Literature DB >> 28392065

Quantitative bias analysis of a reported association between perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and endometriosis: The influence of oral contraceptive use.

Gerard Ngueta1, Matthew P Longnecker2, Miyoung Yoon3, Christopher D Ruark4, Harvey J Clewell5, Melvin E Andersen6, Marc-André Verner7.   

Abstract

An association between serum levels of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and endometriosis has recently been reported in an epidemiologic study. Oral contraceptive use to treat dysmenorrhea (pelvic pain associated with endometriosis) could potentially influence this association by reducing menstrual fluid loss, a route of excretion for PFAS. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the influence of differential oral contraceptive use on the association between PFAS and endometriosis. We used a published life-stage physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to simulate plasma levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) from birth to age at study participation (range 18-44years). In the simulated population, PFAS level distributions matched those for controls in the epidemiologic study. Prevalence and geometric mean duration (standard deviation [SD]) of oral contraceptive use in the simulated women were based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; among the women with endometriosis the values were, respectively, 29% and 6.8 (3.1) years; among those without endometriosis these values were 18% and 5.3 (2.8) years. In simulations, menstrual fluid loss (ml/cycle) in women taking oral contraceptives was assumed to be 56% of loss in non-users. We evaluated the association between simulated plasma PFAS concentration and endometriosis in the simulated population using logistic regression. Based on the simulations, the association between PFAS levels and endometriosis attributable to differential contraceptive use had an odds ratio (95% CI) of 1.05 (1.02, 1.07) for a loge unit increase in PFOA and 1.03 (1.02, 1.05) for PFOS. In comparison, the epidemiologic study reported odds ratios of 1.62 (0.99, 2.66) for PFOA and 1.25 (0.87, 1.80) for PFOS. Our results suggest that the influence of oral contraceptive use on the association between PFAS levels and endometriosis is relatively small.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Endometriosis; Environmental epidemiology; Oral contraceptive use; Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling; Quantitative bias assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28392065     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  4 in total

1.  Oral contraceptive use as a determinant of plasma concentrations of perfluoroalkyl substances among women in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort (MoBa) study.

Authors:  Elise L Rush; Alison B Singer; Matthew P Longnecker; Line S Haug; Azemira Sabaredzovic; Elaine Symanski; Kristina W Whitworth
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 2.  From Environmental to Possible Occupational Exposure to Risk Factors: What Role Do They Play in the Etiology of Endometriosis?

Authors:  Lidia Caporossi; Silvia Capanna; Paola Viganò; Alessandra Alteri; Bruno Papaleo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Development of a Gestational and Lactational Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Model for Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) in Rats and Humans and Its Implications in the Derivation of Health-Based Toxicity Values.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Chou; Zhoumeng Lin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Why is elevation of serum cholesterol associated with exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in humans? A workshop report on potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Melvin E Andersen; Bruno Hagenbuch; Udayan Apte; J Christopher Corton; Tony Fletcher; Christopher Lau; William L Roth; Bart Staels; Gloria L Vega; Harvey J Clewell; Matthew P Longnecker
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.571

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.