β-TCP, color outlining the residual volume of the grafted area. b Quantitative analysis of bone mineral density (BMD) of defect areas filled with β-TCP or dentin/β-TCP. c Bone volume fraction (%) of the bone volume fraction (BV = bone volume/TV = tissue volume) in the defect area of each group. (* indicates p < 0.05)
Results of histomorphometry measurements
| N | % bone formation | % residual graft | |
|---|---|---|---|
| β-TCP | 8 | 30.08 ± 9.08 | 22.46 ± 2.80 |
| Dentin/β-TCP | 8 | 55.06 ± 7.20 | 47.44 ± 6.72 |
| Mean difference | − 24.98 ± 3.71 | − 28.17 ± 2.92 | |
| p value | 0.0114* | 0.0017* | |
| 95% CI of MD | − 32.93 to − 17.02 | − 37.24 to − 20.73 |
% bone formation = NBA/TDA × 100 and % residual graft = RGA/TDA in defect groups, (means ± standard deviations)
NBA, new bone area; TDA, total defect area; RGA, residual graft area; CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference
* Statistically significant
Fig. 5Histological representation of the repaired alveolar clefts. a Coronal sections of the repaired alveolar clefts 8 weeks after insertion of the grafting intervention stained with Masson’s trichrome and toluidine blue. b Quantitative analysis of percentage bone formation and percentage residual grafts of defect areas filled with β-TCP or dentin/β-TCP. (* indicates p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)
Fig. 6Histological representation of the repaired alveolar clefts. Histological sections of the repaired alveolar clefts 8 weeks after insertion of the grafting intervention stained with Masson’s trichrome (A) and toluidine blue (B). Red arrow: residual dentin; yellow arrow: newly formed bone; fused dentin with bone; orange arrow: resorption lacunae associated with β-TCP