Literature DB >> 2036914

Comparison of autofocus methods for automated microscopy.

L Firestone1, K Cook, K Culp, N Talsania, K Preston.   

Abstract

Traditional autofocus methods were designed for microscopes driven by single processor computers. As computers are developed that exploit massive parallelism when acquiring and analyzing images, parallel cellular logic techniques became available to focus automatically. This paper introduces the reader to both cellular logic techniques for autofocus and a new spectral moment autofocus measure. It then compares these methods with more traditional autofocus methods. It is shown that traditional methods based on measurements of image power-give the best results when tested on one set of real images and two sets of synthetic images. The next best methods are the cellular logic and spectral moment techniques, while the worst are those based on the image probability density function or histogram.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2036914     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990120302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  24 in total

1.  Digital slide and virtual microscopy based routine and telepathology evaluation of routine gastrointestinal biopsy specimens.

Authors:  B Molnar; L Berczi; C Diczhazy; A Tagscherer; S V Varga; B Szende; Z Tulassay
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Automated quantitative live cell fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Michael Fero; Kit Pogliano
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  InstantScope: a low-cost whole slide imaging system with instant focal plane detection.

Authors:  Kaikai Guo; Jun Liao; Zichao Bian; Xin Heng; Guoan Zheng
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Automated frame selection process for high-resolution microendoscopy.

Authors:  Ayumu Ishijima; Richard A Schwarz; Dongsuk Shin; Sharon Mondrik; Nadarajah Vigneswaran; Ann M Gillenwater; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Non-common path aberration correction in an adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Yusufu N Sulai; Alfredo Dubra
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Single-frame rapid autofocusing for brightfield and fluorescence whole slide imaging.

Authors:  Jun Liao; Liheng Bian; Zichao Bian; Zibang Zhang; Charmi Patel; Kazunori Hoshino; Yonina C Eldar; Guoan Zheng
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Automated focusing in bright-field microscopy for tuberculosis detection.

Authors:  O A Osibote; R Dendere; S Krishnan; T S Douglas
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.758

8.  Extended Twilight among Isogenic C. elegans Causes a Disproportionate Scaling between Lifespan and Health.

Authors:  William B Zhang; Drew B Sinha; William E Pittman; Erik Hvatum; Nicholas Stroustrup; Zachary Pincus
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.304

9.  Automatic section thickness determination using an absolute gradient focus function.

Authors:  D T Elozory; K A Kramer; B Chaudhuri; O P Bonam; D B Goldgof; L O Hall; P R Mouton
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Software-Based Phase Control, Video-Rate Imaging, and Real-Time Mosaicing With a Lissajous-Scanned Confocal Microscope.

Authors:  Nathan O Loewke; Zhen Qiu; Michael J Mandella; Robert Ertsey; Adrienne Loewke; Lisa A Gunaydin; Eben L Rosenthal; Christopher H Contag; Olav Solgaard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.