Literature DB >> 29255139

Telluriding monolayer MoS2 and WS2 via alkali metal scooter.

Seok Joon Yun1,2, Gang Hee Han1, Hyun Kim1,2, Dinh Loc Duong1, Bong Gyu Shin1, Jiong Zhao3, Quoc An Vu1,2, Jubok Lee1,2, Seung Mi Lee4, Young Hee Lee5,6,7.   

Abstract

The conversion of chalcogen atoms to other types in transition metal dichalcogenides has significant advantages for tuning bandgaps and constructing in-plane heterojunctions; however, difficulty arises from the conversion of sulfur or selenium to tellurium atoms owing to the low decomposition temperature of tellurides. Here, we propose the use of sodium for converting monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) to molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2) under Te-rich vapors. Sodium easily anchors tellurium and reduces the exchange barrier energy by scooting the tellurium to replace sulfur. The conversion was initiated at the edges and grain boundaries of MoS2, followed by complete conversion in the entire region. By controlling sodium concentration and reaction temperature of monolayer MoS2, we tailored various phases such as semiconducting 2H-MoTe2, metallic 1T'-MoTe2, and 2H-MoS2-x Te x alloys. This concept was further extended to WS2. A high valley polarization of ~37% in circularly polarized photoluminescence was obtained in the monolayer WS2-x Te x alloy at room temperature.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29255139      PMCID: PMC5735184          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02238-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


Introduction

Two-dimensional monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMdCs) have unique growth behaviors that are different from bulk. While chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is commonly introduced to grow various types of TMdCs[1-4], the conversion process is also available by the substitutional reaction of chalcogen atoms[5-7]. For example, monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is converted to molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2) by a heat treatment under Se-rich conditions or vice versa[6]. This method is useful for doping, alloying, spin-orbit coupling (SOC) engineering[8], and generating heterointerfaces by selective patterning[5]. Difficulty exists, however, in the Te-conversion case due to the low decomposition temperature of tellurides and the lower activity of Te atoms with transition metals than that of sulfur or selenium atoms. Recently, molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2) and tungsten ditelluride (WTe2) have been intensively investigated due to their unique phase engineering[9] and novel physical nature of Weyl semimetals and topological insulators[10,11]. Moreover, MoS2Te and WS2−Te alloys with tailored SOC will further elucidate such exotic physical phenomena. To fulfill these needs, Te conversion at low conversion temperatures should be designed. In this work, we demonstrate efficient tellurization process for converting monolayer MoS2 and WS2 to their tellurides via sodium-scooter (Na2Te) reaction. The Na2Te scooter acts as a telluriding catalyst in which the activation barrier height for tellurization or tellurization temperature is drastically reduced to 0.73 eV or 300 °C by introducing Na-scooter. This reduction of conversion temperature leads to lower the reaction temperature as low as 525 °C, which is below the dissociation temperature of MoTe2 (700 °C), the key to stabilize the converted tellurides. Tellurization occurs primarily at the edge and grain boundaries of MoS2 flakes. This leads to fabricate lateral heterostructure between MoS2 and 2H-MoTe2. Furthermore, we obtain MoS2Te alloy, 2H, and 1T′-MoTe2 phase by adjusting tellurization parameters and construct a phase modulation diagram with Na-scooter concentration and telluriding temperature. The bandgap and SOC can be engineered by Te composition. The partially tellurized WS2 sample reveals high valley polarization up to 37% at room temperature.

Results

Telluriding molybdenum disulfide by sodium-assisted tellurization process

Figure 1a is a schematic of the sodium-assisted tellurization process for MoS2. A sodium hydroxide (NaOH)-coated substrate was brought into a chamber with a CVD-grown monolayer MoS2 sample and the two were placed facing each other in the tellurization zone (see Methods section and Supplementary Figure 1). The Na2Te, which is most probable Na–Te compound, converted from NaOH while supplying a Te vapor (Supplementary Figure 2 and Supplementary Note 1) is scooted to the MoS2 substrate to exchange Te atoms with S atoms (Fig. 1b). Other compounds such as NaTe and NaTe3 were negligibly formed during tellurization of NaOH (Supplementary Figure 2c). In fact, Na2Te is a well-established compound as an efficient tellurizing reagent[12]. Due to its higher reactivity of Na2Te than pure Te, Na2Te is widely used for synthesizing various telluride compounds[13,14].
Fig. 1

Alkali-metal-assisted conversion from MoS2 to MoTe2. a Schematic of the Na-assisted tellurization process. MoS2 was flipped over to face the NaOH-coated substrate. b Illustration for the conversion step from Mo–S to Mo–Te via a Na-scooter. Na2Te, which is regarded as the most probable Na–Te compound from sodium hydroxide, plays a role as the Te carrier and catalyst for exchanging with S atoms. After exchanging S atoms with Te atoms, Na2S is converted to Na2Te under Te-rich conditions. c Gibbs free energy changes for conversion without/with Na-scooter. ∆G is reduced to around 70 kJ mol−1. d, e Raman spectra (d) and XPS taken for Mo, S, and Te (e) of partially tellurized MoS2−Te without/with Na-scooter at 600 °C for 30 min

