Literature DB >> 12075117

Three-generation reproductive toxicity study of dietary bisphenol A in CD Sprague-Dawley rats.

R W Tyl1, C B Myers, M C Marr, B F Thomas, A R Keimowitz, D R Brine, M M Veselica, P A Fail, T Y Chang, J C Seely, R L Joiner, J H Butala, S S Dimond, S Z Cagen, R N Shiotsuka, G D Stropp, J M Waechter.   

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) was evaluated at concentrations of 0, 0.015, 0.3, 4.5, 75, 750, and 7500 ppm ( approximately 0.001, 0.02, 0.3, 5, 50, and 500 mg/kg/day of BPA) administered in the diet ad libitum to 30 CD((R)) Sprague-Dawley rats/sex/dose for 3 offspring generations, 1 litter/generation, through F3 adults. Adult systemic toxicity at 750 and 7500 ppm in all generations included: reduced body weights and body weight gains, reduced absolute and increased relative weanling and adult organ weights (liver, kidneys, adrenals, spleen, pituitary, and brain), and female slight/mild renal and hepatic pathology at 7500 ppm. Reproductive organ histopathology and function were unaffected. Ovarian weights as well as total pups and live pups/litter on postnatal day (PND) 0 were decreased at 7500 ppm, which exceeded the adult maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Mating, fertility, gestational indices; ovarian primordial follicle counts; estrous cyclicity; precoital interval; gestational length; offspring sex ratios; postnatal survival; nipple/areolae retention in preweanling males; epididymal sperm number, motility, morphology; daily sperm production (DSP), and efficiency of DSP were all unaffected. At 7500 ppm, vaginal patency (VP) and preputial separation (PPS) were delayed in F1, F2, and F3 offspring, associated with reduced body weights. Anogenital distance (AGD) on PND 0 was unaffected for F2 and F3 males and F3 females (F2 female AGD was increased at some doses, not at 7500 ppm, and was considered not biologically or toxicologically relevant). Adult systemic no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) = 75 ppm (5 mg/kg/day); reproductive and postnatal NOAELs = 750 ppm (50 mg/kg/day). There were no treatment-related effects in the low-dose region (0.001-5 mg/kg/day) on any parameters and no evidence of nonmonotonic dose-response curves across generations for either sex. BPA should not be considered a selective reproductive toxicant, based on the results of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12075117     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/68.1.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  99 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Prolonged exposure to a low-dose of bisphenol A increases spontaneous motor activity in adult male rats.

Authors:  Kazuo Nojima; Tomoyo Takata; Hiroshi Masuno
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Rebuttal of "Flawed Experimental Design Reveals the Need for Guidelines Requiring Appropriate Positive Controls in Endocrine Disruption Research" by (Vom Saal 2010).

Authors:  Leon Earl Gray; Bryce Ryan; Andrew K Hotchkiss; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Signals involved in the effects of bisphenol A (BPA) on proliferation and motility of Leydig cells: a comparative proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Zhuo-Jia Chen; Kun-Shui Zhang; Li-Chen Ge; Hao Liu; Li-Kun Chen; Jun Du; Hong-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 5.  Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Maricel V Maffini; Carlos Sonnenschein; Beverly S Rubin; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 19.871

6.  Developmental neurotoxicity study of dietary bisphenol A in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Donald G Stump; Melissa J Beck; Ann Radovsky; Robert H Garman; Lester L Freshwater; Larry P Sheets; M Sue Marty; John M Waechter; Stephen S Dimond; John P Van Miller; Ronald N Shiotsuka; Dieter Beyer; Anne H Chappelle; Steven G Hentges
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Putative environmental-endocrine disruptors and obesity: a review.

Authors:  Mai A Elobeid; David B Allison
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Association of urinary bisphenol a concentration with heart disease: evidence from NHANES 2003/06.

Authors:  David Melzer; Neil E Rice; Ceri Lewis; William E Henley; Tamara S Galloway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Basic exploratory research versus guideline-compliant studies used for hazard evaluation and risk assessment: bisphenol A as a case study.

Authors:  Rochelle W Tyl
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Why public health agencies cannot depend on good laboratory practices as a criterion for selecting data: the case of bisphenol A.

Authors:  John Peterson Myers; Frederick S vom Saal; Benson T Akingbemi; Koji Arizono; Scott Belcher; Theo Colborn; Ibrahim Chahoud; D Andrew Crain; Francesca Farabollini; Louis J Guillette; Terry Hassold; Shuk-mei Ho; Patricia A Hunt; Taisen Iguchi; Susan Jobling; Jun Kanno; Hans Laufer; Michele Marcus; John A McLachlan; Angel Nadal; Jörg Oehlmann; Nicolás Olea; Paola Palanza; Stefano Parmigiani; Beverly S Rubin; Gilbert Schoenfelder; Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto; Chris E Talsness; Julia A Taylor; Laura N Vandenberg; John G Vandenbergh; Sarah Vogel; Cheryl S Watson; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.