Literature DB >> 26806441

Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Ultrasound Using Computerized BI-RADS Features and Machine Learning Methods.

Juan Shan1, S Kaisar Alam2, Brian Garra3, Yingtao Zhang4, Tahira Ahmed5.   

Abstract

This work identifies effective computable features from the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), to develop a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for breast ultrasound. Computerized features corresponding to ultrasound BI-RADs categories were designed and tested using a database of 283 pathology-proven benign and malignant lesions. Features were selected based on classification performance using a "bottom-up" approach for different machine learning methods, including decision tree, artificial neural network, random forest and support vector machine. Using 10-fold cross-validation on the database of 283 cases, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was 0.84 from a support vector machine with 77.7% overall accuracy; the highest overall accuracy, 78.5%, was from a random forest with the AUC 0.83. Lesion margin and orientation were optimum features common to all of the different machine learning methods. These features can be used in CAD systems to help distinguish benign from worrisome lesions.
Copyright © 2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  BI-RADS; Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System; Breast cancer; Computer-aided diagnosis; Computerized features; Machine learning; Receiver operating characteristic; Tissue characterization; Tumor classification; Ultrasonic imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26806441     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  19 in total

1.  Prospective assessment of breast cancer risk from multimodal multiview ultrasound images via clinically applicable deep learning.

Authors:  Xuejun Qian; Jing Pei; Hui Zheng; Xinxin Xie; Lin Yan; Hao Zhang; Chunguang Han; Xiang Gao; Hanqi Zhang; Weiwei Zheng; Qiang Sun; Lu Lu; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Real-time diagnosis and visualization of tumor margins in excised breast specimens using fluorescence lifetime imaging and machine learning.

Authors:  Jakob Unger; Christoph Hebisch; Jennifer E Phipps; João L Lagarto; Hanna Kim; Morgan A Darrow; Richard J Bold; Laura Marcu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Ultrasound-based radiomics score: a potential biomarker for the prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hang-Tong Hu; Zhu Wang; Xiao-Wen Huang; Shu-Ling Chen; Xin Zheng; Si-Min Ruan; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-de Lu; Jie Yu; Jie Tian; Ping Liang; Wei Wang; Ming Kuang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Optimal breast cancer diagnostic strategy using combined ultrasound and diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  K M Shihab Uddin; Menghao Zhang; Mark Anastasio; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  Machine learning for medical ultrasound: status, methods, and future opportunities.

Authors:  Laura J Brattain; Brian A Telfer; Manish Dhyani; Joseph R Grajo; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

6.  Improved Inception V3 method and its effect on radiologists' performance of tumor classification with automated breast ultrasound system.

Authors:  Panpan Zhang; Zhaosheng Ma; Yingtao Zhang; Xiaodan Chen; Gang Wang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-07

7.  CTG-Net: Cross-task guided network for breast ultrasound diagnosis.

Authors:  Kaiwen Yang; Aiga Suzuki; Jiaxing Ye; Hirokazu Nosato; Ayumi Izumori; Hidenori Sakanashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Classification of breast cancer in ultrasound imaging using a generic deep learning analysis software: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anton S Becker; Michael Mueller; Elina Stoffel; Magda Marcon; Soleen Ghafoor; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Differential diagnosis between small breast phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas using artificial intelligence and ultrasound data.

Authors:  Sihua Niu; Jianhua Huang; Jia Li; Xueling Liu; Dan Wang; Yingyan Wang; Huiming Shen; Min Qi; Yi Xiao; Mengyao Guan; Diancheng Li; Feifei Liu; Xiuming Wang; Yu Xiong; Siqi Gao; Xue Wang; Ping Yu; Jia'an Zhu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

10.  Which supplementary imaging modality should be used for breast ultrasonography? Comparison of the diagnostic performance of elastography and computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Si Eun Lee; Ji Eun Moon; Yun Ho Rho; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2016-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.