Alkali-metal-assisted conversion from MoS2 to MoTe2. a Schematic of the Na-assisted tellurization process. MoS2 was flipped over to face the NaOH-coated substrate. b Illustration for the conversion step from Mo–S to Mo–Te via a Na-scooter. Na2Te, which is regarded as the most probable Na–Te compound from sodium hydroxide, plays a role as the Te carrier and catalyst for exchanging with S atoms. After exchanging S atoms with Te atoms, Na2S is converted to Na2Te under Te-rich conditions. c Gibbs free energy changes for conversion without/with Na-scooter. ∆G is reduced to around 70 kJ mol−1. d, e Raman spectra (d) and XPS taken for Mo, S, and Te (e) of partially tellurized MoS2Te without/with Na-scooter at 600 °C for 30 min The reduction in the barrier height for the proposed conversion reaction via the Na-scooter (Na2Te) is understood by calculating the Gibbs free energy (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 1). In the presence of a Na-scooter (or efficient carrier), the conversion of MoS2 to MoTe2 requires around 70 kJ mol−1 less Gibbs free energy (equivalent to 300 °C or 0.73 eV by the Readhead equation[15]) than a conversion without Na. It can also be assumed that the reaction temperature at 900 °C without a Na-scooter is reduced to 500 °C in the presence of a Na-scooter (black line). This temperature reduction for tellurization is crucial to stabilize the MoTe2, since the decomposition temperature of MoTe2 is around 700 °C[16] (Supplementray Table 2). In this sense, Na-scooter plays as both an efficient Te carrier and catalyst. Although the Gibbs free energy is still positive, such a reaction could occur under Te-rich conditions at a reasonable temperature. The formed Na2S could be converted back to Na2Te under Te-rich conditions (bottom-orange curve), guaranteeing continuous tellurization. There is still a trace of conversion to MoTe2 even without a Na-scooter over 650 °C; however, the converted MoTe2 would be etched and dissociated (Supplementary Figure 3). The proposed mechanism is confirmed by Raman spectroscopy and X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) for the tellurized MoS2 prepared with/without NaOH. The A1g and E1 2g modes of the 2H-MoS2 phase observed near 402 and 383 cm−1, respectively, in the absence of a Na-scooter, are identical to those of the pristine monolayer MoS2. Meanwhile, the E1 2g (240 cm−1) mode of 2H-MoTe2 and some unknown peak (near 350 cm−1 in the red-dotted circle) clearly appeared with the Na-scooter (bottom). The remaining MoS2 peak is red-shifted by 9 cm−1 for E1 2g, indicating a compressive strain in the MoS2 [17] (see supplementary Figure 6 for more information). The peak shift is negligible for A1g, indicating no appreciable charge transfer. This implies that the obtained sample is in a form of the MoS2Te alloy. More distinct features of the conversion were demonstrated from XPS analysis. While Te peaks were absent from the sample without a Na-scooter, clear Te peaks were identified with red-shifted (0.4 eV) Mo 3d peaks in the Na-assisted tellurized sample (Fig. 1e). The lowered Fermi level indicates electron withdrawal[18]. Tellurium oxide peaks were also visible, indicating that the sample is easily oxidized under ambient conditions.

Time evolution of tellurization process

Figure 2a displays the optical images and corresponding schematics for the time evolution of tellurization for MoS2. No change in the optical contrast is seen in the sample tellurized for 5 min compared with pristine MoS2. When the tellurization time is prolonged to 10 min, dark-colored regions start emerging mostly at the edges and grain boundaries. The exposed dangling bonds at the edge and some defect sites such as grain boundaries and S vacancies are known to have higher reactivity than the basal surface of MoS2. In this sense, tellurization takes place preferentially at the edge and grain boundaries in MoS2. The area of the dark regions is diffused and widened from the edge to the entire area of the flakes at 15 min of tellurization (yellow-dashed circle in Fig. 2b). If the flake size is large, the longer reaction time is needed for full conversion (white-dashed box in Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2

Time evolution of conversion from MoS2 to MoTe2. a Optical images and the corresponding schematics of the initial growth stages: 5, 10, and 15 min. The dark color indicates the fully converted MoTe2 region from MoS2. Conversion is favored at the edges and grain boundaries; scale bars, 50 μm. b Amplified optical image of the sample grown for 15 min. The MoS2 flake is completely converted to MoTe2 in the yellow-dotted circle; scale bars, 50 μm. c, d XPS mapping image of tellurized MoS2 flake for S 2p3/2 (c) and Te 3d5/2 (d) in the white-dotted square in b; scale bars, 30 μm. A high Te content was detected in the dark region (no sulfur content was detected), while the S content (~ 20%) is seen in the bright region. e Raman spectra of bright and dark regions. The dark region shows the Raman spectrum exclusively from MoTe2 (1T′−2H mixed phase). Some unknown peaks (349 and 435 cm−1 in red circles) in the bright region, which are far from MoS2 and MoTe2 Raman peaks are observed

Time evolution of conversion from MoS2 to MoTe2. a Optical images and the corresponding schematics of the initial growth stages: 5, 10, and 15 min. The dark color indicates the fully converted MoTe2 region from MoS2. Conversion is favored at the edges and grain boundaries; scale bars, 50 μm. b Amplified optical image of the sample grown for 15 min. The MoS2 flake is completely converted to MoTe2 in the yellow-dotted circle; scale bars, 50 μm. c, d XPS mapping image of tellurized MoS2 flake for S 2p3/2 (c) and Te 3d5/2 (d) in the white-dotted square in b; scale bars, 30 μm. A high Te content was detected in the dark region (no sulfur content was detected), while the S content (~ 20%) is seen in the bright region. e Raman spectra of bright and dark regions. The dark region shows the Raman spectrum exclusively from MoTe2 (1T′−2H mixed phase). Some unknown peaks (349 and 435 cm−1 in red circles) in the bright region, which are far from MoS2 and MoTe2 Raman peaks are observed To analyze the chemical composition in conjunction with the optical contrast, we conducted XPS mapping for a sample tellurized for 15 min (white-dashed square, Fig. 2b). The outer region shows a relatively dark optical contrast compared to the inner region. Figure 2c and d shows XPS mapping images for S 2p3/2 and Te 3d5/2 (Supplementary Figure 4). S 2p3/2 peaks were detected only in the bright region, while Te 3d5/2 peaks were rich in the dark region. The calculated chemical compositions of Te/(S + Te) are 0.8 and 1 for the bright region and dark region, respectively (Supplementary Figure 5). The negligible sulfur content in the dark region indicates that MoS2 is fully converted to MoTe2, while the bright region still has remaining sulfur atoms. A similar trend is also observed in the Raman spectra (Fig. 2e) The bright region reveals the MoS2Te alloy peaks with a MoTe2-like peak near 227 cm−1 , a MoS2-like peak near 395 cm−1 and unknown peaks in red circles. To clarify the peak near 227 cm−1, the peak was deconvoluted to LA(M) mode[19] for 2H-MoS2 and E1 2g mode for 2H-MoTe2 (more details are discussed in Fig. 3g and Supplementary Figure 6). Meanwhile, the dark region shows a uniquely MoTe2 feature.
Fig. 3

