Literature DB >> 29197974

Fitness correlates of age at primiparity in a hunted moose population.

Stine S Markussen1, Anne Loison2, Ivar Herfindal3, Erling J Solberg4, Hallvard Haanes5, Knut H Røed6, Morten Heim4, Bernt-Erik Sæther3.   

Abstract

Trade-offs between fitness-related traits are predicted from the principle of resource allocation, where increased fecundity or parental investment leads to reduced future reproduction or survival. However, fitness traits can also be positively correlated due to individual differences (e.g. body mass). Age at primiparity could potentially explain variation in individual fitness either because early primiparity is costly, or it may lead to higher lifetime reproductive success. Based on long-term monitoring and genetic parentage assignment of an island population of moose, we quantified reproductive performance and survival, and examined whether early maturing females have higher total calf production than late maturing females. We explored if harvesting of calves affected the subsequent reproductive success of their mothers, i.e. also due to a post-weaning cost of reproduction, and whether there are any intergenerational effects of female reproductive success. There was a positive relationship between current and future reproduction. The probability to reproduce was lower for females that were unsuccessful the year before, indicating a strong quality effect on productivity. Females that started to reproduce as 2-year olds had a slightly higher total calf production compared to those starting at age three or four. High-performing mothers were also correlated with daughters that performed well in terms of reproductive success. Our results suggest that the observed individual heterogeneity in fitness could be associated with differences in age at primiparity. This heterogeneity was not affected by reproductive costs associated with tending for a calf post-weaning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age of maturity; Cost of reproduction; Individual heterogeneity; Life history; Ungulates

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29197974     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-4021-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  37 in total

1.  Individual heterogeneity in vital parameters and demographic stochasticity.

Authors:  Yngvild Vindenes; Steinar Engen; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Individual covariation in life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Cam; William A Link; Evan G Cooch; Jean-Yves Monnat; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Lack of compensatory body growth in a high performance moose Alces alces population.

Authors:  Erling J Solberg; Mathieu Garel; Morten Heim; Vidar Grøtan; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Cost of reproduction and covariation of life history traits in birds.

Authors:  M Linden; A P Møller
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Population properties affect inbreeding avoidance in moose.

Authors:  Ivar Herfindal; Hallvard Haanes; Knut H Røed; Erling J Solberg; Stine S Markussen; Morten Heim; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Trade-offs between growth and reproduction in female bison.

Authors:  Wendy C H Green; Aron Rothstein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Des différences, pourquoi? Transmission, maintenance and effects of phenotypic variance.

Authors:  Floriane Plard; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Tim Coulson; Shripad Tuljapurkar
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Maternal allocation in bison: co-occurrence of senescence, cost of reproduction, and individual quality.

Authors:  Sandra Hamel; Joseph M Craine; E Gene Towne
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.657

9.  Experimental manipulation of female reproduction demonstrates its fitness costs in kangaroos.

Authors:  Uriel Gélin; Michelle E Wilson; Graeme Coulson; Marco Festa-Bianchet
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Environmental phenology and geographical gradients in moose body mass.

Authors:  Ivar Herfindal; Erling Johan Solberg; Bernt-Erik Saether; Kjell Arild Høgda; Reidar Andersen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 3.298

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of age on foraging behavior in two closely related albatross species.

Authors:  Caitlin K Frankish; Andrea Manica; Richard A Phillips
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.600

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.