Literature DB >> 2926696

Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension.

S M Garnsey1, M K Tanenhaus, R M Chapman.   

Abstract

Evoked brain potentials were used to monitor moment-by-moment decisions during language comprehension. Subjects read sentences containing temporary syntactic ambiguities for which one of the possible interpretations was semantically implausible. The N400 component of the evoked potential, which is sensitive to implausibility, was used to discover when during a sentence subjects made a decision about the ambiguity. The results demonstrate that readers try to interpret a syntactic ambiguity early in a sentence rather than waiting for disambiguating information. This introduces a new way to use brain activity to study sentence comprehension processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2926696     DOI: 10.1007/BF01069046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  11 in total

1.  Multiple comparisons in psychological research.

Authors:  T A RYAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Lexical structure in Parsing long-distance dependencies.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; J Boland; S M Garnsey; G N Carlson
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1989-01

3.  The use of syntactic information in filling gaps.

Authors:  C Clifton; L Frazier
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1986-05

4.  A note on some psychological evidence and alternative grammars.

Authors:  M Ford; M Dalrymple
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-06

5.  An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts.

Authors:  M Besson; F Macar
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-09

Review 7.  Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification.

Authors:  I Fischler; P A Bloom; D G Childers; S E Roucos; N W Perry
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Jan 12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Semantic categorization and event-related potentials.

Authors:  J Polich
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  J Nicol; D Swinney
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1989-01

2.  Lexical projection and the interaction of syntax and semantics in parsing.

Authors:  J E Boland; M K Tanenhaus; G Carlson; S M Garnsey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1989-11

3.  Comprehending semantic and grammatical violations in Italian. N400 and P600 comparison with visual and auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Michela Balconi; Uberto Pozzoli
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-01

4.  The on-line study of sentence comprehension: an examination of dual task paradigms.

Authors:  Janet Nicol; David Swinney; Tracy Love; Lea Hald
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-05

5.  Heavy NP shift is the parser's last resort: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Syntactic and thematic constraint effects on blood oxygenation level dependent signal correlates of comprehension of relative clauses.

Authors:  David Caplan; Louise Stanczak; Gloria Waters
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Pronominal resolution and gap filling in agrammatic aphasia: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Jungwon Janet Choy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-04-16

9.  Task-dependent and task-independent neurovascular responses to syntactic processing.

Authors:  David Caplan; Evan Chen; Gloria Waters
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Bilingual deaf readers' use of semantic and syntactic cues in the processing of English relative clauses.

Authors:  Pilar Piñar; Matthew T Carlson; Jill P Morford; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2016-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.