Literature DB >> 29947729

Pictorial Warning Labels and Memory for Cigarette Health-risk Information Over Time.

Ellen Peters1, Brittany Shoots-Reinhard1, Abigail T Evans1,2, Abigail Shoben2, Elizabeth Klein2, Mary Kate Tompkins1, Daniel Romer3, Martin Tusler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pictorial cigarette warning labels are thought to increase risk knowledge, but experimental research has not examined longer-term effects on memory for health risks named in text.
PURPOSE: To investigate memory-consolidation predictions that high- versus low-emotion warnings would support better long-term memory for named cigarette health risks and to test a mediational model of warning-label effects through memory on risk perceptions and quit intentions.
METHODS: A combined sample of U.S.-representative adult smokers, U.S.-representative teen smokers/vulnerable smokers, and Appalachian-representative adult smokers were randomly assigned to a warning-label condition (High-emotion pictorial, Low-emotion pictorial, Text-only) in which they were exposed four times to nine warning labels and reported emotional reactions and elaboration. Memory of warning-label risk information, smoking risk perceptions, and quit intentions were assessed immediately after exposures or 6 weeks later.
RESULTS: Recall of warning-label text was low across the samples and supported memory-consolidation predictions. Specifically, immediate recall was highest for Low-emotion warnings that elicited the least emotion, but recall also declined the most over time in this condition, leaving its 6-week recall lowest; 6-week recall was similar for High-emotion and Text-only warnings. Greater recall was associated with higher risk perceptions and greater quit intentions and mediated part of warning-label effects on these important smoking outcomes. High-emotion warnings had additional non-memory-related effects on risk perceptions and quit intentions that were superior to text-only warnings.
CONCLUSIONS: High- but not Low-emotion pictorial warning labels may support the Food and Drug Administration's primary goal to "effectively convey the negative health consequences of smoking." CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03375840. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emotion; Memory; Pictorial warning labels; Quit intentions; Risk knowledge; Risk perceptions; Smoking

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29947729      PMCID: PMC6289901          DOI: 10.1093/abm/kay050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  27 in total

1.  Recognition memory for emotionally negative and neutral words: an ERP study.

Authors:  E J Maratos; K Allan; M D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour.

Authors:  D Hammond; G T Fong; P W McDonald; R Cameron; K S Brown
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Effect of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Changes in Smoking Behavior: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Marissa G Hall; Seth M Noar; Humberto Parada; Al Stein-Seroussi; Laura E Bach; Sean Hanley; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Correcting over 50 years of tobacco industry misinformation.

Authors:  Philip Smith; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Richard O'Connor; Anthony Brown; Chris Banthin; Sara Guardino-Colket; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Emotional reaction facilitates the brain and behavioural impact of graphic cigarette warning labels in smokers.

Authors:  An-Li Wang; Steven B Lowen; Daniel Romer; Mario Giorno; Daniel D Langleben
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Kathy Z Tang; Daniel Romer; Christopher Jepson; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.

Authors:  M M Bradley; P J Lang
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03

8.  Risk perception measures' associations with behavior intentions, affect, and cognition following colon cancer screening messages.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Rebecca A Ferrer; Peter A Ubel; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Emotion in the Law and the Lab: The Case of Graphic Cigarette Warnings.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Abigail T Evans; Natalie Hemmerich; Micah Berman
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 10.  Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Marissa G Hall; Diane B Francis; Kurt M Ribisl; Jessica K Pepper; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evidence-based recommendations for communicating the impacts of climate change on health.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Patrick Boyd; Linda D Cameron; Noshir Contractor; Michael A Diefenbach; Sara Fleszar-Pavlovic; Ezra Markowitz; Renee N Salas; Keri K Stephens
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.626

2.  How marijuana use status affects responses to anti-marijuana messages.

Authors:  Elise M Stevens; Glenn Leshner; Amy M Cohn; Seunghyun Kim; Theodore L Wagener
Journal:  Cannabis       Date:  2021-05-19

Review 3.  A Narrative Review of the Efficacy and Design of Safety Labels on Tobacco Products to Promote the Use of Safety Labels on Alcohol Products in Canada.

Authors:  Man Ting Kristina Yau; Kiana W Yau; Trana Hussaini; Eric M Yoshida
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-24

4.  Harm Perception in Response to Pictorial Warning Labels Predict Higher Non-Smoking Intention among Korean Adolescents.

Authors:  Jun Hyun Hwang; Soon-Woo Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.