BACKGROUND: To evaluate inner-retinal function by pupillary constrictions and phosphenes evoked by transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) in patients with hereditary retinal degeneration. METHODS: Consecutive 20 eyes of 20 patients (16 with retinitis pigmentosa (RP); and four with cone-rod dystrophy (CRD)) whose visual acuity was equal to or worse than 20/2000 at Osaka University Hospital and eight eyes of eight healthy subjects were enrolled. TES was performed on with a contact lens stimulating electrode. The electrically evoked pupillary response (EEPR) was recorded by a pupillometer, and the phosphenes by the subjective responses. Three electrical current thresholds were determined: T1, threshold current for initial phosphene; T2, threshold for eliciting a phosphene extending into the central field; and P, threshold for a relative pupillary constriction > or = 3%. The EEPR and phosphene thresholds were compared with the visual acuity or the visual field. RESULTS: All T1, T2 and P were significantly higher in patients than in normals (Mann-Whitney, P<0.001). Both T1 and T2 were not correlated with visual acuity but depended on the area and location of the residual visual field. T1 and T2 in RP eyes with a EEPR was significantly lower than that in RP eyes without an EEPR. During TES, all subjects and patients had no pain, and no complications except for a slight corneal superficial punctuate keratopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and the efficacy of TES to estimate the residual inner-retinal function in patients with retinal degeneration indicate that TES can be used as one of the most important test to select candidates for retinal prostheses.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate inner-retinal function by pupillary constrictions and phosphenes evoked by transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) in patients with hereditary retinal degeneration. METHODS: Consecutive 20 eyes of 20 patients (16 with retinitis pigmentosa (RP); and four with cone-rod dystrophy (CRD)) whose visual acuity was equal to or worse than 20/2000 at Osaka University Hospital and eight eyes of eight healthy subjects were enrolled. TES was performed on with a contact lens stimulating electrode. The electrically evoked pupillary response (EEPR) was recorded by a pupillometer, and the phosphenes by the subjective responses. Three electrical current thresholds were determined: T1, threshold current for initial phosphene; T2, threshold for eliciting a phosphene extending into the central field; and P, threshold for a relative pupillary constriction > or = 3%. The EEPR and phosphene thresholds were compared with the visual acuity or the visual field. RESULTS: All T1, T2 and P were significantly higher in patients than in normals (Mann-Whitney, P<0.001). Both T1 and T2 were not correlated with visual acuity but depended on the area and location of the residual visual field. T1 and T2 in RP eyes with a EEPR was significantly lower than that in RP eyes without an EEPR. During TES, all subjects and patients had no pain, and no complications except for a slight corneal superficial punctuate keratopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and the efficacy of TES to estimate the residual inner-retinal function in patients with retinal degeneration indicate that TES can be used as one of the most important test to select candidates for retinal prostheses.
Authors: M Haruta; M Kosaka; Y Kanegae; I Saito; T Inoue; R Kageyama; A Nishida; Y Honda; M Takahashi Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: John Xie; Gene-Jack Wang; Lindy Yow; Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland; Carlos J Cela; Hossein Jadvar; Gianluca Lazzi; Elona Dhrami-Gavazi; Stephen H Tsang Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 8.955