Atomic structure of monolayer MoS2−Te with Te–S species. a Low-magnification TEM image of the tellurized MoS2 flake on a 1.2-μm hole Cu grid; scale bar, 10 μm. b Electron diffraction pattern from the corresponding positions in (a); scale bars, 5 nm−1. c Another hexagonal phase emerges from 3, revealing the MoTe2 phase with a 0.340 nm lattice constant, in addition to MoS2 with a lattice constant of 0.304 nm; scale bar, 5 nm−1. d Schematics for three representative atomic phases of MoS2, MoS1Te1 (Te–S), and MoTe2. Annular dark field (ADF) STEM image with the corresponding intensity line profile of four species (white circle for S–S, yellow circle for Te–S, red circle for Te–Te, and sky-blue for the Mo site), which is distinguished by brightness; scale bar, 1 nm. e False-color FFT filtered images of regions 1 and 3 in a. Te–S and Te–Te in the chalcogen site marked by a yellow and red circle, respectively; scale bars, 2 nm. f Two types of Te–S arrangement in monolayer MoS1Te1 structure. g Analysis of Raman spectrum for MoS2−Te alloy with calculated vibrational modes of Janus phase and randomly distributed Te–S in monolayer MoS1Te1

Atomic structure of monolayer MoS2Te with Te–S species. a Low-magnification TEM image of the tellurized MoS2 flake on a 1.2-μm hole Cu grid; scale bar, 10 μm. b Electron diffraction pattern from the corresponding positions in (a); scale bars, 5 nm−1. c Another hexagonal phase emerges from 3, revealing the MoTe2 phase with a 0.340 nm lattice constant, in addition to MoS2 with a lattice constant of 0.304 nm; scale bar, 5 nm−1. d Schematics for three representative atomic phases of MoS2, MoS1Te1 (Te–S), and MoTe2. Annular dark field (ADF) STEM image with the corresponding intensity line profile of four species (white circle for S–S, yellow circle for Te–S, red circle for TeTe, and sky-blue for the Mo site), which is distinguished by brightness; scale bar, 1 nm. e False-color FFT filtered images of regions 1 and 3 in a. Te–S and TeTe in the chalcogen site marked by a yellow and red circle, respectively; scale bars, 2 nm. f Two types of Te–S arrangement in monolayer MoS1Te1 structure. g Analysis of Raman spectrum for MoS2Te alloy with calculated vibrational modes of Janus phase and randomly distributed Te–S in monolayer MoS1Te1

Tellurization of molybdenum disulfide in atomic scale

To study the tellurization of MoS2 at the atomic scale, we conducted transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Figure 3a is the low-magnification TEM image of a tellurized MoS2 flake grown at 625 °C and NaOH concentration of 1 μmol cm−2 for 30 min. Electron diffraction patterns of the hexagon (Fig. 3b) are confirmed for each region indicated in Fig. 3a. Two features are noted here: (i) at low Te loading content, MoS2Te alloy still maintains single crystallinity within the inner region of triangular flakes (marked by number 1, 2, and 3). (ii) Additional hexagon emergent in region 3 (expanded pattern in Fig. 3c) with a lattice constant of 0.34 nm for a lattice, equivalent to a MoTe2 phase in addition to the MoS2 phase (a = 0.306 nm), while maintaining the same orientation as MoS2. When more Te content is converted (region 4) (i.e., on both sides), MoTe2 may suffer from local strain, deviating the orientation of the hexagon. Three different phases of MoS2, MoS1Te1, and MoTe2 are schematically drawn in the top panel (Fig. 3d). The annular dark field scanning TEM (ADF-STEM) image (middle panel) reveals three such types of intensity distributions; the brightest intensity spot in the chalcogen site corresponds to TeTe (red circle), the middle intensity corresponds to Te–S (yellow circle), and the dark spot corresponds to S–S species (white circle). Such species were identified by comparing each intensity to the Mo intensity (bottom panel and Supplementary Figure 7). The false-colored fast-Fourier transform (FFT) filtered image (Fig. 3e) of region 1 clearly demonstrates a few spots of Te–S and one TeTe spot. Meanwhile, at spot 3, more TeTe species were emergent with a large portion of Te–S species. In this case, the intensity of Mo atoms adjacent to Te atoms is exaggerated by artificial filtering (Supplementary Figure 8). It is not clear from STEM analysis if Te atoms in MoS1Te1 are located on the top or bottom of Mo layer. There are two possible arrangements of Te–S species in MoS1Te1 structure during conversion from MoS2 to MoTe2 (Fig. 3f). One is called Janus phase, where S atoms at the top layer is replaced by Te atoms while retaining the bottom S layer, which is consistent with recently reported phase of MoS1Se1 [20]. In addition, there is another possibility of combination, called randomly distributed phase. The total Te coverage is still half but part of Te atoms are located on top and bottom layer, distinguished from Janus phase. The corresponding Raman spectrum for MoS2Te alloy is provided with calculated vibrational modes of Janus phase and randomly distributed phase in Fig. 3g. Although the theoretical peaks calculated from density functional theory (DFT) represent experimental peaks to a some degree, the precise assignment of the spectra to either Janus or random phase is premature at the moment (more detail in Supplementary Figure 6). This ambiguity is partly ascribed to insufficient coverage of MoS1Te1, as shown in Fig. 3e. The intermediate phase could be an interesting phase that reveals piezoelectric properties and requires further studies. The bandgap tuning window by the tellurization of MoS2 from 2.14 to 1.1 eV (see Supplementary Figures 9–11) is nearly twice that of MoS2Se alloys[21] or Mo1−WS2 alloys[22].

