Literature DB >> 24565859

Application of the maximum cumulative ratio (MCR) as a screening tool for the evaluation of mixtures in residential indoor air.

Katleen De Brouwere1, Christa Cornelis2, Athanasios Arvanitis3, Terry Brown4, Derrick Crump4, Paul Harrison4, Matti Jantunen5, Paul Price6, Rudi Torfs2.   

Abstract

The maximum cumulative ratio (MCR) method allows the categorisation of mixtures according to whether the mixture is of concern for toxicity and if so whether this is driven by one substance or multiple substances. The aim of the present study was to explore, by application of the MCR approach, whether health risks due to indoor air pollution are dominated by one substance or are due to concurrent exposure to various substances. Analysis was undertaken on monitoring data of four European indoor studies (giving five datasets), involving 1800 records of indoor air or personal exposure. Application of the MCR methodology requires knowledge of the concentrations of chemicals in a mixture together with health-based reference values for those chemicals. For this evaluation, single substance health-based reference values (RVs) were selected through a structured review process. The MCR analysis found high variability in the proportion of samples of concern for mixture toxicity. The fraction of samples in these groups of concern varied from 2% (Flemish schools) to 77% (EXPOLIS, Basel, indoor), the variation being due not only to the variation in indoor air contaminant levels across the studies but also to other factors such as differences in number and type of substances monitored, analytical performance, and choice of RVs. However, in 4 out of the 5 datasets, a considerable proportion of cases were found where a chemical-by-chemical approach failed to identify the need for the investigation of combined risk assessment. Although the MCR methodology applied in the current study provides no consideration of commonality of endpoints, it provides a tool for discrimination between those mixtures requiring further combined risk assessment and those for which a single-substance assessment is sufficient.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combined risk assessment; EXPOLIS; Multiple substances; Non-cancer endpoints; OQAI; Screening tool

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24565859     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating the risk of mixtures in the indoor air of primary school classrooms.

Authors:  Nitika Mishra; Godwin A Ayoko; Tunga Salthammer; Lidia Morawska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Impact of Hurricane Maria on Drinking Water Quality in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Yishan Lin; Maria Sevillano-Rivera; Tao Jiang; Guangyu Li; Irmarie Cotto; Solize Vosloo; Corey M G Carpenter; Philip Larese-Casanova; Roger W Giese; Damian E Helbling; Ingrid Y Padilla; Zaira Rosario-Pabón; Carmen Vélez Vega; José F Cordero; Akram N Alshawabkeh; Ameet Pinto; April Z Gu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  An analysis of cumulative risks based on biomonitoring data for six phthalates using the Maximum Cumulative Ratio.

Authors:  Jeanette M Reyes; Paul S Price
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Chemical Mixtures in the EU Population: Composition and Potential Risks.

Authors:  Sebastian Socianu; Stephanie K Bopp; Eva Govarts; Liese Gilles; Jurgen Buekers; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Thomas Backhaus; Antonio Franco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Temporal Trends in Exposures to Six Phthalates from Biomonitoring Data: Implications for Cumulative Risk.

Authors:  Jeanette M Reyes; Paul S Price
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 11.357

6.  Guidance Document on Scientific criteria for grouping chemicals into assessment groups for human risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals.

Authors:  Simon John More; Vasileios Bampidis; Diane Benford; Claude Bragard; Antonio Hernandez-Jerez; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Thorhallur Ingi Halldorsson; Konstantinos Panagiotis Koutsoumanis; Claude Lambré; Kyriaki Machera; Hanspeter Naegeli; Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Josef Rudolf Schlatter; Dieter Schrenk; Vittorio Silano; Dominique Turck; Maged Younes; Emilio Benfenati; Amélie Crépet; Jan Dirk Te Biesebeek; Emanuela Testai; Bruno Dujardin; Jean Lou Cm Dorne; Christer Hogstrand
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 7.  Exposure modelling in Europe: how to pave the road for the future as part of the European Exposure Science Strategy 2020-2030.

Authors:  Urs Schlüter; Jessica Meyer; Andreas Ahrens; Francesca Borghi; Frédéric Clerc; Christiaan Delmaar; Antonio Di Guardo; Tatsiana Dudzina; Peter Fantke; Wouter Fransman; Stefan Hahn; Henri Heussen; Christian Jung; Joonas Koivisto; Dorothea Koppisch; Alicia Paini; Nenad Savic; Andrea Spinazzè; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Natalie von Goetz
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 6.371

8.  Biomonitoring and Subsequent Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Phthalates in Iranian Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Maryam Zare Jeddi; Mohamad Eshaghi Gorji; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Jochem Louisse; Yuri Bruinen de Bruin; Roman Liska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Interindividual Variation in Source-Specific Doses is a Determinant of Health Impacts of Combined Chemical Exposures.

Authors:  Paul Price
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.000

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.