Literature DB >> 2922189

New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings.

F F Buechel1, M J Pappas.   

Abstract

A metal-backed, interchangeable, meniscal bearing knee replacement system has been designed to combine low constraint forces with low contact stresses (LCS) to allow nearly normal joint articulation and loading as well as long-term wear resistance of the implants. System components allow unicompartmental, bicompartmental, tricompartmental, and revision knee arthroplasties. In this prospective comparison study, the early series of cases used methyl methacrylate for prosthesis-to-bone fixation, whereas the more recent series of knee replacements used sintered-bead porous coating to allow tissue ingrowth stabilization of all implants. Overall results in the first 149 cemented cases with 2- to 10-year follow-up (mean 7.6 years) were good to excellent in 85.2 per cent, fair in 3.4 per cent, and poor in 11.4 per cent using a strict knee scoring scale. Fair and poor results were seen predominantly in multiply operated and implant revision cases. The best cemented results were noted in primary cases, 95.1 per cent of which had good to excellent results. Overall results in the first 208 cementless cases with 2- to 7-year follow-up (mean 4.4 years) were good to excellent in 91.8 per cent, fair in 2.4 per cent, and poor in 5.8 per cent. Fair and poor results were also seen predominantly in multiply operated and implant revision cases. The best cementless results were noted in primary cases, 98.2 per cent of which had good to excellent results. Of 140 meniscal bearing implants in the entire series, one dislocation occurred (0.7 per cent) which required open bearing replacement. Of 217 rotating platform bearing implants in the entire series, 7 dislocations occurred (3.2 per cent), which required open bearing replacement or revision of components for malposition. These dislocations were seen predominantly in revision cases involving insufficient flexion stability; 6 of the 7 cases were revisions. This study demonstrates the efficacy of mobile bearing elements for use in knee replacement arthroplasty. It is essential that flexion and extension gaps be controlled to maintain contact pressure on such bearings to avoid problems of subluxation or dislocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2922189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  22 in total

1.  Comparative study of tibial posterior slope angle following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using one of three implants.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung Ho Noh; Seong Cheol Moon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [AMC unicondylar prosthesis].

Authors:  G Saxler; D Temmen; G Bontemps
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James B Stiehl; Karel J Hamelynck; Paul E Voorhorst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The Self-Aligning knee prosthesis: clinical and radiological outcome and survival analysis at 5-year follow up.

Authors:  M J F Diks; P G Anderson; J C A D Janssen; G van Stralen; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  [Axis and rotationally correct positioning of bicondylar femoral prosthesis: preoperative planning and intraoperative implementation].

Authors:  H Schläfer; M Schläfer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Farshid Ejtehadi; Rachel Nichols; Leigh Davies; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Factors affecting the osteolysis around the components after posterior-stabilized total knee replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chang Wan Kim; Seung Suk Seo; Jung Han Kim; Hyeong Joo Lee; Chang Rack Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  COMPREHENSIVE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ARTHRITIC KNEE.

Authors:  B K Singh; L C Pandey
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 9.  [From tibiofemoral instability to dislocation in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Pietsch; S Hofmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  NexGen LPS rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Roberto Rossi; Andrea Ferro; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Giacomo Garzaro; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.