Literature DB >> 29236127

[Basic knowledge on the efficacy of hearing aids depending on the type of hearing impairment for Ear, Nose & Throat specialists].

T Steffens1, S C Marcrum2.   

Abstract

For Ear, Nose & Throat specialists, the physiological and psychoacoustical deficits related to hearing impairment and the compensatory capabilities of hearing aids are topics of prime importance. In conductive hearing loss, the foremost deficit is decreased audibility, for which hearing aids can compensate almost entirely through the use of level independent gain. In the instance of sensorineural hearing loss, however, the irreversible loss of outer and inner hair cells causes a distorted sound perception, which is particularly troublesome when trying to understand speech in noisy environments. Unfortunately, this distortion cannot be compensated through the use of hearing aids. Nevertheless, in particular listening environments, its effects can be lessened by reducing background noise levels through the use of directional microphones and, to a lesser extent, digital noise reduction. Noise reduction is in many cases also the main effect to improve speech discrimination in retrocochlear hearing loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory perception; Conductive hearing loss; Retrocochlear diseases; Sensorineural hearing loss; Speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29236127     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-017-0457-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  20 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Effect of absence of cochlear outer hair cells on behavioural auditory threshold.

Authors:  A Ryan; P Dallos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  R L Miller; J R Schilling; K R Franck; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to multiple-tone complexes.

Authors:  L Deng; C D Geisler; S Greenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave.

Authors:  B M Johnstone; R Patuzzi; G K Yates
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people.

Authors:  R W Peters; B C Moore; T Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Real-world benefit from directional microphone hearing aids.

Authors:  David Gnewikow; Todd Ricketts; Gene W Bratt; Laura C Mutchler
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2009

Review 10.  Functionality of hearing aids: state-of-the-art and future model-based solutions.

Authors:  Birger Kollmeier; Jürgen Kiessling
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms].

Authors:  C Dörfler; T Hocke; A Hast; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Audiometric test battery for presbycusis].

Authors:  T Steffens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.284

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.