| Literature DB >> 27489608 |
Olli-Pekka Lappalainen1, Sakari S Karhula2, Marianne Haapea3, Sami Kauppinen2, Mikko Finnilä4, Simo Saarakkala2, Willy Serlo5, George K Sándor1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate bone healing in rabbit critical-sized calvarial defects using two different synthetic scaffold materials, solid biodegradable bioactive glass and tricalcium phosphate granules alongside solid and particulated autogenous bone grafts.Entities:
Keywords: bone regeneration; bone substitutes; bone transplantation; skull
Year: 2016 PMID: 27489608 PMCID: PMC4970504 DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2016.7204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Res ISSN: 2029-283X
Figure 1A = Empty negative control defect showing a minimum of healing with uneven, centric ingrowth from the margins of the defect (arrows) and small bone islets in the center of the defect (arrowhead). Mature intact calvarial bone marked with asterisk.
B = Defect filled with combination of particulated autogenous bone (yellow and orange granules inside of dotted circle) and fibrin glue (dark red areas pointed with arrowhead). Mature intact calvarial bone marked with asterisk.
C = Defect with autologous bone block. The margins of the bone block have been partially resorbed (long arrow) and partial osseous continuity of the margin the bone block can be seen (inside of dotted circle). Mature intact calvarial bone marked with asterisk.
D = Resorbable BAG scaffold in defect (dark red). Ingrowth of new bone from the defect margin can be seen as well as very small ossifying spots in the middle of scaffold material (yellow/orange spots inside of dotted circle). Mature intact calvarial bone marked with asterisk.
E = TCP granules (blue spots pointed with arrowheads) filling a calvarial defect. Bone formation on the material surfaces can be seen (yellow and orange spots pointed with arrows). Mature intact calvarial bone marked with asterisk.
Micro-computed tomography results
| Defect fillings | N | Mean (SD) | Post hoc tests | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pa | Pb | Pc | Pd | |||
| Negative control | 5 | 21.8 (23.7) | ||||
| Particulated bone graft + fibrin glue | 10 | 24.2 (18.7) | 0.768 | |||
| Bone block | 5 | 39 (14.2) | 0.222 | 0.075 | ||
| Solid three-dimensional porous BAG | 4 | 0.21 (0.16) | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.019 | |
| TCP granules | 5 | 3.89 (1.17) | 0.548 | 0.025 | 0.024 | 0.024 |
aSignificance from the analysis of Mann-Whitney test, each filling material compared with negative control.
bComparison of particulated bone graft + fibrin glue vs. bone block, BAG and TCP, Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
cComparison of bone block vs. BAG and TCP, Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
dComparison of BAG vs. TCP, Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
SD = standard deviation; BAG = bioactive glass; TCP = tricalcium phosphate.