Literature DB >> 26899422

Des différences, pourquoi? Transmission, maintenance and effects of phenotypic variance.

Floriane Plard1, Jean-Michel Gaillard2, Tim Coulson3, Shripad Tuljapurkar1.   

Abstract

Despite the observed distribution of variable individual phenotypes, survival and reproductive performance in wild populations, models of population dynamics often focus on mean demographic rates. Populations are constituted by individuals with different phenotypes and thus different performances. However, many models of population dynamics provide no understanding of the influence of this phenotypic variation on population dynamics. In this paper, we investigate how the relationships between demographic rates and phenotype distribution influence the transmission and the upholding of phenotypic variation, and population dynamics. We used integral projection models to measure associations between differences of phenotypic trait (size or mass) among individuals and demographic rates, growth and inheritance, and then quantify the influence of phenotypic variation on population dynamics. We build an analytical and general model resulting from simplifications assuming small phenotypic variance. We illustrate our model with two case studies: a short- and a long-lived life history. Population growth rate r is determined by a Lotka style equation in which survival and fertility are averaged over a phenotypic distribution that changes with age. Here, we further decomposed r to show how much it is affected by shifts in phenotypic average as well as variance. We derived the elasticities of r to the first and second derivative of each demographic rate. In particular, we show that the nonlinearity of change in selective pressure with phenotype matters more to population dynamics than the strength of this selection. In other words, the variance of a given trait will be most important when the strength of selection increases (or decreases) nonlinearly with that trait. Inheritance shapes the distribution of newborn phenotypes. Even if newborns have a fixed average phenotype, the variance among newborns increases with phenotypic variance among mothers, strength of inheritance and developmental variation. We explain how the components of inheritance can influence phenotypic variance and thus the demographic rates and population dynamics. In particular, when mothers of different ages produce offspring of different mean phenotype, the inheritance function can have a large influence on both the mean and variance of the trait at different ages and thus on the population growth rate. We provide new tools to understand how phenotypic variation influences population dynamics and discuss in which life histories we expect this influence to be large. For instance, in our short-lived life history, individual variability has larger effect than in our long-lived life history. We conclude by indicating future directions of analysis.
© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  growth rate; heritability; individual heterogeneity; inheritance; integral projection model; phenotypic variation; population dynamics; size structure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26899422      PMCID: PMC6761928          DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  47 in total

1.  Jensen's inequality predicts effects of environmental variation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Evolution of Size-Dependent Flowering in Onopordum illyricum: A Quantitative Assessment of the Role of Stochastic Selection Pressures.

Authors:  Mark Rees; Andy Sheppard; David Briese; Marc Mangel
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Integral projection models for species with complex demography.

Authors:  Stephen P Ellner; Mark Rees
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Seed dormancy and delayed flowering in monocarpic plants: selective interactions in a stochastic environment.

Authors:  Mark Rees; Dylan Z Childs; Jessica C Metcalf; Karen E Rose; Andy W Sheppard; Peter J Grubb
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Natural selection and quantitative genetics of life-history traits in Western women: a twin study.

Authors:  K M Kirk; S P Blomberg; D L Duffy; A C Heath; I P Owens; N G Martin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams.

Authors:  D W Coltman; M Festa-Bianchet; J T Jorgenson; C Strobeck
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Lifetime Reproductive Success and Heritability in Nature.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods.

Authors:  C W Fox; M E Czesak
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 9.  Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon; L E Kruuk
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Variation in viability selection among cohorts of juvenile red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus).

Authors:  Andrew G McAdam; Stan Boutin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  5 in total

1.  Individual variation in reproductive behaviour is linked to temporal heterogeneity in predation risk.

Authors:  Miguel Barbosa; Amy E Deacon; Maria Joao Janeiro; Indar Ramnarine; Michael Blair Morrissey; Anne E Magurran
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Fitness correlates of age at primiparity in a hunted moose population.

Authors:  Stine S Markussen; Anne Loison; Ivar Herfindal; Erling J Solberg; Hallvard Haanes; Knut H Røed; Morten Heim; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The evolution of labile traits in sex- and age-structured populations.

Authors:  Dylan Z Childs; Ben C Sheldon; Mark Rees
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Incorporating variability in simulations of seasonally forced phenology using integral projection models.

Authors:  Devin W Goodsman; Brian H Aukema; Nate G McDowell; Richard S Middleton; Chonggang Xu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Phenotypic plasticity in life-history traits of Daphnia galeata in response to temperature - a comparison across clonal lineages separated in time.

Authors:  Nicole Henning-Lucass; Mathilde Cordellier; Bruno Streit; Klaus Schwenk
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.