Literature DB >> 29221271

Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a safe surgical treatment for locally advanced pathologic T3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Xiaobin Zhang1, Yu Yang1, Bo Ye1, Yifeng Sun1, Xufeng Guo1, Rong Hua1, Teng Mao1, Wentao Fang1, Zhigang Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is safe and feasible. However, several of these studies had selection bias because they included more patients with early-stage cancer, and no study has compared the outcomes of locally advanced pathologic T3 (pT3) esophageal carcinoma between MIE and open surgery.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 229 patients with stage pT3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent esophagectomy from January 2013 to June 2015. The outcomes included operative outcomes, postoperative complications, recurrence, and mid-term survival.
RESULTS: Sixty-six patients underwent MIE and 163 patients underwent open surgery. No significant difference was noted in blood loss or resection completeness (R0) between the two groups. The operative duration was longer in the MIE than open surgery group (266.5±52.5 vs. 218.1±47.4, P<0.01), and the number of lymph nodes dissected was higher in the MIE than open surgery group (15.2±5.3 vs. 12.9±7.3, P=0.01). There was no significant difference in the length of stay or 30-day mortality rate between the two groups, but the intensive care unit stay was shorter in the MIE group (3 vs. 4, P=0.01). No difference in complications or recurrence was noted between the two groups. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 72.8% for MIE and 69.4% for open surgery, and the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 69.4% for MIE and 57.2% for open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with locally advanced stage pT3 ESCC, MIE has perioperative outcomes comparable to those of open surgery without compromising recurrence or survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal carcinoma; locally advanced; minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE)

Year:  2017        PMID: 29221271      PMCID: PMC5708425          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.07.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  21 in total

Review 1.  Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Xiao Ma; Su Yang; Xiaoli Zhu; Wei Qin; Jiaqing Xiang; Toni Lerut; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Luis F Tapias; Douglas J Mathisen; Cameron D Wright; John C Wain; Henning A Gaissert; Ashok Muniappan; Michael Lanuti; Dean M Donahue; Christopher R Morse
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Francesco Palazzo; Ernest L Rosato; Asadulla Chaudhary; Nathaniel R Evans; Jocelyn A Sendecki; Scott Keith; Karen A Chojnacki; Charles J Yeo; Adam C Berger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Oliver C Burdall; Alexander P Boddy; James Fullick; Jane Blazeby; Richard Krysztopik; Christopher Streets; Andrew Hollowood; Christopher P Barham; Dan Titcomb
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Ahmedin Jemal; Nathan Grey; Jacques Ferlay; David Forman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection.

Authors:  Rajeev Parameswaran; Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Rakesh Krishnadas; Martin Cooper; Richard Berrisford; Shahjehan Wajed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty.

Authors:  A L DePaula; K Hashiba; E A Ferreira; R A de Paula; E Grecco
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1995-02

9.  Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Po-Kuei Hsu; Chien-Sheng Huang; Yu-Chung Wu; Teh-Ying Chou; Wen-Hu Hsu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; M Higashino; N Takada; S Lee; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  4 in total

1.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-Shanghai Chest Hospital experience.

Authors:  Bin Li; Yu Yang; Yifeng Sun; Rong Hua; Xiaobin Zhang; Xufeng Guo; Haiyong Gu; Bo Ye; Zhigang Li; Teng Mao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Management of Locally Advanced and Metastatic Esophageal Cancer in the Older Population.

Authors:  Dara Bracken-Clarke; Abdul Rehman Farooq; Anne M Horgan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Safety comparison of minimally invasive abdomen-only esophagectomy versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher P Wang; Michael P Rogers; Gregory Bach; Joseph Sujka; Rahul Mhaskar; Christopher DuCoin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Siaw-Acheampong; S K Kamarajah; R Gujjuri; J R Bundred; P Singh; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-09-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.