Liane M Schneller1, Maansi Bansal-Travers2, Martin C Mahoney3, Susan E McCann4, Richard J O'Connor2. 1. Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. 2. Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY. 3. Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY. 4. Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Characterize physical design features of cigarette brands sold in the US according to the delivery method of menthol that may affect sensory perception among users. METHODS: Twelve cigarette brands, mentholated and non-mentholated, were purchased for analyses of the physical design characteristics, quantification of nicotine and menthol, and identification of flavor additives. RESULTS: Physical design characteristics did not differ significantly between the various cigarette brands. However, significant differences were seen in levels of menthol. Menthol levels were greatest in products that had dual delivery methods of menthol (6.7mg/cigarette; SE=0.27) followed by products mentholated in a filter capsule only (5.7mg/cigarette; SE=0.25), and those mentholated in the tobacco only (3.8mg/cigarette; SE=0.12); products that were not mentholated had the least (0.38mg/cigarette; SE=0.31). Finally, flavor additives with a mint flavor profile other than menthol were identified, such as pulegone and limonene, and differed between cigarette brands, which are likely contributing to the menthol flavor experience associated with use of these products. CONCLUSIONS: The regulation of menthol delivery method, flavorings added to the capsule, and/or menthol concentration may be beneficial for the public health as these factors are likely creating unique sensory experiences.
OBJECTIVES: Characterize physical design features of cigarette brands sold in the US according to the delivery method of menthol that may affect sensory perception among users. METHODS: Twelve cigarette brands, mentholated and non-mentholated, were purchased for analyses of the physical design characteristics, quantification of nicotine and menthol, and identification of flavor additives. RESULTS: Physical design characteristics did not differ significantly between the various cigarette brands. However, significant differences were seen in levels of menthol. Menthol levels were greatest in products that had dual delivery methods of menthol (6.7mg/cigarette; SE=0.27) followed by products mentholated in a filter capsule only (5.7mg/cigarette; SE=0.25), and those mentholated in the tobacco only (3.8mg/cigarette; SE=0.12); products that were not mentholated had the least (0.38mg/cigarette; SE=0.31). Finally, flavor additives with a mint flavor profile other than menthol were identified, such as pulegone and limonene, and differed between cigarette brands, which are likely contributing to the menthol flavor experience associated with use of these products. CONCLUSIONS: The regulation of menthol delivery method, flavorings added to the capsule, and/or menthol concentration may be beneficial for the public health as these factors are likely creating unique sensory experiences.
Authors: James F Thrasher; Erika N Abad-Vivero; Crawford Moodie; Richard J O'Connor; David Hammond; K Michael Cummings; Hua-Hie Yong; Ramzi G Salloum; Christine Czoli; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu Journal: Tob Control Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Sunghwan Kim; Jie Chen; Tiejun Cheng; Asta Gindulyte; Jia He; Siqian He; Qingliang Li; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Paul A Thiessen; Bo Yu; Leonid Zaslavsky; Jian Zhang; Evan E Bolton Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Catherine C Osborn; Jessica P Suratkal; Stephanie N Pike Moore; Sarah Koopman Gonzalez; Kymberle L Sterling; Amanda J Quisenberry; Elizabeth G Klein; Erika S Trapl Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 4.614