Literature DB >> 22781437

Applying the maximum cumulative ratio methodology to biomonitoring data on dioxin-like compounds in the general public and two occupationally exposed populations.

Xianglu Han1, Paul S Price.   

Abstract

Maximum cumulative ratio (MCR) is a person's cumulative exposure to multiple chemicals divided by the maximum chemical-specific exposure where exposure is expressed on a toxicologically equivalent basis. It is a tool for assessing the need for performing cumulative exposure assessments. In this paper, MCR values were calculated for the three groups of individuals with biomonitoring data of 26 dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) based on the World Health Organization toxic equivalent factors (TEFs). Although the two occupational groups have higher total toxicity equivalence (TEQ) levels than the NHANES group, average MCR values of the three groups are similar (3.5, 3.6, and 3.2). These MCR values are higher than those seen in our earlier studies, supporting the practice of performing cumulative assessments for DLCs. The MCR values also indicate that only 2-5 of the 26 chemicals make significant contributions to total TEQ values. Interestingly, MCR is negatively correlated with total TEQ (in all the three groups) and age (in the NHANES group). Additionally, MCR is lower in workers where occupational exposures are larger than background exposures. Although overall exposure is the first factor to consider in any mixtures assessment, this paper confirms the usefulness of MCR as a tool for analyzing the pattern of chemical-specific contributions to the total exposure levels of mixtures based on biomonitoring data when TEFs or similar approaches are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22781437     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  7 in total

1.  An analysis of cumulative risks based on biomonitoring data for six phthalates using the Maximum Cumulative Ratio.

Authors:  Jeanette M Reyes; Paul S Price
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 2.  Advancing research on endocrine disrupting chemicals in breast cancer: Expert panel recommendations.

Authors:  Susan L Teitelbaum; Fiorella Belpoggi; Les Reinlib
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  Chemical Mixtures in the EU Population: Composition and Potential Risks.

Authors:  Sebastian Socianu; Stephanie K Bopp; Eva Govarts; Liese Gilles; Jurgen Buekers; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Thomas Backhaus; Antonio Franco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Temporal Trends in Exposures to Six Phthalates from Biomonitoring Data: Implications for Cumulative Risk.

Authors:  Jeanette M Reyes; Paul S Price
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 5.  Environmental Chemical Assessment in Clinical Practice: Unveiling the Elephant in the Room.

Authors:  Nicole Bijlsma; Marc M Cohen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Biomonitoring and Subsequent Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Phthalates in Iranian Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Maryam Zare Jeddi; Mohamad Eshaghi Gorji; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Jochem Louisse; Yuri Bruinen de Bruin; Roman Liska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Interindividual Variation in Source-Specific Doses is a Determinant of Health Impacts of Combined Chemical Exposures.

Authors:  Paul Price
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.000

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.