Literature DB >> 17047731

Heavy NP shift is the parser's last resort: Evidence from eye movements.

Adrian Staub, Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier.   

Abstract

Two eye movement experiments explored the roles of verbal subcategorization possibilities and transitivity biases in the processing of heavy NP shift sentences in which the verb's direct object appears to the right of a post-verbal phrase. In Experiment 1, participants read sentences in which a prepositional phrase immediately followed the verb, which was either obligatorily transitive or had a high transitivity bias (e.g., Jack praised/watched from the stands his daughter's attempt to shoot a basket). Experiment 2 compared unshifted sentences to sentences in which an adverb intervened between the verb and its object, and obligatorily transitive verbs to optionally transitive verbs with widely varying transitivity biases. In both experiments, evidence of processing difficulty appeared on the material that intervened between the verb and its object when the verb was obligatorily transitive, and on the shifted direct object when the verb was optionally transitive, regardless of transitivity bias. We conclude that the parser adopts the heavy NP shift analysis only when it is forced to by the grammar, which we interpret in terms of a preference for immediate incremental interpretation.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 17047731      PMCID: PMC1615890          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  13 in total

1.  Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-09

Review 2.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons.

Authors:  Susanne Gahl; Dan Jurafsky; Douglas Roland
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

4.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

5.  Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency.

Authors:  M J Spivey; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.

Authors:  F Ferreira; J M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension.

Authors:  S M Garnsey; M K Tanenhaus; R M Chapman
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1989-01

8.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; A D Well
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; M K Tanenhaus; C Kello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Regressive eye movements and sentence parsing: on the use of regression-contingent analyses.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Information density and dependency length as complementary cognitive models.

Authors:  Michael Xavier Collins
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-10

3.  The processing of extraposed structures in English.

Authors:  Roger Levy; Evelina Fedorenko; Mara Breen; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-10-27

4.  It's not just the "heavy NP": relative phrase length modulates the production of heavy-NP shift.

Authors:  Lynne M Stallings; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-06

5.  Still no phonological typicality effect on word reading time (and no good explanation of one, either): a rejoinder to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Margaret Grant; Charles Clifton; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Expectation and Locality Effects in German Verb-final Structures.

Authors:  Roger P Levy; Frank Keller
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Processing Relative Clause Extractions in Swedish.

Authors:  Damon Tutunjian; Fredrik Heinat; Eva Klingvall; Anna-Lena Wiklund
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.