Literature DB >> 29274047

Quantitative Analysis of Uncertainty in Medical Reporting: Creating a Standardized and Objective Methodology.

Bruce I Reiner1.   

Abstract

Uncertainty in text-based medical reports has long been recognized as problematic, frequently resulting in misunderstanding and miscommunication. One strategy for addressing the negative clinical ramifications of report uncertainty would be the creation of a standardized methodology for characterizing and quantifying uncertainty language, which could provide both the report author and reader with context related to the perceived level of diagnostic confidence and accuracy. A number of computerized strategies could be employed in the creation of this analysis including string search, natural language processing and understanding, histogram analysis, topic modeling, and machine learning. The derived uncertainty data offers the potential to objectively analyze report uncertainty in real time and correlate with outcomes analysis for the purpose of context and user-specific decision support at the point of care, where intervention would have the greatest clinical impact.

Keywords:  Data mining; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Report uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29274047      PMCID: PMC5873474          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0041-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  14 in total

1.  Impact of filmless radiology on frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; Z Protopapas; F Hooper; H Ghebrekidan; M Scanlon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports?

Authors:  Ramin Khorasani; David W Bates; Susan Teeger; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Douglas F Adams; Steven E Seltzer
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  A crisis in confidence: a combined challenge and opportunity for medical imaging providers.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  Strategies for radiology reporting and communication. Part 1: challenges and heightened expectations.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Commentary: ambiguity and uncertainty: neglected elements of medical education curricula?

Authors:  Vera P Luther; Sonia J Crandall
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Communicating diagnostic uncertainty in surgical pathology reports: disparities between sender and receiver.

Authors:  Sarah W Lindley; Elizabeth M Gillies; Lewis A Hassell
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 7.  Natural Language Processing in Radiology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ewoud Pons; Loes M M Braun; M G Myriam Hunink; Jan A Kors
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Novel solutions for an old disease: diagnosis of acute appendicitis with random forest, support vector machines, and artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Chung-Ho Hsieh; Ruey-Hwa Lu; Nai-Hsin Lee; Wen-Ta Chiu; Min-Huei Hsu; Yu-Chuan Jack Li
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Uncovering and improving upon the inherent deficiencies of radiology reporting through data mining.

Authors:  Bruce Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Hedging their mets: the use of uncertainty terms in clinical documents and its potential implications when sharing the documents with patients.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Yang Liu; Qiaozhu Mei; Frank J Manion; Ulysses J Balis; Kai Zheng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Automated Detection of Radiology Reports that Require Follow-up Imaging Using Natural Language Processing Feature Engineering and Machine Learning Classification.

Authors:  Robert Lou; Darco Lalevic; Charles Chambers; Hanna M Zafar; Tessa S Cook
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical data mining research.

Authors:  Yuanzhang Hu; Zeyun Yu; Xiaoen Cheng; Yue Luo; Chuanbiao Wen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.