Literature DB >> 2927312

The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: now you see it, now you don't.

M L Millis, S B Button.   

Abstract

Gernsbacher (1984) found that number of word meanings (polysemy) did not influence lexical decision time when it was operationalized as number of dictionary definitions. This finding supports her contention that subjects do not store all possible dictionary meanings for words in memory. The present experiments extended Gernsbacher's research by determining whether more psychologically valid measures of polysemy affect lexical decision time. Three metrics were used to represent the meanings that subjects actually access from memory (accessible polysemy): (1) the first meanings subjects think of when asked to define stimulus words, (2) all the meanings subjects generate for words, and (3) the average number of meanings subjects generate. The results showed that the second and third metrics of polysemy influenced lexical decision time, whereas the first metric (representing mostly the access to dominant meanings for words) only approached significance.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2927312     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  2 in total

1.  Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access.

Authors:  K I Forster; E S Bednall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-01

2.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-06
  2 in total
  13 in total

1.  Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax-semantics interface.

Authors:  M M Piñango; E Zurif; R Jackendoff
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1999-07

2.  Frequency of meaning use for ambiguous and unambiguous words.

Authors:  Z M Griffin
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-08

3.  Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.

Authors:  C D Piercey; S Joordens
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

4.  The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks.

Authors:  Penny M Pexman; Stephen J Lupker; Yasushi Hino
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

5.  Semantic neighborhood effects on the recognition of ambiguous words.

Authors:  Lawrence Locker; Greg B Simpson; Mark Yates
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

6.  Comparing nouns and verbs in a lexical task.

Authors:  Françoise Cordier; Jean-Claude Croizet; François Rigalleau
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-02

7.  Ambiguity advantage revisited: two meanings are better than one when accessing Chinese nouns.

Authors:  Chien-Jer Charles Lin; Kathleen Ahrens
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-07-07

8.  Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words.

Authors:  Bernadet Jager; Alexandra A Cleland
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-02

9.  Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?

Authors:  Juan Haro; Pilar Ferré
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

10.  Semantic Ambiguity Effects in L2 Word Recognition.

Authors:  Tomomi Ishida
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.