Sachin Nayyar1, Lauren Wilson1, Anand Ganesan1, Thomas Sullivan2, Pawel Kuklik1, Glenn Young1, Prashanthan Sanders1, Kurt C Roberts-Thomson3. 1. Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Level 5, McEwin Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. 2. School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 3. Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Level 5, McEwin Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. kurt.roberts-thomson@adelaide.edu.au.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Protected channels of surviving myocytes in late postinfarction ventricular scar predispose to ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, only a few patients develop VT spontaneously. We studied differences in electric remodeling and protected channels in late postinfarction patients with and without spontaneous VT. METHODS: Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with recurrent sustained monomorphic VT (n = 22) were compared with stable ICM patients without spontaneous VT (control group; n = 5). Left ventricular mapping was performed with a 20-pole catheter. Detailed pace mapping was used to identify channels of protected conduction, and confirmed, when feasible, by entrainment. Anatomical and electrophysiological properties of VT channels and non-VT channels in VT patients and channels in controls were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-three (median 3) VTs were inducible in VT patients compared to two (median 0) in controls. The VT channels in VT patients (n = 57, 3 ± 1 per patient) were lengthier (mean ± SEM 53 ± 5 vs. 33 ± 4 vs. 24 ± 8 mm), had longer S-QRS (73 ± 4 vs. 63 ± 3 vs. 44 ± 8 ms), longer conduction time (103 ± 13 vs. 33 ± 4 vs. 24 ± 8 ms), and slower conduction velocity (CV) (0.85 ± 0.21 vs. 1.39 ± 0.20 vs. 1.31 ± 0.41 m/s) than non-VT channels in VT patients (n = 183, 8 ± 6 per patient) (p ≤ 0.01) and channels in controls (n = 46, 9 ± 8 per patient) (p ≤ 0.01). Additionally, non-VT channels in VT patients had longer S-QRS (p = 0.02); however, they were similar in length, conduction time, and CV compared to channels in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Channels supporting VT are lengthier, with longer conduction times and slower CV compared to channels in patients without spontaneous VT. These observations may explain why some ICM patients have spontaneous VT and others do not.
PURPOSE: Protected channels of surviving myocytes in late postinfarction ventricular scar predispose to ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, only a few patients develop VT spontaneously. We studied differences in electric remodeling and protected channels in late postinfarction patients with and without spontaneous VT. METHODS:Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with recurrent sustained monomorphic VT (n = 22) were compared with stable ICM patients without spontaneous VT (control group; n = 5). Left ventricular mapping was performed with a 20-pole catheter. Detailed pace mapping was used to identify channels of protected conduction, and confirmed, when feasible, by entrainment. Anatomical and electrophysiological properties of VT channels and non-VT channels in VTpatients and channels in controls were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-three (median 3) VTs were inducible in VTpatients compared to two (median 0) in controls. The VT channels in VTpatients (n = 57, 3 ± 1 per patient) were lengthier (mean ± SEM 53 ± 5 vs. 33 ± 4 vs. 24 ± 8 mm), had longer S-QRS (73 ± 4 vs. 63 ± 3 vs. 44 ± 8 ms), longer conduction time (103 ± 13 vs. 33 ± 4 vs. 24 ± 8 ms), and slower conduction velocity (CV) (0.85 ± 0.21 vs. 1.39 ± 0.20 vs. 1.31 ± 0.41 m/s) than non-VT channels in VTpatients (n = 183, 8 ± 6 per patient) (p ≤ 0.01) and channels in controls (n = 46, 9 ± 8 per patient) (p ≤ 0.01). Additionally, non-VT channels in VTpatients had longer S-QRS (p = 0.02); however, they were similar in length, conduction time, and CV compared to channels in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Channels supporting VT are lengthier, with longer conduction times and slower CV compared to channels in patients without spontaneous VT. These observations may explain why some ICM patients have spontaneous VT and others do not.
Authors: Andrew E Epstein; John P Dimarco; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Roger A Freedman; Leonard S Gettes; A Marc Gillinov; Gabriel Gregoratos; Stephen C Hammill; David L Hayes; Mark A Hlatky; L Kristin Newby; Richard L Page; Mark H Schoenfeld; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Michael O Sweeney Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2008-05-19 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Corinna B Brunckhorst; William G Stevenson; Kyoko Soejima; William H Maisel; Etienne Delacretaz; Peter L Friedman; Shlomo A Ben-Haim Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-03-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sachin Nayyar; Lauren Wilson; Anand N Ganesan; Thomas Sullivan; Pawel Kuklik; Darius Chapman; Anthony G Brooks; Rajiv Mahajan; Mathias Baumert; Glenn D Young; Prashanthan Sanders; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-01-01
Authors: Sachin Nayyar; Pawel Kuklik; Anand N Ganesan; Thomas R Sullivan; Lauren Wilson; Glenn D Young; Prashanthan Sanders; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2016-12
Authors: Christian de Chillou; Dominique Lacroix; Didier Klug; Isabelle Magnin-Poull; Christelle Marquié; Marc Messier; Marius Andronache; Claude Kouakam; Nicolas Sadoul; Jian Chen; Etienne Aliot; Salem Kacet Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-02-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J M de Bakker; R Coronel; S Tasseron; A A Wilde; T Opthof; M J Janse; F J van Capelle; A E Becker; G Jambroes Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1990-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D M Cassidy; J A Vassallo; J M Miller; D S Poll; A E Buxton; F E Marchlinski; M E Josephson Journal: Circulation Date: 1986-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Konstantinos N Aronis; Rheeda L Ali; Jonathan Chrispin; Natalia A Trayanova; Adityo Prakosa; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Ronald D Berger; Joe B Hakim; Jialiu Liang; Harikrishna Tandri; Fei Teng Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-03-19