| Literature DB >> 29203468 |
M Axelstad1, U Hass1, M Scholze2, S Christiansen1, A Kortenkamp2, J Boberg3.
Abstract
Human semen quality is declining in many parts of the world, but the causes are ill defined. In rodents, impaired sperm production can be seen with early life exposure to certain endocrine-disrupting chemicals, but the effects of combined exposures are not properly investigated. In this study, we examined the effects of early exposure to the painkiller paracetamol and mixtures of human relevant endocrine-disrupting chemicals in rats. One mixture contained four estrogenic compounds; another contained eight anti-androgenic environmental chemicals and a third mixture contained estrogens, anti-androgens and paracetamol. All exposures were administered by oral gavage to time-mated Wistar dams rats (n = 16-20) throughout gestation and lactation. In the postnatal period, testicular histology was affected by the total mixture, and at the end of weaning, male testis weights were significantly increased by paracetamol and the high doses of the total and the anti-androgenic mixture, compared to controls. In all dose groups, epididymal sperm counts were reduced several months after end of exposure, i.e. at 10 months of age. Interestingly, the same pattern of effects was seen for paracetamol as for mixtures with diverse modes of action. Reduced sperm count was seen at a dose level reflecting human therapeutic exposure to paracetamol. Environmental chemical mixtures affected sperm count at the lowest mixture dose indicating an insufficient margin of safety for the most exposed humans. This causes concern for exposure of pregnant women to paracetamol as well as environmental endocrine disrupters.Entities:
Keywords: acetaminophen; anti-androgenic; endocrine disrupters; estrogenic; pesticides; phthalates; semen quality
Year: 2017 PMID: 29203468 PMCID: PMC5776667 DOI: 10.1530/EC-17-0307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocr Connect ISSN: 2049-3614 Impact factor: 3.335
Composition of the tested mixtures.
| TotalMix 100 | TotalMix 200 | TotalMix 450 | AAMix 200 | AAMix 450 | EMix 200 | EMix 450 | Paracetamol | ||
| DBP | 0.01 | 1 | 2 | 4.5 | 2 | 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DEHP | 0.02 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vinclozolin | 0.009 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 4.05 | 1.8 | 4.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Prochloraz | 0.014 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 6.3 | 2.8 | 6.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Procymidone | 0.015 | 1.5 | 3 | 6.75 | 3 | 6.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Linuron | 0.0006 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Epoxiconazole | 0.01 | 1 | 2 | 4.5 | 2 | 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| p,p′-DDE | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.45 | 0.2 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4-MBC | 0.06 | 6 | 12 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 27 | 0 |
| OMC | 0.12 | 12 | 24 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 54 | 0 |
| Bisphenol A | 0.0015 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 0.675 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.675 | 0 |
| Butyl paraben | 0.06 | 6 | 12 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 27 | 0 |
| Paracetamola | 0.8 | 80 | 160 | 360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 360 |
| Sum (mg/kg day) | 1.12 | 112 | 224 | 504 | 16 | 36 | 48 | 109 | 360 |
*See Christiansen and coworkers (4) for estimates of high-end human intakes and for the adjusted intakes used as basis for the mixture study. aDams were dosed with paracetamol alone or in mixture only from GD 13 to 19 and after birth from PD 14 to 22, in order to avoid problems with parturition. For more information on the rationale behind this, see Axelstad and coworkers (5).
Body and organ weight on PD 22 and PD 300.
