Literature DB >> 31482317

Automated Detection of Radiology Reports that Require Follow-up Imaging Using Natural Language Processing Feature Engineering and Machine Learning Classification.

Robert Lou1, Darco Lalevic2, Charles Chambers2, Hanna M Zafar2, Tessa S Cook2.   

Abstract

While radiologists regularly issue follow-up recommendations, our preliminary research has shown that anywhere from 35 to 50% of patients who receive follow-up recommendations for findings of possible cancer on abdominopelvic imaging do not return for follow-up. As such, they remain at risk for adverse outcomes related to missed or delayed cancer diagnosis. In this study, we develop an algorithm to automatically detect free text radiology reports that have a follow-up recommendation using natural language processing (NLP) techniques and machine learning models. The data set used in this study consists of 6000 free text reports from the author's institution. NLP techniques are used to engineer 1500 features, which include the most informative unigrams, bigrams, and trigrams in the training corpus after performing tokenization and Porter stemming. On this data set, we train naive Bayes, decision tree, and maximum entropy models. The decision tree model, with an F1 score of 0.458 and accuracy of 0.862, outperforms both the naive Bayes (F1 score of 0.381) and maximum entropy (F1 score of 0.387) models. The models were analyzed to determine predictive features, with term frequency of n-grams such as "renal neoplasm" and "evalu with enhanc" being most predictive of a follow-up recommendation. Key to maximizing performance was feature engineering that extracts predictive information and appropriate selection of machine learning algorithms based on the feature set.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Binary classification; Follow-up; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Structured reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31482317      PMCID: PMC7064732          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00271-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  16 in total

1.  Named entity recognition of follow-up and time information in 20,000 radiology reports.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Junichi Tsujii; Eric I-Chao Chang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy.

Authors:  Hanchuan Peng; Fuhui Long; Chris Ding
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  Structured radiology reporting: are we there yet?

Authors:  Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Implementation of an Automated Radiology Recommendation-Tracking Engine for Abdominal Imaging Findings of Possible Cancer.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Darco Lalevic; Caroline Sloan; Seetharam C Chadalavada; Curtis P Langlotz; Mitchell D Schnall; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Performance of a Machine Learning Classifier of Knee MRI Reports in Two Large Academic Radiology Practices: A Tool to Estimate Diagnostic Yield.

Authors:  Saeed Hassanpour; Curtis P Langlotz; Timothy J Amrhein; Nicholas T Befera; Matthew P Lungren
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  A text processing pipeline to extract recommendations from radiology reports.

Authors:  Meliha Yetisgen-Yildiz; Martin L Gunn; Fei Xia; Thomas H Payne
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Deep Learning to Classify Radiology Free-Text Reports.

Authors:  Matthew C Chen; Robyn L Ball; Lingyao Yang; Nathaniel Moradzadeh; Brian E Chapman; David B Larson; Curtis P Langlotz; Timothy J Amrhein; Matthew P Lungren
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Quantitative Analysis of Uncertainty in Medical Reporting: Creating a Standardized and Objective Methodology.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Semi-supervised clinical text classification with Laplacian SVMs: an application to cancer case management.

Authors:  Vijay Garla; Caroline Taylor; Cynthia Brandt
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  Structured reporting: if, why, when, how-and at what expense? Results of a focus group meeting of radiology professionals from eight countries.

Authors:  J M L Bosmans; L Peremans; M Menni; A M De Schepper; P O Duyck; P M Parizel
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2012-03-14
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.

Authors:  Yasasvi Tadavarthi; Valeria Makeeva; William Wagstaff; Henry Zhan; Anna Podlasek; Neil Bhatia; Marta Heilbrun; Elizabeth Krupinski; Nabile Safdar; Imon Banerjee; Judy Gichoya; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-02

2.  The Use of BP Neural Network Algorithm and Natural Language Processing in the Impact of Social Audit on Enterprise Innovation Ability.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Xiaomei Wang; Haili Wen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Deep Learning-Based Natural Language Processing in Radiology: The Impact of Report Complexity, Disease Prevalence, Dataset Size, and Algorithm Type on Model Performance.

Authors:  A W Olthof; P M A van Ooijen; L J Cornelissen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 4.  Assessment of Electronic Health Record for Cancer Research and Patient Care Through a Scoping Review of Cancer Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  Liwei Wang; Sunyang Fu; Andrew Wen; Xiaoyang Ruan; Huan He; Sijia Liu; Sungrim Moon; Michelle Mai; Irbaz B Riaz; Nan Wang; Ping Yang; Hua Xu; Jeremy L Warner; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-07

5.  Automatic text classification of actionable radiology reports of tinnitus patients using bidirectional encoder representations from transformer (BERT) and in-domain pre-training (IDPT).

Authors:  Jia Li; Yucong Lin; Pengfei Zhao; Wenjuan Liu; Linkun Cai; Jing Sun; Lei Zhao; Zhenghan Yang; Hong Song; Han Lv; Zhenchang Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 6.  Medical imaging and nuclear medicine: a Lancet Oncology Commission.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; May Abdel-Wahab; Rifat Atun; Miriam Mikhail Lette; Diana Paez; James A Brink; Lluís Donoso-Bach; Guy Frija; Monika Hierath; Ola Holmberg; Pek-Lan Khong; Jason S Lewis; Geraldine McGinty; Wim J G Oyen; Lawrence N Shulman; Zachary J Ward; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Applications of Machine Learning Using Electronic Medical Records in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  John T Schwartz; Michael Gao; Eric A Geng; Kush S Mody; Christopher M Mikhail; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-12-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.