Literature DB >> 30272963

Temporal Trends in Exposures to Six Phthalates from Biomonitoring Data: Implications for Cumulative Risk.

Jeanette M Reyes1, Paul S Price2.   

Abstract

Phthalates are used in a wide range of consumer goods, resulting in exposures to specific phthalates that vary over time in accordance with changes in product use and how phthalates are utilized. We investigated trends in estimates of daily intake dose and several cumulative risk metrics, including the Hazard Quotient (HQ), Hazard Index (HI), and Maximum Cumulative Ratio (MCR) for six phthalates from 2005 to 2014 using metabolite biomonitoring data collected from spot urine samples under the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Over this period, there was a 2.2-fold decrease in the mean HI (0.34 to 0.15) and a 7.2-fold decrease in the percentage of participants with an HI > 1 (5.7% to 0.8%), indicating an overall decrease in combined exposure to these phthalates. Children (aged 6-11 years) had higher mean HI values than either adolescents (aged 12-19 years) or adults (aged 20+ years) during this period. MCR values were generally low and inversely correlated with HI. This indicated that a single phthalate usually drove the hazards for highly exposed individuals. However, the average value of MCR increased 1.2-fold (1.7-2.1) over this period indicating an increasing need to consider exposures to multiple phthalates in this group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30272963      PMCID: PMC8862759          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   11.357


  44 in total

1.  Applying the maximum cumulative ratio methodology to biomonitoring data on dioxin-like compounds in the general public and two occupationally exposed populations.

Authors:  Xianglu Han; Paul S Price
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Combined exposures to anti-androgenic chemicals: steps towards cumulative risk assessment.

Authors:  A Kortenkamp; M Faust
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2010-04

3.  Current and future risk assessment guidelines, policy, and methods development for chemical mixtures.

Authors:  L K Teuschler; R C Hertzberg
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1995-12-28       Impact factor: 4.221

4.  Prohibition of Children’s Toys and Child Care Articles Containing Specified Phthalates. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2017-10-27

Review 5.  Reproductive toxicity of phthalate esters.

Authors:  Anderson Joel Martino-Andrade; Ibrahim Chahoud
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.914

6.  Occupational exposure assessment of phthalate esters in indoor and outdoor microenvironments.

Authors:  Meng Xia; Xingzi Ouyang; Xueqing Wang; Xueyou Shen; Yu Zhan
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.565

7.  Relationship between urinary phthalate and bisphenol A concentrations and serum thyroid measures in U.S. adults and adolescents from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2008.

Authors:  John D Meeker; Kelly K Ferguson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Exposure to phthalate esters.

Authors:  R M David
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Human exposure estimates for phthalates.

Authors:  M C Kohn; F Parham; S A Masten; C J Portier; M D Shelby; J W Brock; L L Needham
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Assessment of chemical coexposure patterns based upon phthalate biomonitoring data within the 2007/2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Hua Qian; Min Chen; Kevin M Kransler; Rosemary T Zaleski
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.563

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bayesian inference of chemical exposures from NHANES urine biomonitoring data.

Authors:  Zachary Stanfield; R Woodrow Setzer; Victoria Hull; Risa R Sayre; Kristin K Isaacs; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.371

2.  Determinants of phthalate exposures in pregnant women in New York City.

Authors:  Hongxiu Liu; Yuyan Wang; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Mengling Liu; Hongkai Zhu; Yu Chen; Linda G Kahn; Melanie H Jacobson; Bo Gu; Shilpi Mehta-Lee; Sara G Brubaker; Akhgar Ghassabian; Leonardo Trasande
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.431

3.  Exposure to di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate in the U.S. general population from the 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Manori J Silva; Lee-Yang Wong; Ella Samandar; James L Preau; Lily T Jia; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 13.352

4.  Pregnancy intention and phthalate metabolites among pregnant women in The Infant Development and Environment Study cohort.

Authors:  Grace R Lyden; Emily S Barrett; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Nicole R Bush; Shanna H Swan; Ruby H N Nguyen
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.103

5.  Interindividual Variation in Source-Specific Doses is a Determinant of Health Impacts of Combined Chemical Exposures.

Authors:  Paul Price
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.