Literature DB >> 29253731

An analysis of cumulative risks based on biomonitoring data for six phthalates using the Maximum Cumulative Ratio.

Jeanette M Reyes1, Paul S Price2.   

Abstract

The Maximum Cumulative Ratio (MCR) quantifies the degree to which a single chemical drives the cumulative risk of an individual exposed to multiple chemicals. Phthalates are a class of chemicals with ubiquitous exposures in the general population that have the potential to cause adverse health effects in humans. This work used the MCR to evaluate coexposures to six phthalates as measured in biomonitoring data from the most recent cycle (2013-2014) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The values of MCR, Hazard Index (HI), and phthalate-specific Hazard Quotients (HQs) were determined for 2663 NHANES participants aged six years and older by using reverse dosimetry techniques to calculate steady-state doses consistent with concentrations of metabolites of six phthalates in urine and using Tolerable Daily Intake values. There were 21 participants (0.8% of the NHANES sample) with HI>1. Of those, 43% (9/21) would have been missed by chemical-by-chemical assessments (i.e. all HQs were less than one). The mean MCR value in the 21 participants was 2.1. HI and MCR values were negatively correlated (p<0.001) indicating that most participants, especially those with elevated HI values, had their cumulative risks driven by relatively large doses of a single phthalate rather than doses of multiple phthalates. The dominate phthalate varied across participants. Children (aged 6-17years) had a higher HI values (p<0.01) than adults (18+ years). However, the probability of having HI>1 was not driven by age, gender, or ethnicity. The cumulative exposures of concern largely originated from a subset of three of the fifteen possible pairs of the six phthalates. These findings suggest that cumulative exposures were a potential concern for a small portion of the surveyed participants involving a subset of the phthalates explored. The largest risks tended to occur in individuals whose exposures were dominated by a single phthalate. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomonitoring; Cumulative exposures; Maximum cumulative ratio; Mixtures; NHANES; Phthalates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29253731      PMCID: PMC6146946          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  37 in total

1.  Applying the maximum cumulative ratio methodology to biomonitoring data on dioxin-like compounds in the general public and two occupationally exposed populations.

Authors:  Xianglu Han; Paul S Price
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 2.  Exposure assessment issues in epidemiology studies of phthalates.

Authors:  Lauren E Johns; Glinda S Cooper; Audrey Galizia; John D Meeker
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 3.  Phthalates and children's health.

Authors:  Sheela Sathyanarayana
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care       Date:  2008-02

4.  Application of the maximum cumulative ratio (MCR) as a screening tool for the evaluation of mixtures in residential indoor air.

Authors:  Katleen De Brouwere; Christa Cornelis; Athanasios Arvanitis; Terry Brown; Derrick Crump; Paul Harrison; Matti Jantunen; Paul Price; Rudi Torfs
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Urinary excretion of phthalate metabolites in school children of China: implication for cumulative risk assessment of phthalate exposure.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Hexing Wang; Wei Zhou; Yue Chen; Ying Zhou; Qingwu Jiang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Reproductive toxicity of phthalate esters.

Authors:  Anderson Joel Martino-Andrade; Ibrahim Chahoud
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 7.  Human body burdens of chemicals used in plastic manufacture.

Authors:  Holger M Koch; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Determining the maximum cumulative ratios for mixtures observed in ground water wells used as drinking water supplies in the United States.

Authors:  Xianglu Han; Paul S Price
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Assessment of chemical coexposure patterns based upon phthalate biomonitoring data within the 2007/2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Hua Qian; Min Chen; Kevin M Kransler; Rosemary T Zaleski
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  Variation in urinary spot sample, 24 h samples, and longer-term average urinary concentrations of short-lived environmental chemicals: implications for exposure assessment and reverse dosimetry.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Sean M Hays; Angelika Zidek
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.563

View more
  6 in total

1.  A proposal for creating a taxonomy of chemical interactions using concepts from the aggregate exposure and adverse outcome pathways.

Authors:  Paul Price; Jeremy Leonard
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2019-08-01

2.  Impact of Hurricane Maria on Drinking Water Quality in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Yishan Lin; Maria Sevillano-Rivera; Tao Jiang; Guangyu Li; Irmarie Cotto; Solize Vosloo; Corey M G Carpenter; Philip Larese-Casanova; Roger W Giese; Damian E Helbling; Ingrid Y Padilla; Zaira Rosario-Pabón; Carmen Vélez Vega; José F Cordero; Akram N Alshawabkeh; Ameet Pinto; April Z Gu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Determinants of phthalate exposures in pregnant women in New York City.

Authors:  Hongxiu Liu; Yuyan Wang; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Mengling Liu; Hongkai Zhu; Yu Chen; Linda G Kahn; Melanie H Jacobson; Bo Gu; Shilpi Mehta-Lee; Sara G Brubaker; Akhgar Ghassabian; Leonardo Trasande
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.431

4.  Temporal Trends in Exposures to Six Phthalates from Biomonitoring Data: Implications for Cumulative Risk.

Authors:  Jeanette M Reyes; Paul S Price
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 11.357

5.  Biomonitoring and Subsequent Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Phthalates in Iranian Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Maryam Zare Jeddi; Mohamad Eshaghi Gorji; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Jochem Louisse; Yuri Bruinen de Bruin; Roman Liska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Interindividual Variation in Source-Specific Doses is a Determinant of Health Impacts of Combined Chemical Exposures.

Authors:  Paul Price
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.