Literature DB >> 11893815

Cigarettes with defective filters marketed for 40 years: what Philip Morris never told smokers.

J L Pauly1, A B Mepani, J D Lesses, K M Cummings, R J Streck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than 90% of the cigarettes sold worldwide have a filter. Nearly all filters consist of a rod of numerous ( > 12 000) plastic-like cellulose acetate fibres. During high speed cigarette manufacturing procedures, fragments of cellulose acetate that form the mouthpiece of a filter rod become separated from the filter at the end face. The cut surface of the filter of nearly all cigarettes has these fragments. In smoking a cigarette in the usual manner, some of these fragments are released during puffing. In addition to the cellulose acetate fragments, carbon particles are released also from some cigarette brands that have a charcoal filter. Cigarettes with filters that release cellulose acetate or carbon particles during normal smoking conditions are defective.
OBJECTIVE: Specific goals were to review systematically the writings of tobacco companies to: (a) identify papers that would document the existence of defective filters; (b) characterise the extent of the defect; (c) establish when the defect became known; (d) determine whether the defect exists on cigarettes marketed currently; (e) assess the prevalence of the defect on cigarettes manufactured by different companies; (f) define whether the knowledge of the defect had been withheld by the tobacco company as confidential and not disclosed publicly; and (g) ascertain the feasibility of correcting or preventing the defect.
METHODS: Document searches utilised databases of the scientific literature, medical journals, chemical abstracts, US Patents, Tobacco Abstracts, papers presented at tobacco meetings and court documents.
RESULTS: Sixty one documents of Philip Morris, Inc were selected for study because they disclosed specifically the "fall-out" of cellulose acetate filter fibres and, for cigarettes with charcoal filters, carbon particles from cigarette filters. The term "fall-out" was defined in 1985 laboratory protocols of Philip Morris, Inc. as "loose fibers (or particles) that are drawn out of the filter during puffing of the cigarette". As early as 1957, the health concern of inhaling cellulose acetate fibres released from cigarette filters was addressed by Philip Morris, Inc. A 1962 document reported the results of laboratory tests conducted by Phillip Morris, Inc that compared the "fall-out" of cellulose acetate fibres from the filters of their cigarettes (Marlboro) and cigarettes of their competitor (Liggett & Meyers). A 1997 overview by Phillip Morris of documents addressing the "fallout of carbon particles and cellulose acetate fibers from filters" stated that they were "essentially routine reports" of cigarette filter assays, and referenced a "Filter Fallout" memo written in 1961-more than 40 years ago. Most likely these tests are being conducted presently as illustrated by a 1999 report that details the revisions of the "fall-out" protocol of Phillip Morris, Inc and reports the results of tests that measured the discharge of cellulose acetate fibres and silica gel from beta cigarettes with a new type of filter. Our analysis of the "fall-out" tests results presented in the 61 "fall-out" documents showed that filter fibres and carbon particles were discharged from the filters of all types of cigarettes tested. These cigarette types (n = 130) included both coded cigarettes and popular brand name cigarettes. No publications were found in the scientific literature of the "fall-out" studies. Thus, the results of the "fall-out" studies are thought to have been withheld as confidential to Philip Morris, Inc. We have identified also other companies that have tested recently cigarettes for defective filters. In addition, our searches have shown that simple, expedient, and inexpensive technologies for decontaminating cigarette filters of loose cellulose acetate fibres and particles from the cut surface of the filter have been developed and described in 1997 and 1998 US patents. What is more important is that these patents also define methods for preventing or reducing the broken plastic-like fibres that arise during cigarette making. Many US patents (n = 607; 1957 to 2001) have been awarded for cigarette filters. Some of these inventions describe novel materials and unique filtration schemes that would eliminate or minimise the discharge of filter materials into mainstream smoke.
CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that: (a) the filter of today's cigarette is defective; (b) Philip Morris, Inc has known of this filter defect for more than 40 years; (c) the existence of this filter defect has been confirmed by others in independent studies; (d) many methods exist to prevent and correct the filter defect, but have not been implemented; and (e) results of investigations substantiating defective filters have been concealed from the smoker and the health community. The tobacco industry has been negligent in not performing toxicological examinations and other studies to assess the human health risks associated with regularly ingesting and inhaling non-degradable, toxin coated cellulose acetate fragments and carbon microparticles and possibly other components that are released from conventional cigarette filters during normal smoking. The rationale for harm assessment is supported by the results of consumer surveys that have shown that the ingestion or inhalation of cigarette filter fibres are a health concern to nearly all smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11893815      PMCID: PMC1766058          DOI: 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  11 in total

