Literature DB >> 521557

Psychophysical frequency resolution in the cat as determined by simultaneous masking and its relation to auditory-nerve resolution.

J O Pickles.   

Abstract

Critical bandwidths were measured behaviorally at 1 and 2 kHz by simultaneous masking in four cats. Three methods were used. They were (i) the masking of a tone by noise of variable bandwidth, (ii) the masking of a narrow-band signal by two tones, and (iii) the masking of a tone by noise of rippled spectrum. The three methods agreed closely and gave a mean critical bandwidth of 410 Hz at 1 kHz and 690 Hz at 2 kHz. These values were about three times as great as the electrophysiologically-determined effective bandwidths of single fibers of the auditory nerve at the same frequencies, both as measured in other animals, and in one of the animals that had been tested behaviorally as well. Psychophysical tuning curves were also determined behaviorally; in contrast, they agreed closely with auditory-nerve fibers in both bandwidth and slope. The results suggest that the critical band as measured by simultaneous masking is not a close relation of the frequency-threshold curve of auditory-nerve fibers, but that the psychophysical tuning curve possibly may be. Possible reasons and implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 521557     DOI: 10.1121/1.383645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; John B Issa; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

2.  Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech.

Authors:  Eric D Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

4.  Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Correlation of neural response properties with auditory thalamus subdivisions in the awake marmoset.

Authors:  Edward L Bartlett; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The interaural time difference pathway: a comparison of spectral bandwidth and correlation sensitivity at three anatomical levels.

Authors:  Myles McLaughlin; Tom P Franken; Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-09

Review 7.  Rodent auditory perception: Critical band limitations and plasticity.

Authors:  J King; M Insanally; M Jin; A R O Martins; J A D'amour; R C Froemke
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Fine frequency tuning in monkey auditory cortex and thalamus.

Authors:  Edward L Bartlett; Srivatsun Sadagopan; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Frequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Margit E Dylla; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Encoding intensity in ventral cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma: implications for loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Wei-Li D Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.