Temperature-dependent tellurization behavior

Conversion temperature is another sensitive variable for conversion kinetics. As the tellurization temperature increases, Te content increases gradually and reaches maximum (MoTe2) at 650 °C (Supplementary Figure 12). More interestingly, tellurization occurs more dominantly from the edge (and grain boundaries) at relatively low temperature, while this occurs on the entire surface of MoS2 flakes at high temperature to form MoS2Te alloys, as shown in the schematic of Fig. 4a. Figure 4b illustrates optical images of tellurized monolayer MoS2 flakes at two representative temperatures (550 °C and 625 °C). There are two distinct regions in terms of the optical contrast (bright and dark) in the tellurized MoS2 samples. The corresponding Raman spectra are provided in Fig. 4c. At 550 °C, the bright regions show unaltered 2H-MoS2 peaks, whereas the dark regions reveal semiconducting 2H-MoTe2 peaks. At 625 °C, the bright regions reveal MoS2Te alloy peaks, whereas the dark regions exhibit mixed semiconducting 2H phase and metallic 1T′ phase. This indicates that semiconducting 2H-MoTe2 formed near the edge is favored at low temperature and metallic 1T′-MoTe2 is favored at high temperature, reflecting the bulk phase stability[9]. Photoluminescence (PL) is conducted for further characterization (Fig. 4d). The PL spectrum of the bright regions at 550 °C sample exhibits emission from pristine MoS2 (650 nm), while the bright regions at 625 °C reveal an alloy peak at 1.72 eV (720 nm).
Fig. 4

Temperature-dependent tellurization behavior of MoS2. a Schematic for tellurization behavior of MoS2 converted at low temperature and high temperature. Only the edge site of the MoS2 flakes is favored over converted MoTe2 at a relatively low tellurization temperature, while both the edges and surfaces of the flakes are active for tellurization at a high tellurization temperature. b Optical images of tellurized monolayer MoS2 flakes at 550 °C and 625 °C, respectively. There are two distinct regions in terms of the optical contrast (bright and dark) in the tellurized MoS2 samples; scale bars, 50 μm. c Raman spectra of tellurized MoS2 in bright and dark regions at 550 °C and 625 °C, respectively. d PL spectra of the bright regions also support that negligible Te substitution happened at 550 °C. This indicates that only the edge sites of MoS2 were active for tellurization at 550 °C

Temperature-dependent tellurization behavior of MoS2. a Schematic for tellurization behavior of MoS2 converted at low temperature and high temperature. Only the edge site of the MoS2 flakes is favored over converted MoTe2 at a relatively low tellurization temperature, while both the edges and surfaces of the flakes are active for tellurization at a high tellurization temperature. b Optical images of tellurized monolayer MoS2 flakes at 550 °C and 625 °C, respectively. There are two distinct regions in terms of the optical contrast (bright and dark) in the tellurized MoS2 samples; scale bars, 50 μm. c Raman spectra of tellurized MoS2 in bright and dark regions at 550 °C and 625 °C, respectively. d PL spectra of the bright regions also support that negligible Te substitution happened at 550 °C. This indicates that only the edge sites of MoS2 were active for tellurization at 550 °C We also note that a sharp interface at the edge distinguished by optical contrast is formed at low temperature, while at high temperature, a mixed alloy is preferably formed. At low temperature, tellurization is preferentially initiated at the reactive sites such as the edge and grain boundaries. In that regime, more dominant enthalpic contribution than entropic contribution to Gibbs free energy results in phase segregation to minimize its interfacial energy. Meanwhile, at high temperature, the entropic contribution is dominant and Te atoms have sufficient thermal energy to overcome tellurization energy barrier randomly in the entire MoS2 basal surface. This temperature-dependent behavior is also similar to the previous report on the substitution of Mo atoms in WS2 [23].

Phase modulation with NaOH concentration and temperature

To study the effect of tellurization temperature and NaOH concentration systematically, a series of experiments were done and summarized in Figs. 5a and b. Figure 5a displays the representative Raman spectra of the tellurized MoS2 samples. Four representative types of phases were identified. In the top panel, a 2H-MoS2-like feature is shown with two distinct A1 g and E1 2g peaks of MoS2 and no additional peaks, although the precise positions of such peaks vary slightly with composition. The second panel shows the Raman peaks of the MoS2Te alloy. The third and bottom panels represent 2H-MoTe2 and 2H–1T′-mixed MoTe2 phases, respectively, identified by the E1 2g peaks of 2H-MoTe2 and the Bg peaks for 1T′-MoTe2 (black-dotted line). Note that the 2H semiconducting phase is retained after the full conversion.
Fig. 5

Phase modulation with NaOH concentration and temperature. a Raman spectra of representative MoS2−Te phases with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. b Phase modulation of MoS2−Te identified from Raman spectra and optical images. c, d Confocal Raman mapping images for the intensity (c) and FWHM (d) of fully converted 2H-MoTe2; scale bars, 10 μm. e Electrical transport characteristics of pristine MoS2, MoS2−Te, and 2H-MoTe2. The threshold voltage in the MoSTe2− alloy (red) is shifted positively from pristine MoS2 (green). The p-type behavior is shown for 2H-MoTe2 (blue)