Review 1.  The less harmful cigarette: a controversial issue. a tribute to Ernst L. Wynder.

Authors:  D Hoffmann; I Hoffmann; K El-Bayoumy
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 2.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Consumers' knowledge and beliefs about the safety of cigarette filters.

Authors:  J L Hastrup; K M Cummings; T Swedrock; A Hyland; J L Pauly
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Release of carbon granules from cigarettes with charcoal filters.

Authors:  J L Pauly; S J Stegmeier; A G Mayer; J D Lesses; R J Streck
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Fibers released from cigarette filters: an additional health risk to the smoker?

Authors:  J L Pauly; H A Allaart; M I Rodriguez; R J Streck
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Failed promises of the cigarette industry and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking.

Authors:  K M Cummings; C P Morley; A Hyland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Glass fiber contamination of cigarette filters: an additional health risk to the smoker?

Authors:  J L Pauly; H J Lee; E L Hurley; K M Cummings; J D Lesses; R J Streck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Crocidolite asbestos fibers in smoke from original Kent cigarettes.

Authors:  W E Longo; M W Rigler; J Slade
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Inhaled cellulosic and plastic fibers found in human lung tissue.

Authors:  J L Pauly; S J Stegmeier; H A Allaart; R T Cheney; P J Zhang; A G Mayer; R J Streck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective.

Authors:  K Michael Cummings; Anthony Brown; Clifford E Douglas
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Tobacco industry consumer research on socially acceptable cigarettes.

Authors:  P M Ling; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Recommendations for the Appropriate Structure, Communication, and Investigation of Tobacco Harm Reduction Claims. An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

Authors:  Frank T Leone; Kai-Håkon Carlsen; David Chooljian; Laura E Crotty Alexander; Frank C Detterbeck; Michelle N Eakin; Sarah Evers-Casey; Harold J Farber; Patricia Folan; Hasmeena Kathuria; Karen Latzka; Shane McDermott; Sharon McGrath-Morrow; Farzad Moazed; Alfred Munzer; Enid Neptune; Smita Pakhale; David P L Sachs; Jonathan Samet; Beth Sufian; Dona Upson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  Surveillance methods for identifying, characterizing, and monitoring tobacco products: potential reduced exposure products as an example.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly; Kaila J Norton; David Sweanor; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Cigarette filter-based assays as proxies for toxicant exposure and smoking behavior--a literature review.

Authors:  John L Pauly; Richard J O'Connor; Geraldine M Paszkiewicz; K Michael Cummings; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Cigarette Design Features: Effects on Emission Levels, User Perception, and Behavior.

Authors:  Reinskje Talhout; Patricia A Richter; Irina Stepanov; Christina V Watson; Clifford H Watson
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-01

7.  Toxicity of cigarette butts, and their chemical components, to marine and freshwater fish.

Authors:  Elli Slaughter; Richard M Gersberg; Kayo Watanabe; John Rudolph; Chris Stransky; Thomas E Novotny
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Whose butt is it? tobacco industry research about smokers and cigarette butt waste.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Thomas E Novotny
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  The intractable cigarette 'filter problem'.

Authors:  Bradford Harris
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Human pathogens abundant in the bacterial metagenome of cigarettes.

Authors:  Amy R Sapkota; Sibel Berger; Timothy M Vogel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.