Literature DB >> 20162114

Clinical histology of microimplants placed in two different biomaterials.

Christer Lindgren1, Lars Sennerby, Arne Mordenfeld, Mats Hallman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This randomized, controlled study was designed to compare bone formation around microimplants with a sandblasted, acid-etched surface placed at the time of maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) or deproteinized bovine bone (DBB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine completely edentulous patients and two partially edentulous patients (six women, five men) with a mean age of 67 years (range, 50 to 79 years) requiring bilateral sinus augmentation were included in the study. The patients were randomized for augmentation with BCP (test) in one side and DBB (control) in the contralateral side. At the time of augmentation, one microimplant on each side was placed vertically from the top of the alveolar crest, penetrating the residual bone and the grafting material. After 8 months of graft healing, at the time of ordinary implant placement, all 22 microimplants were retrieved with a surrounding bone core for histologic analyses.
RESULTS: The bone-to-implant contact in the BCP group was 64.6% +/- 9.0%, versus 55.0% +/- 16.0% for the DBB group. The difference was not significant. The corresponding values for the area of newly formed bone in the biopsies were 41.1% +/- 9.8% and 41.6% +/- 14.0% for BCP and DBB, respectively. There were significantly more DBB particles in contact with newly formed bone than BCP particles (87.9 +/- 18.2% versus 53.9 +/- 26.1%; Wilcoxon rank sum test; P = .007).
CONCLUSION: In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, new bone formation and bone-to-implant contact around microimplants with a sandblasted, acid-etched surface was found to be equivalent between sinuses augmented with BCP or DBB. Significantly more DBB particles than BCP particles were in contact with newly formed bone, but the clinical relevance of this has yet to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20162114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  Immunohistochemical analysis of staged guided bone regeneration and osseointegration of titanium implants using a polyethylene glycol membrane.

Authors:  Ilja Mihatovic; Vladimir Golubovic; Jürgen Becker; Frank Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Quantitative Assessment of Posterior Maxillary Arch for Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Solmaz Valizadeh; A Hamid Zafarmand; Sara Hassan Yazdi; Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 3.  Relative performance of various biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bálint Trimmel; Noémi Gede; Péter Hegyi; Zsolt Szakács; Gyöngyi Anna Mezey; Eszter Varga; Márton Kivovics; Lilla Hanák; Zoltán Rumbus; György Szabó
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Bone regeneration using composite non-demineralized xenogenic dentin with beta-tricalcium phosphate in experimental alveolar cleft repair in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Mohammad Kamal; Lars Andersson; Rene Tolba; Adel Al-Asfour; Alexander K Bartella; Felix Gremse; Stefanie Rosenhain; Frank Hölzle; Peter Kessler; Bernd Lethaus
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Zinc phthalocyanine labelled polyethylene glycol: preparation, characterization, interaction with bovine serum albumin and near infrared fluorescence imaging in vivo.

Authors:  Feng Lv; Bo Cao; Yanli Cui; Tianjun Liu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Development of root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement after cleft repair using different grafting materials in rats.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Kristian Kniha; Zuzanna Magnuska; Sachin Chhatwani; Benita Hermanns-Sachweh; Felix Gremse; Frank Hölzle; Gholamreza Danesh; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 3.606

7.  Evaluation of different grafting materials for alveolar cleft repair in the context of orthodontic tooth movement in rats.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Kristian Kniha; Zuzanna Magnuska; Benita Hermanns-Sachweh; Felix Gremse; Frank Hölzle; Gholamreza Danesh; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique-Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull.

Authors:  Punyada Intapibool; Naruporn Monmaturapoj; Katanchalee Nampuksa; Kriangkrai Thongkorn; Pathawee Khongkhunthian
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-01-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.