Phase modulation with NaOH concentration and temperature. a Raman spectra of representative MoS2Te phases with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. b Phase modulation of MoS2Te identified from Raman spectra and optical images. c, d Confocal Raman mapping images for the intensity (c) and FWHM (d) of fully converted 2H-MoTe2; scale bars, 10 μm. e Electrical transport characteristics of pristine MoS2, MoS2Te, and 2H-MoTe2. The threshold voltage in the MoSTe2− alloy (red) is shifted positively from pristine MoS2 (green). The p-type behavior is shown for 2H-MoTe2 (blue) Figure 5b shows the phase modulation of MoS2 with temperature and Na content determined by Raman spectra and optical images (Supplementary Figure 13). The tellurization rate increases in proportion to NaOH concentration and tellurization temperature. The conversion ratio is estimated by the area of dark region where MoS2 is fully converted to MoTe2 in optical images (Supplementary Figure 13a), which is expressed in the phase modulation by the gray color scale. In the temperature range from 525 °C to 575 °C, two phases of 2H-MoS2 and 2H-MoTe2 coexist due to the edge-selective tellurization. From 600 °C to 650 °C, both edge and surface are tellurized, resulting in the formation of MoS2Te alloy and fully converted 1T′−2H MoTe2. Figure 5c–d are confocal Raman mapping images of the intensity and full width at half maximum (FWHM) for E1 2g mode from fully converted samples of 2H-MoTe2 (yellow-dotted circle in Fig. 5b). The uniform contrasts of both images indicate reasonable sample uniformity while retaining a monolayer morphology without fragmentation in μm scale. The FWHM value for E1 2g mode is around 6.6 cm−1 (Supplementary Figure 14), indicating that the converted MoTe2 has reasonable crystallinity compared to exfoliated one (5.0 cm−1)[24]. Tellurization was done with good uniformity in mm. The uniformity of MoS2Te alloy and 1T′−2H mixed phase MoTe2 flakes are characterized by Raman mapping and the uniformity dependence on positions are also characterized by Raman spectroscopy (Supplementary Figures 15 and 16). One interesting feature is that the proposed conversion provokes not only an alloying effect but also a carrier-type conversion. Figure 5e shows the transfer characteristics of MoS2, MoS2Te, and 2H-MoTe2. The pristine MoS2 clearly shows an n-type behavior. With the MoS2Te alloy, an n-type behavior is still retained, but the threshold voltage is upshifted significantly, indicating a p-type doping effect. Completely converted MoTe2 clearly demonstrates a p-type behavior; in other words, the carrier type is converted from electron to hole. It is worth mentioning that Na contamination gives n-type doping effect in MoS2 FET (Supplementary Figure S17). In our case, Na compounds are washed out during transfer. Therefore, the p-type doping effect in tellurized MoS2 originates exclusively from Te substitution, not from Na contamination.

Lateral heterojunction and tellurization of WS2

We further provide a few more examples to demonstrate the strength of our efficient Na-assisted tellurization. We generate 2H-MoTe2/2H-MoS2 in-plane heterojunction by telluriding MoS2 at 550 °C (Fig. 6a). The optical micrograph reveals a clear contrast between the edge and inner regions (Fig. 6b). The confocal Raman mapping of the E1 2g peak intensity of MoTe2 was identified at the edge (Fig. 6c), whereas that of E1 2g of MoS2 was identified at the inner region (Fig. 6d). The sharp interface between MoTe2 and MoS2 is attributed to energy minimization by reducing interfacial energy[23], which is confirmed by the PL measurement (Supplementary Figure 18). The diode was fabricated across the interface via electron beam lithography. A clear rectifying behavior is demonstrated due to a type-II junction formation (Fig. 6e) (band diagram shown in inset).
Fig. 6

Formation of MoS2/MoTe2 lateral junction and WS2−Te alloy. a Schematic of 2H-MoS2/2H-MoTe2 in-plane heterojunction. b–e Optical micrograph (b); scale bar, 20 μm, confocal Raman mapping of E1 2g 2H-MoTe2 (c), and 2H-MoS2 (d) for MoTe2/MoS2 junction; scale bars, 50 μm and the corresponding diode I–V curve (e). A clear diode behavior with the band diagram of the MoTe2/MoS2 heterostructure reveals a type-II junction. For electrical measurements, source (MoTe2) and drain (MoS2) electrodes were fabricated by depositing 5/50 nm Cr/Au. f Optical micrograph of tellurized monolayer WS2 flakes. WTe2/WS2−Te junction; scale bar, 20 μm. g Raman spectra from each region of a and b in f. The Raman spectrum of 2H-WS2 is also provided for comparison. h Circularly polarized PL spectra of 2H-WS2 and the WS2−Te alloy (at 300 K) excited by σ+ polarized light at energy of 2.33 eV. The PL is red-shifted to ~ 0.1 eV and valley polarization is enhanced up to 37% in the WS2−Te alloy. Valley polarization (P c) is defined as

