| Literature DB >> 29273739 |
Dimitri Fayolle1, Emiliano Altamura2, Alice D'Onofrio1, Warren Madanamothoo1, Bernard Fenet1, Fabio Mavelli2, René Buchet1, Pasquale Stano3, Michele Fiore4, Peter Strazewski5.
Abstract
It is an open question how the chemical structure of prebiotic vesicle-forming amphiphiles complexified to produce robust primitive compartments that could safely host foreign molecules. Previous work suggests that comparingly labile vesicles composed of plausibly prebiotic fatty acids were eventually chemically transformed withEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29273739 PMCID: PMC5741756 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18053-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Summary of the two investigated phosphorylation reactions and structures of the obtained compounds (R = oleoyl chain), followed by the hydration of the crude reaction mixtures: rac-DOG (1) in the presence of cyanamide (2a) or urea (2b) undergoes two phosphorylation reactions with ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (3a) and with 2-aminoethyl phosphate (3b) to give rac-DOPA (4a) and, respectively, rac-DOPE (5). Five by-products were identified in the Mix A: rac-MOPA (4b), isourea 6, rac-MOG (7a), sec-MOG (7b) and oleic acid (OA, 8) and four (6, 7a,b and 8) in the Mix B. Compounds 1, 4a, 4b, 5 and 7a are 1:1 mixtures of two enantiomers: rac-DOG (1) = 1,2-dioleyl-sn-glycerol + 2,3-dioleoyl-sn-glycerol; rac-DOPA (4a) = 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate + 2,3-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-1-phosphate; rac-MOPA (4b) = 1-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate + 3-oleoyl-sn-glycero-1-phosphate; rac-DOPE (5) = 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine + 2,3-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-1-phosphoethanolamine; rac-MOG (7a) = 2,3-sn-dihydroxypropyl-1-oleate + 1,2-sn-dihydroxypropyl-3-oleate.
Vesicles prepared from hydration of plausibly prebiotic lipid mixtures.
| Crude mixtures | OA | MOG | DOG | MOPA | DOPA | DOPE | Vesicles?c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 7aa + 7b | 1a | 4ba | 4aa | 5a | ||
|
| |||||||
| Mix A | 3.3 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.4b | 3.8 | mostly | |
| Mix B | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 3.1 | no | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| |||||||
| M1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | mostly | ||
| M2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | no | ||
| M3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | mostly | ||
| M4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | no | ||
| N1 | 8 | 2 | mostly | ||||
| N2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | no | |||
| N3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | mostly | ||
| N4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | partially | ||
| N5 | 2 | 2 | 6 | partially | |||
| N6 | 2 | 8 | partially | ||||
| N7 | 10 | yes | |||||
aRacemic compounds; bEstimated from TOCSY integrals; cAll mixtures have been hydrated with 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 containing 200 mM sucrose, except Mix B, M2 and M4 which have been hydrated with 200 mM Na-bicine pH 8.5 containing 200 mM sucrose. An isotonic sucrose/glucose density difference was used for the reliable microscopic imaging and counting of GVs; see supplementary documentation, paragraphs I.1 and I.2 for details on the preparation of GVs from Mix A and B and for N1–N7.
Figure 2(A) 1HNMR recorded at 500 MHz in CDCl3; chemical shift region for protons bound to carbon atoms in α-position to an oxygen atom or part of a –C=C– double bond, i.e. glycerol –CH– and –CH2– groups and Z–CH=CH– of the oleoyl chains. a) commercial oleic acid; b) Commercial DOPE; c) Commercial DOPA; d) rac-DOG (1); e) rac-MOG (7a) that contains traces of sec-MOG (7b, indicated by an arrow); f) Mix B (containing 1, 5, 7a, 7b and 8); g) Mix A (containing 1, 4a, 4b, 7a, 7b and 8); Asterisks indicate the secondary hydrogen atom of the glycerol backbone. Small amounts of adduct 6 were identified only by ESI-MS and formed only when 2a was used as an activator. (B) TOCSY (500 MHz, CDCl3, region 5.5–3.0 ppm) of crude extract of Mix A containing 1, 4a, 4b 7a, 7b and 8. The green circles represent the 2D integration of the central glycerol backbone CH proton signal. In 1H NMR of Mix A (Figure 2Ag) the signals of 4a and 4b overlap.
Figure 3Left side: Infrared spectra of crude mixtures containing rac-DOPA (4a, top lane) obtained under prebiotic conditions compared to that of commercial DOPA (middle lane) and commercial NH4H2PO4 (3a, bottom lane). Right side: Infrared spectra of crude mixture containing rac-DOPE (5, top lane) obtained under prebiotic conditions compared to that of commercial DOPE (middle lane) and commercial 2-aminoethyl phosphate (3b, bottom lane). All samples were analyzed in 100 mM tris buffer pH = 7.8.
Figure 4(a) GVs obtained from the gentle hydration of crude reaction mixture Mix A. GVs were further characterized by flow cytometry (see Fig. 3 and Table S2). (b) Size distribution analysis, as obtained by image analysis, of GVs prepared from the lipid mixture Mix A. The experimental distribution (grey bars) has been fitted with a log-normal curve (red line). The population is described by the following mean radius ± standard deviation: 2.2 ± 0.8 (n = 1826). Confocal microscopy images of calcein-filled GVs were firstly thresholded in order to distinguish GVs from background (on the basis of calcein fluorescence). The resulting binary image was analyzed for object recognition by the proprietary image J algorithm applying a shape filter (0.8 < circularity < 1.0). As outcome, a set of Region Of Interest (ROI) was obtained and overlayed over the initial picture, from which the GVs radii were obtained after a proper pixel-to-micrometer calibration. (c) The possible chemical pathway that converts oleic acid to phosphatidic acid realizes a combinatorial chemical space made of the four indicated amphiphilic compounds. (d) Hydration of lipid mixtures N1 to N7 gave, depending on their composition (cf. Table 1), GVs (green with or without orange-red membrane) and non-vesicle aggregates, i.e. red/orange filled objects without aqueous (green) internal volumes. In both cases vesicles were prepared by the slow hydration of the lipid mixtures in the presence of green-fluorescent calcein as water-soluble probe and small amounts (0.01–0.2 mol%) of co-hydrating commercial (enantiopure) DOPE-Rh as orange-fluorescent lipid derivative for membrane staining.
Figure 5Flow cytometry analysis of vesicles obtained from the hydration of Mix A. (a) The whole vesicle population has been partitioned in two sub-populations (P1 and P2) on the basis of the appearance of the side-scattering (SSC) vs. forward-scattering (FSC) contour plot; (b) green fluorescence (FITC) vs. FSC dotplot reveals two well distinguished populations, centered at fluorescence values of 103 a.u. in the FITC channel, with a minor number of vesicles whose fluorescence is above an arbitrary threshold level of 104 a.u.; (c) histogram of vesicle distribution over FSC values, revealing partially overlapping sub-populations; (d) histogram of vesicle distribution over the SSC values, revealing a good separation among the two sub-populations according to the SSC parameter; (e) histogram of vesicle distribution over the FITC values, where the value of 104 a.u. has been used as threshold in order to distinguish normally-filled vesicles (green fluorescence <104 a.u.), termed p11 and p21, and highly-filled vesicles (green fluorescence >104 a.u.), termed p12 and p22. Note that P1 = p11 + p12, and P2 = p21 + p22. The quantitative analysis of vesicle populations is reported in Table S2.