Literature DB >> 24382409

High-density mapping of ventricular scar: a comparison of ventricular tachycardia (VT) supporting channels with channels that do not support VT.

Sachin Nayyar1, Lauren Wilson, Anand N Ganesan, Thomas Sullivan, Pawel Kuklik, Darius Chapman, Anthony G Brooks, Rajiv Mahajan, Mathias Baumert, Glenn D Young, Prashanthan Sanders, Kurt C Roberts-Thomson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surviving myocytes within scar may form channels that support ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits. There are little data on the properties of channels that comprise VT circuits and those that are non-VT supporting channels. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 22 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT, high-density mapping was performed with the PentaRay catheter and Ensite NavX system during sinus rhythm. A channel was defined as a series of matching pace-maps with a stimulus (S) to QRS time of ≥40 ms. Sites were determined to be part of a VT channel if there were matching pace-maps to the VT morphology. This was confirmed with entrainment mapping when possible. Of the 238 channels identified, 57 channels corresponded to an inducible VT. Channels that were part of a VT circuit were more commonly located within dense scar than non-VT channels (97% versus 82%; P=0.036). VT supporting channels were of greater length (mean±SEM, 53±5 versus 33±4 mm), had higher longest S-QRS (130±12 versus 82±12 ms), longer conduction time (103±14 versus 43±13 ms), and slower conduction velocity (0.87±0.23 versus 1.39±0.21 m/s) than non-VT channels (P<0.001). Of all the fractionated, late, and very late potentials located in scar, only 21%, 26%, and 29%, respectively, were recorded within VT channels.
CONCLUSIONS: High-density mapping shows substantial differences among channels in ventricular scar. Channels supporting VT are more commonly located in dense scar, longer than non-VT channels, and have slower conduction velocity. Only a minority of scar-related potentials participate in the VT supporting channels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  catheter ablation; ischemic cardiomyopathy; substrate ablation; tachycardia, ventricular

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24382409     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  16 in total

1.  Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: The importance of substrate modification.

Authors:  Konstantinos P Letsas; Michael Efremidis; Nikolaos P Sgouros; Konstantinos Vlachos; Dimitrios Asvestas; Antonios Sideris
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-26

Review 2.  Novel Mapping Strategies for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation.

Authors:  Zaid Aziz; Roderick Tung
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-23

3.  Electrophysiologic features of protected channels in late postinfarction patients with and without spontaneous ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Sachin Nayyar; Lauren Wilson; Anand Ganesan; Thomas Sullivan; Pawel Kuklik; Glenn Young; Prashanthan Sanders; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Non-contrast-enhanced T1 -weighted MRI of myocardial radiofrequency ablation lesions.

Authors:  Michael A Guttman; Susumu Tao; Sarah Fink; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Henry R Halperin; Daniel A Herzka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy-induced proarrhythmia: understanding preferential conduction within myocardial scars.

Authors:  Jason S Bradfield; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-12

6.  Repolarization Heterogeneity in Human Post-Infarct Ventricular Tachycardia.

Authors:  David J Callans; J Kevin Donahue
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-06

Review 7.  Catheter ablation for premature ventricular contractions and ventricular tachycardia in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; William G Stevenson; Roy M John
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation - The Right Approach for the Right Patient.

Authors:  Mouhannad M Sadek; Robert D Schaller; Gregory E Supple; David S Frankel; Michael P Riley; Mathew D Hutchinson; Fermin C Garcia; David Lin; Sanjay Dixit; Erica S Zado; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-11-29

9.  High-Density Mapping in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: A PentaRay® Study.

Authors:  Petra Maagh; Arnd Christoph; Henning Dopp; Markus Sebastian Mueller; Gunnar Plehn; Axel Meissner
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2017-12-22

10.  Accuracy of prediction of infarct-related arrhythmic circuits from image-based models reconstructed from low and high resolution MRI.

Authors:  Dongdong Deng; Hermenegild Arevalo; Farhad Pashakhanloo; Adityo Prakosa; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Elliot McVeigh; Henry Halperin; Natalia Trayanova
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.