OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize the relationship of conduction delays detected by pace-mapping, evident as a stimulus to QRS interval (S-QRS) delay >or=40 ms, to ventricular tachycardia (VT) re-entry circuit isthmuses defined by entrainment and ablation. BACKGROUND: Areas of slow conduction and block in old infarcts cause re-entrant VT. METHODS: In 12 patients with VT after infarction, pace-mapping was performed at 890 sites. Stimulus to QRS intervals were measured and plotted in three-dimensional reconstructions of the left ventricle. Conduction delay was defined as >or=40 ms and marked delay as >80 ms. The locations of conduction delays were compared to the locations of 14 target areas, defined as the region within a radius of 2 cm of a re-entry circuit isthmus. RESULTS: Pacing captured at 829 sites; 465 (56%) had no S-QRS delay, 364 (44%) had a delay >or=40 ms, and 127 (15%) had a delay >80 ms. Sites with delays were clustered in 14 discrete regions, 13 of which overlapped target regions. Only 1 of the 14 target regions was not related to an area of S-QRS delay. Sites with marked delays >80 ms were more often in the target (52%) than sites with delays 40 to 80 ms (29%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of abnormal conduction during pace-mapping can be used to focus mapping during induced VT to a discrete region of the infarct. Further study is warranted to determine if targeting regions of conduction delay may allow ablation of VT during stable sinus rhythm without mapping during VT.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize the relationship of conduction delays detected by pace-mapping, evident as a stimulus to QRS interval (S-QRS) delay >or=40 ms, to ventricular tachycardia (VT) re-entry circuit isthmuses defined by entrainment and ablation. BACKGROUND: Areas of slow conduction and block in old infarcts cause re-entrant VT. METHODS: In 12 patients with VT after infarction, pace-mapping was performed at 890 sites. Stimulus to QRS intervals were measured and plotted in three-dimensional reconstructions of the left ventricle. Conduction delay was defined as >or=40 ms and marked delay as >80 ms. The locations of conduction delays were compared to the locations of 14 target areas, defined as the region within a radius of 2 cm of a re-entry circuit isthmus. RESULTS: Pacing captured at 829 sites; 465 (56%) had no S-QRS delay, 364 (44%) had a delay >or=40 ms, and 127 (15%) had a delay >80 ms. Sites with delays were clustered in 14 discrete regions, 13 of which overlapped target regions. Only 1 of the 14 target regions was not related to an area of S-QRS delay. Sites with marked delays >80 ms were more often in the target (52%) than sites with delays 40 to 80 ms (29%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of abnormal conduction during pace-mapping can be used to focus mapping during induced VT to a discrete region of the infarct. Further study is warranted to determine if targeting regions of conduction delay may allow ablation of VT during stable sinus rhythm without mapping during VT.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Takeshi Sasaki; Christopher F Miller; Rozann Hansford; Vadim Zipunnikov; Menekhem M Zviman; Joseph E Marine; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Harikrishna Tandri; Sunil Sinha; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Stefan L Zimmerman; David A Bluemke; Gordon F Tomaselli; Ronald D Berger; Henry R Halperin; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2013-11-14
Authors: Konstantinos N Aronis; Rheeda L Ali; Jonathan Chrispin; Natalia A Trayanova; Adityo Prakosa; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Ronald D Berger; Joe B Hakim; Jialiu Liang; Harikrishna Tandri; Fei Teng Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-03-19
Authors: Rahul K Mukherjee; Caroline Mendonca Costa; Radhouene Neji; James L Harrison; Iain Sim; Steven E Williams; John Whitaker; Henry Chubb; Louisa O'Neill; Rainer Schneider; Tom Lloyd; Thomas Pohl; Sébastien Roujol; Steven A Niederer; Reza Razavi; Mark D O'Neill Journal: Europace Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Tarvinder S Dhanjal; Nicolas Lellouche; Christopher J von Ruhland; Guillaume Abehsira; David H Edwards; Jean-Luc Dubois-Randé; Konstantinos Moschonas; Emmanuel Teiger; Alan J Williams; Christopher H George Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2017-07