Literature DB >> 27643530

Electrical Stimulation as a Means for Improving Vision.

Amer Sehic1, Shuai Guo2, Kin-Sang Cho3, Rima M Corraya2, Dong F Chen3, Tor P Utheim4.   

Abstract

Evolving research has provided evidence that noninvasive electrical stimulation (ES) of the eye may be a promising therapy for either preserving or restoring vision in several retinal and optic nerve diseases. In this review, we focus on minimally invasive strategies for the delivery of ES and accordingly summarize the current literature on transcorneal, transorbital, and transpalpebral ES in both animal experiments and clinical studies. Various mechanisms are believed to underlie the effects of ES, including increased production of neurotrophic agents, improved chorioretinal blood circulation, and inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines. Different animal models have demonstrated favorable effects of ES on both the retina and the optic nerve. Promising effects of ES have also been demonstrated in clinical studies; however, all current studies have a lack of randomization and/or a control group (sham). There is thus a pressing need for a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms that govern clinical success and optimization of stimulation parameters in animal studies. In addition, such research should be followed by large, prospective, clinical studies to explore the full potential of ES. Through this review, we aim to provide insight to guide future research on ES as a potential therapy for improving vision.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27643530      PMCID: PMC5225285          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


  59 in total

1.  Preclinical model of transcorneal alternating current stimulation in freely moving rats.

Authors:  Elena G Sergeeva; Petra Henrich-Noack; Alexander G Gorkin; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Transcorneal alternating current stimulation induces EEG "aftereffects" only in rats with an intact visual system but not after severe optic nerve damage.

Authors:  Elena G Sergeeva; Anton B Fedorov; Petra Henrich-Noack; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Restoration of vision after optic nerve lesions with noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation: a clinical observational study.

Authors:  A Fedorov; S Jobke; V Bersnev; A Chibisova; Y Chibisova; C Gall; B A Sabel
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Transcorneal electrical stimulation shows neuroprotective effects in retinas of light-exposed rats.

Authors:  Andreas Schatz; Blanca Arango-Gonzalez; Dominik Fischer; Heike Enderle; Sylvia Bolz; Tobias Röck; Lubka Naycheva; Christian Grimm; André Messias; Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Gabriel Willmann; Florian Gekeler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Non-invasive alternating current stimulation improves vision in optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Bernhard A Sabel; Anton B Fedorov; Nicole Naue; Antonia Borrmann; Christoph Herrmann; Carolin Gall
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Brain functional connectivity network breakdown and restoration in blindness.

Authors:  Michał Bola; Carolin Gall; Christian Moewes; Anton Fedorov; Hermann Hinrichs; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Neuroprotective effect of transcorneal electrical stimulation on the acute phase of optic nerve injury.

Authors:  Ken-ichiro Miyake; Miho Yoshida; Yoshitsugu Inoue; Yoshio Hata
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Hanna R Coleman; Chi-Chao Chan; Frederick L Ferris; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Proteomic study of retinal proteins associated with transcorneal electric stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Takashi Kanamoto; Nazariy Souchelnytskyi; Takuji Kurimoto; Yasuhiro Ikeda; Hiroaki Sakaue; Yasunari Munemasa; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 1.909

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Using Electrical Stimulation to Enhance the Efficacy of Cell Transplantation Therapies for Neurodegenerative Retinal Diseases: Concepts, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Abby Leigh Manthey; Wei Liu; Zhi Xin Jiang; Marcus Hiu Kong Lee; Jian Ji; Kwok-Fai So; Jimmy Shiu Ming Lai; Vincent Wing Hong Lee; Kin Chiu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Randomized controlled trial of electro-stimulation therapies to modulate retinal blood flow and visual function in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Kenneth Seger; Rachel Salveson; Samantha Kayser; Natalia Morrison; Patricia Vargas; Deborah Mendelsohn; Jorge Han; Hua Bi; Gislin Dagnelie; Alexandra Benavente; Jessica Ramella-Roman
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Longevity of visual improvements following transcorneal electrical stimulation and efficacy of retreatment in three individuals with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Kenneth Seger
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Ocular Cells: A Means for Improving Ocular Tissue Engineering and Treatments of Eye Diseases.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sanie-Jahromi; Ali Azizi; Sahar Shariat; Mohammadkarim Johari
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Neuroprotective strategies for retinal disease.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Rachael S Allen
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Multi-channel transorbital electrical stimulation for effective stimulation of posterior retina.

Authors:  Sangjun Lee; Jimin Park; Jinuk Kwon; Dong Hwan Kim; Chang-Hwan Im
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  ANATOMICAL CHANGES BETWEEN ARGUS II RETINAL PROSTHESIS AND INNER RETINAL LAYERS DETECTED BY SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN FIRST YEAR: A CASE REPORT.

Authors:  Fabio Patelli; Leonardo Colombo; Mohamed Omar M Aly; Luca Rossetti
Journal:  Retin Cases Brief Rep       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 8.  Glaucoma: Biological Trabecular and Neuroretinal Pathology with Perspectives of Therapy Innovation and Preventive Diagnosis.

Authors:  Raffaele Nuzzi; Federico Tridico
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage.

Authors:  Petra Henrich-Noack; Elena G Sergeeva; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation Inhibits Retinal Microglial Activation and Enhances Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival After Acute Ocular Hypertensive Injury.

Authors:  Lin Fu; Frederic K Fung; Amy Cheuk-Yin Lo; Yau-Kei Chan; Kwok-Fai So; Ian Yat-Hin Wong; Kendrick Co Shih; Jimmy Shiu-Ming Lai
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.