Formation of MoS2/MoTe2 lateral junction and WS2−Te alloy. a Schematic of 2H-MoS2/2H-MoTe2 in-plane heterojunction. b–e Optical micrograph (b); scale bar, 20 μm, confocal Raman mapping of E1 2g 2H-MoTe2 (c), and 2H-MoS2 (d) for MoTe2/MoS2 junction; scale bars, 50 μm and the corresponding diode I–V curve (e). A clear diode behavior with the band diagram of the MoTe2/MoS2 heterostructure reveals a type-II junction. For electrical measurements, source (MoTe2) and drain (MoS2) electrodes were fabricated by depositing 5/50 nm Cr/Au. f Optical micrograph of tellurized monolayer WS2 flakes. WTe2/WS2−Te junction; scale bar, 20 μm. g Raman spectra from each region of a and b in f. The Raman spectrum of 2H-WS2 is also provided for comparison. h Circularly polarized PL spectra of 2H-WS2 and the WS2−Te alloy (at 300 K) excited by σ+ polarized light at energy of 2.33 eV. The PL is red-shifted to ~ 0.1 eV and valley polarization is enhanced up to 37% in the WS2−Te alloy. Valley polarization (P c) is defined as Na-assisted tellurization is also possible for tungsten disulfide. The similar optical contrast at different regions was observed in the tellurized WS2 sample (Fig. 6f). Raman spectra for regions (a) and (b) are presented with pristine WS2 for comparison (Fig. 6g). While the inner region (a) reveals an alloy phase of WS2−Te, the outer region (b) clearly shows Raman modes for Td-WTe2 [25]. Due to the semi-metallic nature of Td-WTe2 [26], no PL was observed in the region (b). On the other hand, the alloy phase of WS2−Te shows a PL at 1.93 eV (2.03 eV for pristine WS2) (Fig. 6h). It has been reported that valley polarization can be tuned by doping[27], defect[28], and alloying engineering[8]. Especially, alloying can modify the valley polarization by engineered SOC. Therefore, it is intriguing to observe valley polarization of tellurized WS2 by circularly polarized PL. We define the degree of valley polarization, P c, as follows:where I(σ±) is the intensity of the left (right) circularly polarized PL. No appreciable polarization was observed from pure WS2 at room temperature with a 2.33 eV excitation as seen in another report[29] (top panel). On the other hand, a large valley polarization of ~ 37% is observed in the alloy which can be further enhanced by modifying the resonance radiation[30-32]. The enhancement of valley polarization can be attributed to two reasons: (i) enhanced SOC strength and (ii) inversion symmetry breaking by Te–S species. High SOC strength of Te atom can extend the spin-orbit splitting (∆SO) (∆SO (WTe2): 484 meV, ∆SO (WS2): 412 meV)[33]. We identified Te–S species in WS2−Te alloy by STEM and simulation (Supplementary Figure 19). The Te–S species affect the out-of-plane orbitals and induce Rashba spin splitting. This can be another reason for enhanced valley polarization value[20].

Discussion

In conclusion, we have realized a facile route for tellurization via a Na-scooter. The activation barrier height for conversion of MS2 to MTe2 (M = Mo, W) is dramatically decreased by Na-scooter, resulting in tellurization happening at relatively low temperatures where tellurides are stable. Due to emulating its host material’s nature in the conversion process, we synthesized monolayer 2H-MoTe2 for the first time. Furthermore, the bandgap tuning window has enlarged to 1.0 eV (2.14–1.1 eV). Finally, edge-selective tellurization and modified SOC by Te content can realize two-dimensional heterojunctions and enhance the degree of valley polarization. Our approach will open up new avenues to explore intriguing physics phenomena of tellurides.

Methods

Synthesis of monolayer MoS2 and WS2 by CVD

Monolayer MoS2 and WS2 were grown on SiO2/Si wafers by atmospheric pressure CVD. A water-soluble metal precursor was coated on the SiO2/Si substrate first. The precursor solution was prepared by mixing three types of chemical solutions (defined as A, B, and C). A (Metal precursor): 0.1 g of ammonium heptamolybdate (Sigma-Aldrich, 431346) and 0.2 g of ammonium metatungstate (Sigma-Aldrich, 463922), were dissolved in 10 mL of deionized (DI) water for Mo and W precursors, respectively. B (Promoter): 0.3 g of sodium cholate hydrate dissolved in DI water (Sigma-Aldrich, C6445) was introduced for promoting monolayer TMdCs. C (Medium solution): An OptiPrep density gradient medium (Sigma-Aldrich, D1556, 60% (w v−1) solution of iodixanol in water) was adopted as a medium. It does not affect the growth of TMdCs but allows for a better spin-casting process due to its high viscosity. The precursor solution in which A, B, and C were mixed with the ratios of 2, 6, and 1, respectively, was coated onto the SiO2/Si wafer by spin casting at 3000 r.p.m. for 1 min. The precursor-coated substrate and 0.2 g of sulfur (Sigma, 344621) were separately introduced to a two-zone furnace. The sulfur zone was heated up to 210 °C at a rate of 50 °C min−1. The substrate zone was set to 800 °C. Temperature profiles in both cases (MoS2 and WS2 growth) were the same, but 5 sccm of hydrogen gas was introduced only for the WS2 case with 500 sccm of nitrogen as a carrier gas.

Sodium-assisted conversion process

NaOH of 0.1 g was dissolved in 60 mL of DI water. This NaOH solution of 25–100 μL was dropped on a 1 × 1 cm2 sapphire substrate and dried in an oven (NaOH concentrations were varied from 1.0–4.0 μmol cm2). The NaOH-coated substrate and MoS2 on the SiO2/Si wafer were placed on the ceramic crucible (L 1.5 × W 5 × H 1.5 cm−3). The distance between the MoS2 and NaOH-coated substrate was fixed to 2 mm by placing the NaOH substrate 1 cm above the supporter, in which the MoS2 surface faced the NaOH substrate directly. A 1-inch two-zone CVD was introduced for controlling the temperature of the Te supply zone and tellurization zone, separately. The loading mass of Te is fixed to 1 g and temperature of the Te supply zone is fixed to 600 °C during the whole experiments, giving rise to a Te vapor pressure of ~ 5.91 Torr[34]. The tellurization process was conducted at atmospheric pressure with a flow rate of 500 sccm for N2 gas and 25 sccm for H2 gas. It should be noted that the H2 gas was introduced to suppress oxidation by oxygen leakage and enhance the detachment of sulfur efficiently by the hydrodesulfurization process.

