Literature DB >> 19370416

Pronominal resolution and gap filling in agrammatic aphasia: evidence from eye movements.

Cynthia K Thompson1, Jungwon Janet Choy.   

Abstract

This paper reports the results of three studies examining comprehension and real-time processing of pronominal (Experiment 1) and Wh-movement (Experiments 2 and 3) structures in agrammatic and unimpaired speakers using eyetracking. We asked the following questions: (a) Is off-line comprehension of these constructions impaired in agrammatic listeners?, (b) Do agrammatic, like unimpaired, listeners show eye movement patterns indicative of automatic pronominal reference resolution and/or gap-filling?, and (c) Do eyetracking patterns differ when sentences are correctly versus incorrectly interpreted, or do automatic processes prevail in spite of comprehension failure? Results showed that off-line comprehension of both pronoun and Wh-movement structures was impaired in our agrammatic cohort. However, the aphasic participants showed visual evidence of real-time reference resolution as they processed binding structures, including both pronouns and reflexives, as did our unimpaired control participants. Similarly, both the patients and the control participants showed patterns consistent with successful gap filling during processing of Wh-movement structures. For neither pronominal nor movement structures did we find evidence of delayed processing. Notably, these patterns were found for the aphasic participants even when they incorrectly interpreted target sentences, with the exception of object relative constructions. For incorrectly interpreted sentences, we found end of sentence lexical competition effects. These findings indicate that aberrant lexical integration, rather than representational deficits or generally slowed processing, may underlie agrammatic aphasic listener's comprehension failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19370416      PMCID: PMC2823636          DOI: 10.1007/s10936-009-9105-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  28 in total

1.  Binding in agrammatic aphasia: Processing to comprehension.

Authors:  Jungwon Janet Choy; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  Understanding ambiguous words in sentence contexts: electrophysiological evidence for delayed contextual selection in Broca's aphasia.

Authors:  T Y Swaab; C Brown; P Hagoort
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Trace deletion, theta-roles, and cognitive strategies.

Authors:  Y Grodzinsky
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasic patients in sentence-picture matching tasks.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters; N Hildebrandt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension.

Authors:  S M Garnsey; M K Tanenhaus; R M Chapman
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1989-01

6.  Language deficits and the theory of syntax.

Authors:  Y Grodzinsky
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 7.  Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency.

Authors:  G Mauner; V A Fromkin; T L Cornell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia.

Authors:  E Zurif; D Swinney; P Prather; J Solomon; C Bushell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  The breakdown of binding relations.

Authors:  Y Grodzinsky; K Wexler; Y C Chien; S Marakovitz; J Solomon
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics.

Authors:  M C Linebarger; M F Schwartz; E M Saffran
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-05
View more
  30 in total

1.  Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-10

2.  Binding in agrammatic aphasia: Processing to comprehension.

Authors:  Jungwon Janet Choy; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.773

3.  Tracking Passive Sentence Comprehension in Agrammatic Aphasia.

Authors:  Aaron M Meyer; Jennifer E Mack; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 1.710

4.  Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers.

Authors:  Jiyeon Lee; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011-10-01

5.  Effects of word frequency and modality on sentence comprehension impairments in people with aphasia.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Effects of Verb Bias and Syntactic Ambiguity on Reading in People with Aphasia.

Authors:  Gayle Dede
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.773

7.  Deficit-lesion correlations in syntactic comprehension in aphasia.

Authors:  David Caplan; Jennifer Michaud; Rebecca Hufford; Nikos Makris
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Online Sentence Reading in People With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Jessica Knilans; Gayle DeDe
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Effects of verb meaning on lexical integration in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Woohyuk Ji; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.