Literature DB >> 29241972

Towards machine learned quality control: A benchmark for sharpness quantification in digital pathology.

Gabriele Campanella1, Arjun R Rajanna2, Lorraine Corsale3, Peter J Schüffler2, Yukako Yagi3, Thomas J Fuchs4.   

Abstract

Pathology is on the verge of a profound change from an analog and qualitative to a digital and quantitative discipline. This change is mostly driven by the high-throughput scanning of microscope slides in modern pathology departments, reaching tens of thousands of digital slides per month. The resulting vast digital archives form the basis of clinical use in digital pathology and allow large scale machine learning in computational pathology. One of the most crucial bottlenecks of high-throughput scanning is quality control (QC). Currently, digital slides are screened manually to detected out-of-focus regions, to compensate for the limitations of scanner software. We present a solution to this problem by introducing a benchmark dataset for blur detection, an in-depth comparison of state-of-the art sharpness descriptors and their prediction performance within a random forest framework. Furthermore, we show that convolution neural networks, like residual networks, can be used to train blur detectors from scratch. We thoroughly evaluate the accuracy of feature based and deep learning based approaches for sharpness classification (99.74% accuracy) and regression (MSE 0.004) and additionally compare them to domain experts in a comprehensive human perception study. Our pipeline outputs spacial heatmaps enabling to quantify and localize blurred areas on a slide. Finally, we tested the proposed framework in the clinical setting and demonstrate superior performance over the state-of-the-art QC pipeline comprising commercial software and human expert inspection by reducing the error rate from 17% to 4.7%.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational pathology; Deep learning; Digital pathology; Machine learning; Quality control; Quantitative blur detection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29241972      PMCID: PMC9113532          DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2017.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   7.422


  12 in total

1.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.

Authors:  Zhou Wang; Alan Conrad Bovik; Hamid Rahim Sheikh; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  Comparison of autofocus methods for automated microscopy.

Authors:  L Firestone; K Cook; K Culp; N Talsania; K Preston
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1991

3.  A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms.

Authors:  Hamid Rahim Sheikh; Muhammad Farooq Sabir; Alan Conrad Bovik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  A no-reference objective image sharpness metric based on the notion of just noticeable blur (JNB).

Authors:  Rony Ferzli; Lina J Karam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  A no-reference image blur metric based on the cumulative probability of blur detection (CPBD).

Authors:  Niranjan D Narvekar; Lina J Karam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 6.  Digital imaging in pathology: whole-slide imaging and beyond.

Authors:  Farzad Ghaznavi; Andrew Evans; Anant Madabhushi; Michael Feldman
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 23.472

7.  Computational pathology: challenges and promises for tissue analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Fuchs; Joachim M Buhmann
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  OpenSlide: A vendor-neutral software foundation for digital pathology.

Authors:  Adam Goode; Benjamin Gilbert; Jan Harkes; Drazen Jukic; Mahadev Satyanarayanan
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2013-09-27

9.  Semantic focusing allows fully automated single-layer slide scanning of cervical cytology slides.

Authors:  Bernd Lahrmann; Nektarios A Valous; Urs Eisenmann; Nicolas Wentzensen; Niels Grabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An automated blur detection method for histological whole slide imaging.

Authors:  Xavier Moles Lopez; Etienne D'Andrea; Paul Barbot; Anne-Sophie Bridoux; Sandrine Rorive; Isabelle Salmon; Olivier Debeir; Christine Decaestecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing the Value of Histopathological Assessment of Allograft Biopsy Monitoring.

Authors:  Michelle A Wood-Trageser; Andrew J Lesniak; Anthony J Demetris
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Out-of-focus brain image detection in serial tissue sections.

Authors:  Angeliki Pollatou; Daniel D Ferrante
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.987

3.  Whole-Slide Image Focus Quality: Automatic Assessment and Impact on AI Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Timo Kohlberger; Yun Liu; Melissa Moran; Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen; Trissia Brown; Jason D Hipp; Craig H Mermel; Martin C Stumpe
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2019-12-12

4.  A Regulatory Science Initiative to Harmonize and Standardize Digital Pathology and Machine Learning Processes to Speed up Clinical Innovation to Patients.

Authors:  Hetal Desai Marble; Richard Huang; Sarah Nixon Dudgeon; Amanda Lowe; Markus D Herrmann; Scott Blakely; Matthew O Leavitt; Mike Isaacs; Matthew G Hanna; Ashish Sharma; Jithesh Veetil; Pamela Goldberg; Joachim H Schmid; Laura Lasiter; Brandon D Gallas; Esther Abels; Jochen K Lennerz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2020-08-06

5.  How to learn with intentional mistakes: NoisyEnsembles to overcome poor tissue quality for deep learning in computational pathology.

Authors:  Robin S Mayer; Steffen Gretser; Lara E Heckmann; Paul K Ziegler; Britta Walter; Henning Reis; Katrin Bankov; Sven Becker; Jochen Triesch; Peter J Wild; Nadine Flinner
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-29

6.  Quality control stress test for deep learning-based diagnostic model in digital pathology.

Authors:  Birgid Schömig-Markiefka; Alexey Pryalukhin; Wolfgang Hulla; Andrey Bychkov; Junya Fukuoka; Anant Madabhushi; Viktor Achter; Lech Nieroda; Reinhard Büttner; Alexander Quaas; Yuri Tolkach
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Automated quality assessment of large digitised histology cohorts by artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Maryam Haghighat; Lisa Browning; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Stefano Malacrino; Nasullah Khalid Alham; Richard Colling; Ying Cui; Emad Rakha; Freddie C Hamdy; Clare Verrill; Jens Rittscher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.