Scanning photoelectron microscopy characterization

The scanning photoelectron microscopy measurement for tellurized MoS2 on SiO2 (300 nm)/Si was performed at the 8A1 beamline of the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory in Korea. The photon source was a U6.8 undulator, and the photon energy was set to 690 eV (photon energy resolution: ~ 100 meV). With the use of the Fresnel zone, the incident X-ray beam size was ~ 200 nm. The X-rays were incident in the vertical direction to the sample surface (0°), and an electron analyzer (PHI 3057, Physical Electronics) was fixed at 54° from the incident light. This geometry allowed for the collection of sensitive information about the sample surface using a shallow probing depth. The defined energy window was 0.75 eV.

TEM and specimen preparation

TEM and ADF-STEM images were taken by a probe aberration-corrected JEM ARM 200 F machine, operated at 80 kV for high-resolution TEM measurements. We set the imaging time within 1 min under a high-magnification STEM node to avoid beam damage on the monolayer TMdC samples. For transferring the samples to the TEM grid, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA C4, MicroChem) was coated onto the tellurized sample on the SiO2/Si wafer, which was then immersed into diluted hydrofluoric acid for detaching monolayer TMdCs from the wafer by etching silicon oxide. The PMMA-supported sample was transferred to the TEM grid (PELCO, 200 mesh, copper, 1.2-μm holes) and then the PMMA was removed by dipping it into acetone for 5 min. The grid was then annealed at 180 °C in a high-vacuum chamber at a pressure of ∼7.5 × 10−5 Torr for 12 h prior to the TEM analysis to avoid polymerization during STEM imaging.

Electronic structures of MoS2Te alloy

Scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/S) was performed to investigate the electronic structure in the tellurized MoS2 sample at room temperature using commercial STM (Omicron, Germany). During the measurement, the pressure in an ultra-high-vacuum chamber was below 5 × 10−11 Torr. For STS measurements, a conventional lock-in technique was applied with a 0.05-V rms voltage modulation at 817 Hz. The sample was thermally cleaned below 300 °C for 1 day.

Simulation methods

The band structure of MoS2Te alloy was calculated by density functional theory with the Quantum Espresso code using a 3 × 3 × 1 supercell. The exchange correlation was estimated by using the generalized gradient approximation under the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof functional. Projector augmented wave potentials were used for all calculations, with 80 Ry used as the cut-off energy. The structures were optimized until the pressure was lower than 0.5 kbar within the force convergence of 0.001 Ry/Bohr. An 8 × 8 × 1 Monkhorst–Pack grid was used for the optimization process and the density of states was calculated with a smearing value of 0.005 Ry. For the Raman calculations of Janus and random phase MoS1Te1, We performed quantum mechanical calculations within DFT framework. Atomic orbital basis sets were used as implemented in DMOL3 code. All electrons, including those from the core part, were considered during calculations. The exchange-correlation functions obtained using a local density approximation and the k-points with Monkhorst–Pack grid with a separation of 0.02/Å were used. The geometry optimization criteria were 0.005 Å for distance, 0.001 Ha/Å for force, and 10−5 Ha for total energy difference. The vibrational frequencies were computed by diagonalization of the mass-weighted second-derivative Cartesian matrix. The Hessian elements were computed by displacing each atom, and then by computing a gradient vector, thus building up a complete second-derivative matrix. In this manner, the vibrational modes were calculated numerically. The Hessian was evaluated using a two-point difference in order to reduce numerical rounding errors. The intensities were obtained from the atomic polar tensor, which was a second derivative of the total energy with respect to the Cartesian coordinates and dipole moments. The intensity of each mode was evaluated as a square of all the transition moments of the mode and expressed in terms of the atomic polar tensor matrix and eigenvectors of the mass-weighted Hessian. The displacement step size was 0.005 Å.

Device fabrication and measurement

The tellurized MoS2 was transferred onto a highly p-doped silicon substrate with a 300-nm-thick oxide. The metal electrodes for the probe contact were patterned on the samples (MoS2, MoTe2, MoSTe2−, and MoS2/MoTe2 junction) by e-beam lithography followed by e-beam deposition of Cr/Au (5/50 nm). All electrical measurements were performed in high vacuum (~ 10−6 Torr) using a Keithley 4200 SCS system.

Circularly polarized PL

Optical measurements were performed with a lab-made laser confocal microscope at room temperature. The laser light was focused with an objective lens (100×, N/A0.85, Nikon) and the lateral resolution was estimated to be ~ 500 nm. Samples were excited with a 532-nm continuous-wave laser polarized with positive helicity (σ+) and negative helicity (σ−). Emitted light was collected with the same objective lens and guided to the spectrometer for spectral analysis. The PL spectra were analyzed for positive (σ+) and negative helicity (σ−) using a combination of a quarter-wave plate and linear polarizer placed before the spectrometer entrance slit.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
  20 in total

1.  Valley polarization in MoS2 monolayers by optical pumping.

Authors:  Hualing Zeng; Junfeng Dai; Wang Yao; Di Xiao; Xiaodong Cui
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Optical generation of excitonic valley coherence in monolayer WSe2.

Authors:  Aaron M Jones; Hongyi Yu; Nirmal J Ghimire; Sanfeng Wu; Grant Aivazian; Jason S Ross; Bo Zhao; Jiaqiang Yan; David G Mandrus; Di Xiao; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Breaking of valley degeneracy by magnetic field in monolayer MoSe2.

Authors:  David MacNeill; Colin Heikes; Kin Fai Mak; Zachary Anderson; Andor Kormányos; Viktor Zólyomi; Jiwoong Park; Daniel C Ralph
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Janus monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides.

