Literature DB >> 29222719

Longevity of visual improvements following transcorneal electrical stimulation and efficacy of retreatment in three individuals with retinitis pigmentosa.

Ava K Bittner1, Kenneth Seger2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A small-scale randomized controlled trial conducted by our group found that four of seven retinitis pigmentosa (RP) subjects who received six weekly Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation (TES) sessions developed significant improvements in visual acuity (VA), quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF), and/or Goldmann visual fields (GVF). We longitudinally monitored three of these participants for declining visual function due to natural RP progression to determine the duration of their responses and administered retreatments.
METHODS: Over a period of 29-35 months, repeated ETDRS VA, qCSF and/or GVF tests and three to six TES treatment courses consisting of six weekly sessions were administered in each eye of three RP participants every four to 16 months in an unmasked, prospective case series study.
RESULTS: For two participants, there were significant VA improvements of 44-52 letters (0.88-1.04 logMAR) and 15-23 letters (0.3-0.46 logMAR) in the worse eye at baseline after each of three or four treatment courses of TES compared to initial baseline. They had no significant decreases from baseline for VA or qCSF over 29 to 35 months, The third participant had a significant mean improvement in VA in the eye with better baseline vision (p = 0.004) and binocularly (p < 0.001) following six treatment courses over the 29-month period. For the first two participants, mean annual rates of GVF change for each eye ranged from -5% to 0% with the V4e stimulus, and -26% to +33% the III4e stimulus. The third participant's mean annual GVF changes were +14 to +35%, with a statistically significant improvement across 29 months for both the V4e and III4e stimuli in the right eye (p = 0.045; p = 0.015) and the V4e stimulus in the left eye (p = 0.047).
CONCLUSION: Following encouraging visual improvements after TES that lasted for several months, it appears it may be possible to restore and prevent slowly diminishing vision over time with retreatments, which requires confirmation in a large-scale randomized controlled trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast sensitivity; Goldmann visual field; Retinitis pigmentosa; Transcorneal electrical stimulation; Visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29222719      PMCID: PMC6039224          DOI: 10.1007/s00417-017-3858-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  12 in total

1.  Retrospective longitudinal study of visual acuity change in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  M F Flynn; G A Fishman; R J Anderson; D K Roberts
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Variability and Errors of Manually Digitized Goldmann Visual Fields.

Authors:  Michael P Barry; Ava K Bittner; Liancheng Yang; Rebecca Marcus; Mian Haris Iftikhar; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Transcorneal electrical stimulation for patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled exploratory study.

Authors:  Andreas Schatz; Tobias Röck; Lubka Naycheva; Gabriel Willmann; Barbara Wilhelm; Tobias Peters; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Eberhart Zrenner; André Messias; Florian Gekeler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Test-retest, within-visit variability of Goldmann visual fields in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Mian Haris Iftikhar; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Randomized controlled trial of electro-stimulation therapies to modulate retinal blood flow and visual function in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Kenneth Seger; Rachel Salveson; Samantha Kayser; Natalia Morrison; Patricia Vargas; Deborah Mendelsohn; Jorge Han; Hua Bi; Gislin Dagnelie; Alexandra Benavente; Jessica Ramella-Roman
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 6.  Electrical Stimulation as a Means for Improving Vision.

Authors:  Amer Sehic; Shuai Guo; Kin-Sang Cho; Rima M Corraya; Dong F Chen; Tor P Utheim
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Topographic Quantification of the Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation (TES)-Induced Protective Effects on N-Methyl-N-Nitrosourea-Treated Retinas.

Authors:  Ye Tao; Tao Chen; Zhong-Yu Liu; Li-Qiang Wang; Wei-Wei Xu; Li-Min Qin; Guang-Hua Peng; Huang Yi-Fei
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Rate of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  S Grover; G A Fishman; R J Anderson; K R Alexander; D J Derlacki
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation for Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Follow-up Study Over 1 Year.

Authors:  Andreas Schatz; Johanna Pach; Mariya Gosheva; Lubka Naycheva; Gabriel Willmann; Barbara Wilhelm; Tobias Peters; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Eberhart Zrenner; André Messias; Florian Gekeler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Evaluation of residual retinal function by pupillary constrictions and phosphenes using transcorneal electrical stimulation in patients with retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Takeshi Morimoto; Takehiro Fukui; Kenji Matsushita; Yoshitaka Okawa; Hiroshi Shimojyo; Shunji Kusaka; Yasuo Tano; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Ocular Cells: A Means for Improving Ocular Tissue Engineering and Treatments of Eye Diseases.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sanie-Jahromi; Ali Azizi; Sahar Shariat; Mohammadkarim Johari
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Residual vision activation and the brain-eye-vascular triad: Dysregulation, plasticity and restoration in low vision and blindness - a review.

Authors:  Bernhard A Sabel; Josef Flammer; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  Current Approaches to Low Vision (Re)Habilitation

Authors:  Deniz Altınbay; Şefay Aysun İdil
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-27

4.  Non-invasive electrical stimulation as a potential treatment for retinal degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Karen Chang; Sam Enayati; Kin-Sang Cho; Tor P Utheim; Dong Feng Chen
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 6.058

5.  Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Beomseo Koo; James D Weiland
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.048

6.  Non-invasive current stimulation in vision recovery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Cecilia Perin; Barbara Viganò; Daniele Piscitelli; Barbara Maria Matteo; Roberto Meroni; Cesare Giuseppe Cerri
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.406

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.