C S Uldbjerg1,2, T Koch1,2, Y-H Lim3,4, L S Gregersen1,2, C S Olesen1,2, A-M Andersson1,2, H Frederiksen1,2, B A Coull5, R Hauser6, A Juul1,2,7, E V Bräuner1,2. 1. Department of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. The International Research and Research Training Centre in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health (EDMaRC), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Biostatistics, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. 6. Department of Environmental Health, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. 7. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Globally, the ages at pubertal onset for girls and boys have been decreasing during recent decades, partly attributed to excess body fat accumulation. However, a growing body of literature has recognized that endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) may play an important role in this global trend, but the association has not yet been fully established. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: EDCs can interfere with normal hormone function and metabolism and play a role in pubertal onset. We aimed to systematically identify and evaluate the current evidence on the timing of pubertal onset in girls and boys following prenatal or postnatal exposures to xenobiotic EDCs. SEARCH METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic literature search of original peer-reviewed publications in the PubMed database through a block search approach using a combination of index MeSH and free text search terms. Publications were considered if they covered biomarkers of prenatal or postnatal exposures to xenobiotic EDCs (European Commission's list of category 1 EDCs) measured in maternal or child biospecimen and pubertal onset defined by the progression of the following milestones (and assessed in terms of the following measures): menarche (age), thelarche (Tanner staging) and pubarche (Tanner staging), in girls, and genital stage (Tanner staging), testicular volume (ml) and pubarche (Tanner staging), in boys. OUTCOMES: The literature search resulted in 703 references, of which we identified 52 publications fulfilling the eligibility criteria for the qualitative trend synthesis and 23 publications for the meta-analysis. The qualitative trend synthesis provided data on 103 combinations of associations between prenatal or postnatal exposure to EDC compounds groups and puberty outcomes and the meta-analysis enabled 18 summary risk estimates of meta-associations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Statistically significant associations in the qualitative trend synthesis suggested that postnatal exposure to phthalates may be associated with earlier thelarche and later pubarche. However, we did not find consistent evidence in the meta-analysis for associations between timing of pubertal onset in girls and boys and exposures to any of the studied xenobiotic EDCs. We were not able to identify specific pre- or postnatal windows of exposure as particularly critical and susceptible for effects of EDCs. Current evidence is subject to several methodological challenges and inconsistencies and evidence on specific exposure-outcome associations remains too scarce to firmly confirm EDC exposure as a risk factor for changes in age of pubertal onset in the general child population. To create a more uniform foundation for future comparison of evidence and to strengthen pooled studies, we recommend the use of more standardized approaches in the choice of statistical analyses, with exposure transformations, and in the definitions and assessments of puberty outcomes. The impact of mixtures of EDC exposures on the association also remains unestablished and would be valuable to elucidate for prenatal and postnatal windows of exposure. Future large, longitudinal epidemiological studies are needed to clarify the overall association.
BACKGROUND: Globally, the ages at pubertal onset for girls and boys have been decreasing during recent decades, partly attributed to excess body fat accumulation. However, a growing body of literature has recognized that endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) may play an important role in this global trend, but the association has not yet been fully established. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: EDCs can interfere with normal hormone function and metabolism and play a role in pubertal onset. We aimed to systematically identify and evaluate the current evidence on the timing of pubertal onset in girls and boys following prenatal or postnatal exposures to xenobiotic EDCs. SEARCH METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic literature search of original peer-reviewed publications in the PubMed database through a block search approach using a combination of index MeSH and free text search terms. Publications were considered if they covered biomarkers of prenatal or postnatal exposures to xenobiotic EDCs (European Commission's list of category 1 EDCs) measured in maternal or child biospecimen and pubertal onset defined by the progression of the following milestones (and assessed in terms of the following measures): menarche (age), thelarche (Tanner staging) and pubarche (Tanner staging), in girls, and genital stage (Tanner staging), testicular volume (ml) and pubarche (Tanner staging), in boys. OUTCOMES: The literature search resulted in 703 references, of which we identified 52 publications fulfilling the eligibility criteria for the qualitative trend synthesis and 23 publications for the meta-analysis. The qualitative trend synthesis provided data on 103 combinations of associations between prenatal or postnatal exposure to EDC compounds groups and puberty outcomes and the meta-analysis enabled 18 summary risk estimates of meta-associations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Statistically significant associations in the qualitative trend synthesis suggested that postnatal exposure to phthalates may be associated with earlier thelarche and later pubarche. However, we did not find consistent evidence in the meta-analysis for associations between timing of pubertal onset in girls and boys and exposures to any of the studied xenobiotic EDCs. We were not able to identify specific pre- or postnatal windows of exposure as particularly critical and susceptible for effects of EDCs. Current evidence is subject to several methodological challenges and inconsistencies and evidence on specific exposure-outcome associations remains too scarce to firmly confirm EDC exposure as a risk factor for changes in age of pubertal onset in the general child population. To create a more uniform foundation for future comparison of evidence and to strengthen pooled studies, we recommend the use of more standardized approaches in the choice of statistical analyses, with exposure transformations, and in the definitions and assessments of puberty outcomes. The impact of mixtures of EDC exposures on the association also remains unestablished and would be valuable to elucidate for prenatal and postnatal windows of exposure. Future large, longitudinal epidemiological studies are needed to clarify the overall association.
Authors: Kim G Harley; Stephen A Rauch; Jonathan Chevrier; Katherine Kogut; Kimberly L Parra; Celina Trujillo; Robert H Lustig; Louise C Greenspan; Andreas Sjödin; Asa Bradman; Brenda Eskenazi Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Chanley M Small; Metrecia L Terrell; Lorraine L Cameron; Julie Wirth; Carolyn P Monteilh; Michele Marcus Journal: Int J Child Adolesc health Date: 2009
Authors: Marike M Leijs; Janna G Koppe; Kees Olie; Wim M C van Aalderen; Pim de Voogt; Tom Vulsma; Matthijs Westra; Gavin W ten Tusscher Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 7.086
Authors: Deborah J Watkins; Martha Maria Téllez-Rojo; Kelly K Ferguson; Joyce M Lee; Maritsa Solano-Gonzalez; Clara Blank-Goldenberg; Karen E Peterson; John D Meeker Journal: Environ Res Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Mary S Wolff; Susan L Teitelbaum; Susan M Pinney; Gayle Windham; Laura Liao; Frank Biro; Lawrence H Kushi; Chris Erdmann; Robert A Hiatt; Michael E Rybak; Antonia M Calafat Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Carolina Bonilla; Sarah J Lewis; Richard M Martin; Jenny L Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal; Rosalind Eeles; Doug Easton; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Ali Amin Al Olama; Sara Benlloch; Kenneth Muir; Graham G Giles; Fredrik Wiklund; Henrik Gronberg; Christopher A Haiman; Johanna Schleutker; Børge G Nordestgaard; Ruth C Travis; Nora Pashayan; Kay-Tee Khaw; Janet L Stanford; William J Blot; Stephen Thibodeau; Christiane Maier; Adam S Kibel; Cezary Cybulski; Lisa Cannon-Albright; Hermann Brenner; Jong Park; Radka Kaneva; Jyotsna Batra; Manuel R Teixeira; Hardev Pandha; Mark Lathrop; George Davey Smith Journal: BMC Med Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 8.775