Authors:  Ang-Yu Lu; Hanyu Zhu; Jun Xiao; Chih-Piao Chuu; Yimo Han; Ming-Hui Chiu; Chia-Chin Cheng; Chih-Wen Yang; Kung-Hwa Wei; Yiming Yang; Yuan Wang; Dimosthenis Sokaras; Dennis Nordlund; Peidong Yang; David A Muller; Mei-Yin Chou; Xiang Zhang; Lain-Jong Li
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Seeded growth of highly crystalline molybdenum disulphide monolayers at controlled locations.

Authors:  Gang Hee Han; Nicholas J Kybert; Carl H Naylor; Bum Su Lee; Jinglei Ping; Joo Hee Park; Jisoo Kang; Si Young Lee; Young Hee Lee; Ritesh Agarwal; A T Charlie Johnson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Anomalously robust valley polarization and valley coherence in bilayer WS2.

Authors:  Bairen Zhu; Hualing Zeng; Junfeng Dai; Zhirui Gong; Xiaodong Cui
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Doping against the native propensity of MoS2: degenerate hole doping by cation substitution.

Authors:  Joonki Suh; Tae-Eon Park; Der-Yuh Lin; Deyi Fu; Joonsuk Park; Hee Joon Jung; Yabin Chen; Changhyun Ko; Chaun Jang; Yinghui Sun; Robert Sinclair; Joonyeon Chang; Sefaattin Tongay; Junqiao Wu
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 11.189

8.  Large-area synthesis of highly crystalline WSe(2) monolayers and device applications.

Authors:  Jing-Kai Huang; Jiang Pu; Chang-Lung Hsu; Ming-Hui Chiu; Zhen-Yu Juang; Yung-Huang Chang; Wen-Hao Chang; Yoshihiro Iwasa; Taishi Takenobu; Lain-Jong Li
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Band gap engineering and layer-by-layer mapping of selenium-doped molybdenum disulfide.

Authors:  Yongji Gong; Zheng Liu; Andrew R Lupini; Gang Shi; Junhao Lin; Sina Najmaei; Zhong Lin; Ana Laura Elías; Ayse Berkdemir; Ge You; Humberto Terrones; Mauricio Terrones; Robert Vajtai; Sokrates T Pantelides; Stephen J Pennycook; Jun Lou; Wu Zhou; Pulickel M Ajayan
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  Spin-orbit engineering in transition metal dichalcogenide alloy monolayers.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Cedric Robert; Aslihan Suslu; Bin Chen; Sijie Yang; Sarah Alamdari; Iann C Gerber; Thierry Amand; Xavier Marie; Sefaattin Tongay; Bernhard Urbaszek
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Atomic and structural modifications of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides for various advanced applications.

Authors:  Balakrishnan Kirubasankar; Yo Seob Won; Laud Anim Adofo; Soo Ho Choi; Soo Min Kim; Ki Kang Kim
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 9.969

2.  Interlayer coupling and the phase transition mechanism of stacked MoS2/TaS2 heterostructures discovered using temperature dependent Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  Miao Chen; Bin Zhou; Fang Wang; Liping Xu; Kai Jiang; Liyan Shang; Zhigao Hu; Junhao Chu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Optical logic operation via plasmon-exciton interconversion in 2D semiconductors.

Authors:  Jung Ho Kim; Jubok Lee; Hyun Kim; Seok Joon Yun; Jeongyong Kim; Hyun Seok Lee; Young Hee Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Valley phenomena in the candidate phase change material WSe2(1-x)Te2x.

Authors:  Sean M Oliver; Joshua Young; Sergiy Krylyuk; Thomas L Reinecke; Albert V Davydov; Patrick M Vora
Journal:  Commun Phys       Date:  2020

5.  Interfacial transport modulation by intrinsic potential difference of janus TMDs based on CsPbI3/J-TMDs heterojunctions.

Authors:  Haidong Yuan; Jie Su; Siyu Zhang; Jiayu Di; Zhenhua Lin; Jincheng Zhang; Jie Zhang; Jingjing Chang; Yue Hao
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-04

6.  Growth of bilayer MoTe2 single crystals with strong non-linear Hall effect.

Authors:  Teng Ma; Hao Chen; Kunihiro Yananose; Xin Zhou; Lin Wang; Runlai Li; Ziyu Zhu; Zhenyue Wu; Qing-Hua Xu; Jaejun Yu; Cheng Wei Qiu; Alessandro Stroppa; Kian Ping Loh
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Atomic transistors based on seamless lateral metal-semiconductor junctions with a sub-1-nm transfer length.

Authors:  Seunguk Song; Aram Yoon; Jong-Kwon Ha; Jihoon Yang; Sora Jang; Chloe Leblanc; Jaewon Wang; Yeoseon Sim; Deep Jariwala; Seung Kyu Min; Zonghoon Lee; Soon-Yong Kwon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Designing artificial two-dimensional landscapes via atomic-layer substitution.

Authors:  Yunfan Guo; Yuxuan Lin; Kaichen Xie; Biao Yuan; Jiadi Zhu; Pin-Chun Shen; Ang-Yu Lu; Cong Su; Enzheng Shi; Kunyan Zhang; Changan HuangFu; Haowei Xu; Zhengyang Cai; Ji-Hoon Park; Qingqing Ji; Jiangtao Wang; Xiaochuan Dai; Xuezeng Tian; Shengxi Huang; Letian Dou; Liying Jiao; Ju Li; Yi Yu; Juan-Carlos Idrobo; Ting Cao; Tomás Palacios; Jing Kong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Tailoring Quantum Tunneling in a Vanadium-Doped WSe2/SnSe2 Heterostructure.

Authors:  Sidi Fan; Seok Joon Yun; Woo Jong Yu; Young Hee Lee
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 16.806

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.