Literature DB >> 9082273

Rate of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa.

S Grover1, G A Fishman, R J Anderson, K R Alexander, D J Derlacki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors quantitate the rate of visual field loss in patients with retinitis pigmentosa as it relates to different clinical field phenotypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Goldmann visual fields were obtained with target V4e in 77 patients and with target II4e in 71 patients who had either isolated or various genetic types of retinitis pigmentosa and who met certain entrance criteria. The visual fields were categorized into five distinct clinical field phenotypes on the basis of their pattern of field loss. Mixed-model methods for the analysis of longitudinal data were used to model the natural logarithm of the visual field area as a function of patient age and clinical field phenotype. The average half-life (time over which half of the remaining field area would be lost) of the visual field area for each phenotype was computed from the results of this analysis. Visual field data were not analyzed for patients with a normal clinical field phenotype (type 1).
RESULTS: Independent of the field phenotype, average half-life values were 7.3 years for target V4e and 6.8 years for target II4e, which were not statistically different (P = 0.16). Visual fields with partial or complete midperipheral ring scotomas (type 2) and those with only a residual central field (type 4) had a half-life of 9.5 and 9.4 years, respectively, for target V4e, and 8.9 and 8.0 years, respectively, for target II4e. Patients with partial peripheral restriction (type 5) lost visual fields with a half-life of 9.5 years for target V4e and 7.3 years for target II4e. None of these differences in the half-lives between the different phenotypes were statistically significant for either targets V4e or II4e. Fields with a residual central area and remaining temporal and/or nasal islands (type 3) had a half-life of 4.8 years for target V4e and 6.0 years for target II4e. The differences in half-lives between type 3 and each of the other field phenotypes were statistically significant for the V4e target, but not for the II4e target.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study can be useful for counseling patients with retinitis pigmentosa and various visual field phenotypes as to their potential rate of visual field loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9082273     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30291-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  49 in total

1.  Treatment with taurine, diltiazem, and vitamin E retards the progressive visual field reduction in retinitis pigmentosa: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Herminia Pasantes-Morales; Hugo Quiroz; Octavio Quesada
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 2.  [Retinitis pigmentosa - a review. Pathogenesis, guidelines for diagnostics and perspectives].

Authors:  D Zobor; E Zrenner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Relationship between foveal cone structure and clinical measures of visual function in patients with inherited retinal degenerations.

Authors:  Kavitha Ratnam; Joseph Carroll; Travis C Porco; Jacque L Duncan; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Disease course of patients with unilateral pigmentary retinopathy.

Authors:  Emorfily Potsidis; Eliot L Berson; Michael A Sandberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Adaptive optics retinal imaging: emerging clinical applications.

Authors:  Pooja Godara; Adam M Dubis; Austin Roorda; Jacque L Duncan; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Short-term outcomes of subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injections in patients with retinitis pigmentosa-associated cystoid macular edema unresponsive to carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.

Authors:  Buğra Karasu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  The clinical efficacy of a topical dorzolamide in the management of cystoid macular edema in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ikeda; Toshio Hisatomi; Noriko Yoshida; Shoji Notomi; Yusuke Murakami; Hiroshi Enaida; Tatsuro Ishibashi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Relationships among multifocal electroretinogram amplitude, visual field sensitivity, and SD-OCT receptor layer thicknesses in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Yuquan Wen; Martin Klein; Donald C Hood; David G Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa caused by mutations in the MAK gene.

Authors:  Edwin M Stone; Xunda Luo; Elise Héon; Byron L Lam; Richard G Weleber; Jennifer A Halder; Louisa M Affatigato; Jacqueline B Goldberg; Alexander Sumaroka; Sharon B Schwartz; Artur V Cideciyan; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Retinal laminar architecture in human retinitis pigmentosa caused by Rhodopsin gene mutations.

Authors:  Tomas S Aleman; Artur V Cideciyan; Alexander Sumaroka; Elizabeth A M Windsor; Waldo Herrera; D Alan White; Shalesh Kaushal; Anjani Naidu; Alejandro J Roman; Sharon B Schwartz; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.