| Literature DB >> 29255050 |
Christine L Nittrouer1, Michelle R Hebl2, Leslie Ashburn-Nardo3, Rachel C E Trump-Steele2, David M Lane2,4, Virginia Valian5.
Abstract
Colloquium talks at prestigious universities both create and reflect academic researchers' reputations. Gender disparities in colloquium talks can arise through a variety of mechanisms. The current study examines gender differences in colloquium speakers at 50 prestigious US colleges and universities in 2013-2014. Using archival data, we analyzed 3,652 talks in six academic disciplines. Men were more likely than women to be colloquium speakers even after controlling for the gender and rank of the available speakers. Eliminating alternative explanations (e.g., women declining invitations more often than men), our follow-up data revealed that female and male faculty at top universities reported no differences in the extent to which they (i) valued and (ii) turned down speaking engagements. Additional data revealed that the presence of women as colloquium chairs (and potentially on colloquium committees) increased the likelihood of women appearing as colloquium speakers. Our data suggest that those who invite and schedule speakers serve as gender gatekeepers with the power to create or reduce gender differences in academic reputations.Entities:
Keywords: academia; colloquia; gatekeepers; gender bias; professional recognition
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29255050 PMCID: PMC5776791 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708414115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205