Literature DB >> 12809424

Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports?

Ramin Khorasani1, David W Bates, Susan Teeger, Jeffrey M Rothschild, Douglas F Adams, Steven E Seltzer.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to assess the extent of agreement among radiologists and nonradiologists in perception of diagnostic certainty conveyed by words and phrases commonly used in radiology reports.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed in a large academic radiology department. To determine the commonly used terminology for conveying diagnostic certainty in radiology reports, 12 randomly selected radiologists from six different subspecialties were interviewed. The authors identified the 15 most commonly used words and phrases and included these in random order in a questionnaire sent to all staff radiologists (n = 45) and to 158 referring physicians. Physicians were asked to rank the 15 phrases in order of the diagnostic certainty conveyed by each, from 1 (most certain) to 15 (least certain), using each number only once. The kappa statistic was used to assess agreement in rank order among physicians.
RESULTS: The questionnaire response rate was 76% (n = 34) for radiologists and 49% (n = 78) for nonradiologists. There was excellent agreement among radiologists (kappa = 0.95) and nonradiologists (kappa = 0.93) in the rank order for the phrase diagnostic of. Although there was good agreement (kappa = 0.45) among radiologists for the word unlikely, agreement among nonradiologists was poor (kappa = 0.27). There was very poor agreement among all physicians for the rank order of the other 13 phrases.
CONCLUSION: Among radiologists and nonradiologists, concordance was poor regarding the diagnostic certainty associated with phrases commonly used in radiology reports. Because poor agreement could lead to suboptimal quality of care, the standardization of terminology would benefit all parties.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12809424     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80089-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  21 in total

1.  Unsupervised Topic Modeling in a Large Free Text Radiology Report Repository.

Authors:  Saeed Hassanpour; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support.

Authors:  Jerome A Osheroff; Jonathan M Teich; Blackford Middleton; Elaine B Steen; Adam Wright; Don E Detmer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  General practitioners' views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Anders Baerheim
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 4.  LI-RADS: Future Directions.

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-04-13

5.  The need for standardization of nuclear cardiology reporting and data system (NCAD-RADS): Learning from coronary artery disease (CAD), breast imaging (BI), liver imaging (LI), and prostate imaging (PI) RADS.

Authors:  Majid Assadi; Erik Velez; Mohammad Hosein Najafi; Ali Gholamrezanezhad
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Efficacy of a checklist-style structured radiology reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Eaton Lin; Daniel K Powell; Nolan J Kagetsu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder - improvement of report quality?

Authors:  Sebastian Gassenmaier; Marco Armbruster; Florian Haasters; Tobias Helfen; Thomas Henzler; Sedat Alibek; Dominik Pförringer; Wieland H Sommer; Nora N Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Quantitative Analysis of Uncertainty in Medical Reporting: Creating a Standardized and Objective Methodology.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center.

Authors:  Bonmyong Lee; Hansel J Otero; Matthew T Whitehead
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-29

Review 10.  The challenges, opportunities, and imperative of structured reporting in medical imaging.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.