Reinskje Talhout1, Patricia A Richter2, Irina Stepanov3, Christina V Watson2, Clifford H Watson2. 1. Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. 2. Tobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA. 3. Division of Environmental Health Sciences and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the effects of non-tobacco, physical cigarette design features on smoke emissions, product appeal, and smoking behaviors - 3 factors that determine smoker's exposure and related health risks. METHODS: We reviewed available evidence for the impact of filter ventilation, new filter types, and cigarettes dimensions on toxic emissions, smoker's perceptions, and behavior. For evidence sources we used scientific literature and websites providing product characteristics and marketing information. RESULTS: Whereas filter ventilation results in lower machine-generated emissions, it also leads to perceptions of lighter taste and relative safety in smokers who can unwittingly employ more intense smoking behavior to obtain the desired amount of nicotine and sensory appeal. Filter additives that modify smoke emissions can also modify sensory cues, resulting in changes in smoking behavior. Flavor capsules increase the cigarette's appeal and novelty, and lead to misperceptions of reduced harm. Slim cigarettes have lower yields of some smoke emissions, but smoking behavior can be more intense than with standard cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: Physical design features significantly impact machine-measured emission yields in cigarette smoke, product appeal, smoking behaviors, and exposures in smokers. The influence of current and emerging design features is important in understanding the effectiveness of regulatory actions to reduce smoking-related harm.
OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the effects of non-tobacco, physical cigarette design features on smoke emissions, product appeal, and smoking behaviors - 3 factors that determine smoker's exposure and related health risks. METHODS: We reviewed available evidence for the impact of filter ventilation, new filter types, and cigarettes dimensions on toxic emissions, smoker's perceptions, and behavior. For evidence sources we used scientific literature and websites providing product characteristics and marketing information. RESULTS: Whereas filter ventilation results in lower machine-generated emissions, it also leads to perceptions of lighter taste and relative safety in smokers who can unwittingly employ more intense smoking behavior to obtain the desired amount of nicotine and sensory appeal. Filter additives that modify smoke emissions can also modify sensory cues, resulting in changes in smoking behavior. Flavor capsules increase the cigarette's appeal and novelty, and lead to misperceptions of reduced harm. Slim cigarettes have lower yields of some smoke emissions, but smoking behavior can be more intense than with standard cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: Physical design features significantly impact machine-measured emission yields in cigarette smoke, product appeal, smoking behaviors, and exposures in smokers. The influence of current and emerging design features is important in understanding the effectiveness of regulatory actions to reduce smoking-related harm.
Entities:
Keywords:
cigarette design; cigarette emissions; cigarette user perception and behavior; filter type; filter ventilation; smoking
Authors: Vaughan W Rees; Jennifer M Kreslake; Geoffrey Ferris Wayne; Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Gregory N Connolly Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-02-25 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Seema Mutti; David Hammond; Ron Borland; Michael K Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Addiction Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: David J Dittrich; Richard T Fieblekorn; Michael J Bevan; David Rushforth; James J Murphy; Madeleine Ashley; Kevin G McAdam; Chuan Liu; Christopher J Proctor Journal: Springerplus Date: 2014-07-22
Authors: Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez; Farahnaz Islam; Yoo Jin Cho; Ramzi George Salloum; Jordan Louviere; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Joaquin Barnoya; Belen Saenz de Miera Juarez; James Hardin; James F Thrasher Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Bill King; Ron Borland; Michael Le Grande; Richard O'Connor; Geoffrey Fong; Ann McNeill; Dorothy Hatsukami; Michael Cummings Journal: Tob Control Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Charlotte G G M Pauwels; Agnes W Boots; Wouter F Visser; Jeroen L A Pennings; Reinskje Talhout; Frederik-Jan Van Schooten; Antoon Opperhuizen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jeroen L A Pennings; Johannes W J M Cremers; Mark J A Becker; Walther N M Klerx; Reinskje Talhout Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 4.244