| Body weight (g) | Pooled testes (mg) | Body weight (g) | Pooled testes (mg) | Epididy-mides (mg) | LABC (mg) | Pituitary gland (mg) | |||
| Control | 12 | 48.7 ± 2.13 | 0.244 ± 0.008 | 18 | 517.7 ± 10.7 | 4.13 ± 0.085 | 0.696 ± 0.0185 | 1.287 ± 0.0567 | 0.0105 ± 0.00028 |
| TotalMix100 | 14 | 45.1 ± 1.15 | 0.243 ± 0.007 | 17 | 514.8 ± 13.70 | 4.02 ± 0.068 | 0.678 ± 0.0130 | 1.223 ± 0.0509 | 0.0102 ± 0.00024 |
| TotalMix200 | 13 | 50.5 ± 1.54 | 0.270 ± 0.010 | 12 | 511.8 ± 16.9 | 4.00 ± 0.139 | 0.679 ± 0.0148 | 1.284 ± 0.0510 | 0.0101 ± 0.00021 |
| TotalMix450 | 11 | 48.5 ± 1.03 | 0.273a ± 0.007 | 14 | 493.8 ± 10.3 | 4.09 ± 0.100 | 0.670 ± 0.0299 | 1.326 ± 0.0592 | 0.0102 ± 0.00037 |
| AAMix200 | 12 | 48.2 ± 2.04 | 0.256 ± 0.011 | 13 | 502.2 ± 8.1 | 3.86 ± 0.121 | 0.647 ± 0.0227 | 1.268 ± 0.0285 | 0.0104 ± 0.00034 |
| AAMix450 | 10 | 48.0 ± 1.03 | 0.269a ± 0.007 | 15 | 494.2 ± 10.2 | 4.22 ± 0.097 | 0.706 ± 0.0198 | 1.269 ± 0.0558 | 0.0106 ± 0.00011 |
| EMix200 | 14 | 47.4 ± 1.82 | 0.240 ± 0.011 | 15 | 496.8 ± 10.6 | 4.14 ± 0.088 | 0.647 ± 0.0013 | 1.224 ± 0.0623 | 0.0102 ± 0.00023 |
| EMix450 | 12 | 47.6 ± 0.92 | 0.247 ± 0.007 | 16 | 509.6 ± 8.2 | 4.12 ± 0.085 | 0.671 ± 0.0249 | 1.266 ± 0.0385 | 0.0102 ± 0.00033 |
| Paracetamol | 9 | 47.3 ± 1.24 | 0.257a ± 0.007 | 13 | 507.8 ± 13.4 | 3.89 ± 0.094 | 0.657 ± 0.0180 | 1.335 ± 0.0540 | 0.0103 ± 0.00033 |
Data shown are means ± s.e.m.
aValues statistically significantly different from controls are marked in bold (P < 0.05).
Testicular histopathology in rat offspring exposed perinatally to mixtures of endocrine disrupters (selected data).
| Percentage of tubules with lumen, mean ± | Tubular diameter, mean ± | Percentage of tubules with lumen, mean ± | Tubular diameter, mean ± | Normal epithelium | Seminiferous epithelium atrophy, Sertoli cell only | Seminiferous epithelium atrophy, spermatogenesis until pachytene stage | Focal atrophy 5–25% of tubules | Edema | Dilatation | ||||
| Control | 14 | 33.2 ± 27.8 | 82.1 ± 3.5 | 12 | 81.6 ± 8.9 | 111.7 ± 4.8 | 18 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| TotalMix450 | 10 | 10.5 ± 11.6* | 79.7 ± 4.1 | 10 | 81.9 ± 3.7 | 110.9 ± 6.1 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| AAMix450 | 11 | 30.5 ± 15.3 | 83.2 ± 3.3 | 10 | 77.5 ± 9.9 | 111.4 ± 4.6 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| EMix450 | 10 | 30.8 ± 37.7 | 80.7 ± 4.6 | 9 | 78.0 ± 7.6 | 112.0 ± 3.5 | 16 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| PM | 11 | 18.8 ± 14.3 | 83.5 ± 5.3 | 9 | 87.2 ± 4.5 | 115.6 ± 4.4 | 14 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
*Indicates value statistically significantly different from controls (P < 0.05, non-parametric Dunn’s test).
Figure 1Number of sperm per g cauda epididymis in 300-day-old male rats (N = 14–20). Group means and s.e.m. are shown. Statistically significant fewer sperm per g cauda was observed in all except one dose group compared to control. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Holm–Sidak correction was used *P < 0.05. The control value in this study is not significantly different from historical control values of epididymal sperm counts in adult male Wistar rats from our previous studies (515 ± 23, 521 ± 46, 364 ± 19, 490 ± 16, and 409 ± 18) (sperm/g, control mean ± s.e.m., references 8, 11, 12, 34 and 36).